The acoustic activity of Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura Leptodactylidae) is strongly influenced by climatic conditions, but not by latitude or landscape metrics

REFERENCES

• Barton K. 2020. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn [Accessed 2022 May 31].
   Google Scholar
• Becker CG, Fonseca CR, Haddad CFB, Batista RF, Prado PI. 2007. Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science. 318(5857):1775–1777. doi:10.1126/science.1149374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker CG, Fonseca CR, Haddad CFB, Prado PI. 2010. Habitat split as a cause of local population declines of amphibians with aquatic larvae. Conserv Biol. 24(1):287–294. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01324.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JS. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 24(3):127–135. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnefond A, Courtois EA, Sueur J, Sugai LSM, Llusia D. 2020. Climatic breadth of calling behaviour in two widespread Neotropical frogs: insights from humidity extremes. Glob Chang Biol. 26(10):5431–5446. doi:10.1111/gcb.15266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks ME, Kristensen K, Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Mächler M, Bolker BM. 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9(2):378–400. doi:10.5167/uzh-148918
   Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Digby A, Towsey M, Bell BD, Teal PD, Giuggioli L. 2013. A practical comparison of manual and autonomous methods for acoustic monitoring. Methods Ecol Evol. 4(7):675–683. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte MHL, Caliari EP, Viana YP, Nascimento LB. 2019. A natural orchestra: how are anuran choruses formed in artificial ponds in southeast Brazil? Amphibia Reptilia. 40(3):373–382. doi:10.1163/15685381-20191079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte MHL, Sousa-Lima RS, Young RJ, Farina A, Vasconcelos M, Rodrigues M, Pieretti N. 2015. The impact of noise from open-cast mining on Atlantic forest biophony. Biol Conserv. 191:623–631. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost DR. 2023. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.1. Am Mus Nat Hist. doi:10.5531/db.vz.0001 Available from: https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php [Accessed 22 Apr 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Gambale PG, Bastos RP. 2014. Vocal repertoire and bioacoustic analyses in Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from southern Brazil. Herpetol J. 24:31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra V, de Queiroz Costa N, Llusia D, Márquez R, Bastos RP. 2020. Nightly patterns of calling activity in anuran assemblages of the Cerrado, Brazil. Commun Ecol. 21(1):33–42. doi:10.1007/s42974-020-00013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra V, Llusia D, Gambale PG, de Morais AR, Márquez R, Bastos RP, Robillard T. 2018. The advertisement calls of Brazilian anurans: historical review, current knowledge and future directions. PLoS ONE. 13(1):1–22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig F. 2021. Dharma: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (Multi-Level/mixed) Regression Models. Available from: https://CRAN.RProj [accessed 2022 May 30].
   Google Scholar
• Hesselbarth MHK, Sciaini M, With KA, Wiegand K, Nowosad J. 2019. Landscapemetrics an open-source R tool to calculate landscape metrics. Ecography. 42(10):1648–1657. doi:10.1111/ecog.04617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer WR, Rand AS, Cruz CAG, Peixoto OL, Nelson CE. 1990. Frog of Boracéia. Arq Zool. 31:231–410.
   Google Scholar
• Höbel G, Barta T. 2014. Adaptive plasticity in calling site selection in grey treefrogs (Hyla versicolor). Behaviour. 151:741–754. doi:10.1163/1568539X-00003167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2022. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2022-2. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org [Accessed 2022 Sep 27].
   Google Scholar
• Klink C, Machado RB. 2005. A conservação do Cerrado brasileiro [Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado]. Megadiversidade. 1:147–155. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler J, Jansen M, Rodríguez A, Kok PJR, Toledo LF, Emmrich M, Glaw F, Haddad CFB, Rödel MO, Vences M. 2017. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa. 4251(1):1–124. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4251.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp K, Signorelli L, Bastos RP. 2010. Distribuição temporal e diversidade de modos reprodutivos de anfíbios anuros no Parque Nacional das Emas e entorno, Estado de Goiás, Brasil [Temporal distribution and diversity of reproductive modes in anuran amphibians in the Emas Nation Park and surrounding area, State of Goiás, Brazil]. Iheringia Série Zool. 100:192–200. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/s0073-47212010000300002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiolo P. 2010. The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. Biol Conserv. 143(7):1635–1645. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llusia D, Márquez R, Beltrán JF, Benítez M, Do Amaral JP. 2013a. Calling behaviour under climate change: geographical and seasonal variation of calling temperatures in ectotherms. Glob Change Biol. 19(9):2655–2674. doi:10.1111/gcb.12267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llusia D, Márquez R, Beltrán JF, Moreira C, Do Amaral JP. 2013b. Environmental and social determinants of anuran lekking behavior: intraspecific variation in populations at thermal extremes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 67(9):493–511. doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1469-2
   Google Scholar
• Mapbiomas Project. 2021. Collection 7 of the annual series of land use and land cover maps of Brazil. Available from: https://mapbiomas.org/en [Accessed 22 Apr 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Morais AR, Batista VG, Gambale PG, Signorelli L, Bastos RP. 2012. Acoustic communication in a Neotropical frog (Dendropsophus minutus): vocal repertoire, variability and individual discrimination. Herpetol J. 22:249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais AR, Signorelli L, Gambale PG, Kopp K, Nomura F, Guimarães LD, Vaz-Silva W, Ramos J, Bastos RP. 2011. Anfíbios anuros associados a corpos d’ água do sudoeste do estado de Goiás, Brasil [Anuran amphibians associated to water bodies in southwest of Goiás State, Brazil]. Biota Neotrop. 11(3):355–363. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/S1676-06032011000300028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzzi GM, Duarte MHL, Braga NO, Bastos RP, Nascimento LB. 2023. Acoustic monitoring of anuran communities in road noise disturbed soundscapes. Herpetol J. 33(2):34–42. doi:10.33256/33.2.3442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navas CA, Bevier CR. 2001. Thermal dependency of calling performance in the eurythermic frog Colostethus subpunctatus. Herpetologica. 57:384–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina OE, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Corrada-Bravo CJ, Mitchell Aide T. 2013. Variable response of anuran calling activity to daily precipitation and temperature: implications for climate change. Ecosphere. 4(4):47. doi:10.1890/ES12-00258.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Granados C, Bota G, Giralt D, Barrero A, Gómez-Catasús J, Bustillo-De La Rosa D, Traba J. 2019. Vocal activity rate index: a useful method to infer terrestrial bird abundance with acoustic monitoring. Ibis. 161(4):901–907. doi:10.1111/ibi.12728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalho Q, Tourinho L, Almeida-Gomes M, Vale MM, Prevedello JA. 2021. Reforestation can compensate negative effects of climate change on amphibians. Biol Conserv. 260:109187. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalho WP, With KA, Mesquita GS, Arruda FV, Guerra V, Ferraz D, Andrade MS, Prado VHM. 2022. Habitat fragmentation rather than habitat amount or habitat split reduces the diversity and abundance of ground-dwelling anurans within forest remnants of the Brazilian Cerrado. J Nat Conserv. 69:126259. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JF, Walter BMT. 2008. As principais fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado [The main phytophysiognomies of the Cerrado biome]. In: Sano M, et al., editors. Cerrado: Ecologia e flora. Brasília (Brazil): Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; p. 152–212.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk CM, Saenz D. 2016. Environmental drivers of anuran calling phenology in a seasonal Neotropical ecosystem. Austral Ecol. 41(1):16–27. doi:10.1111/aec.12281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorelli L, Bastos RP, De Marco P, With KA. 2016. Landscape context affects site occupancy of pond-breeding anurans across a disturbance gradient in the Brazilian Cerrado. Landsc Ecol. 31(9):1997–2012. doi:10.1007/s10980-016-0376-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva RA, Martins IA, Rossa-Feres D. 2008. Bioacústica e sítio de vocalização em taxocenoses de anuros de área aberta no noroeste paulista [Bioacoustics and calling site in anuran assemblages of open area in the northwest of São Paulo State, Brazil]. Biota Neotrop. 8(3):123–134. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/S1676-06032008000300012
   Google Scholar
• Souza AO, Oliveira SR, Dias GP, Bastos RP, Morais AR. 2020. Annual and daily patterns of calling activity in male Scinax fuscomarginatus (Anura: Hylidae) from Central Brazil. Zoologia. 37:1–6. doi:10.3897/zoologia.37.e47223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassburg BBN, Brooks T, Feltran-Barbieri R, Iribarrem A, Crouzeilles R, Loyola R, Latawiec AE, Oliveira Filho FJB, De Scaramuzza CAM, Scarano FR, et al. 2017. Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nat Ecol Evol. 1(4):99. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugai LSM, Silva TSF, Llusia D, Siqueira T, Gómez‐Rodríguez C. 2021. Drivers of assemblage-wide calling activity in tropical anurans and the role of temporal resolution. J Anim Ecol. 90(3):673–684. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugai LSM, Silva TSF, Ribeiro JW Jr, Llusia D. 2018. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. Bioscience. 69(1):15–25. doi:10.1093/biosci/biy147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo LF, Martins IA, Bruschi DP, Passos MA, Alexandre C, Haddad CFB. 2014. The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context. Acta Ethol. 18(2):87–99. doi:10.1007/s10211-014-0194-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz-Silva W, Maciel NM, Nomura F, Morais AR, Batista VG, Santos DL, Andrade SP, Oliveira AÂB, Brandão RA, Bastos RP. 2020. Guia de identificação das espécies de anfíbios do Distrito Federal, do estado de Goiás e (Anura e Gymnophiona) Brasil Central [Guide of identification for amphibian species (Anura and Gymnophiona) from Goiás State and Federal District, Central Brazil]. Curitiba (Brazil): Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia. Portuguese. doi:10.7476/9786587590011
   Google Scholar
• Wells KD. 1977. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav. 25:666–693. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(77)90118-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells KD. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226893334.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Wells KD, Schwartz JJ. 2007. The behavioral ecology of anuran communication. In: Narins P, et al., editors. Hearing and sound communication in amphibians. New York (NY): Springer; p. 44–86. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-47796-1_3
   Google Scholar
• Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York (NY): Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6
   Google Scholar