Between contestation and compromise? An evolutionary analysis of eurosceptic MEPs in the EP’s INTA committee

References

• Behm, Anne-Sophie, and Nathalie Brack. 2019. “Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing? Comparing Eurosceptic and Non-Eurosceptic meps’ Parliamentary Behaviour.” Journal of European Integration 41 (8): 1069–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1645845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja, and Miriam Hartlapp. 2022. Eurosceptic Contestation and Legislative Behaviour in the European Parliament. In European Parliament's Political Groups in Turbulent Times, edited by Petra Ahrens, Anna Elomäki, and Johanna Kantola, 97–122. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94012-6_5.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja, and Thomas Risse. 2018. “From the Euro to the Schengen Crises: European Integration Theories, Politicization, and Identity Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, Nathalie. 2018. Opposing Europe in the European Parliament: Rebels and Radicals in the Chamber. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60201-5.
   Google Scholar
• Carrieri, Luca, and Davide Vittori. 2021. “Defying Europe? The Euroscepticism of Radical Right and Radical Left Voters in Western Europe.” Journal of European Integration 43 (8): 955–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1882454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chryssogelos, Angelos. 2022. “Exploring the Cave of the Unknown: Transnational Party Politics in the EU.” Journal of European Integration 44 (3): 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2055839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coremans, Evelyn, and Katharina Meissner. 2018. “Putting Power into Practice: Administrative and Political Capacity Building in the European Parliament’s Committee for International Trade.” Public Administration 96 (3): 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, William T., and Stefan Thierse. 2021. “Individual Amending Activity in the European Parliament Committee System.” Journal of European Integration 44 (4): 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1950704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bièvre, Dirk, Patricia Garcia-Duran, Leif Johan Eliasson, and Olivier Costa. 2020. “Editorial: Politicization of EU Trade Policy Across Time and Space.” Politics & Governance 8 (1): 239–242. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.3055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine. 2018. Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793380.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine, and Sarah Hobolt. 2020. Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe. Princeton: Princeton Univesity Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt9k3d3.
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, Pieter. 2011. “No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration.” Journal of European Integration 33 (5): 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.546849.
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, Pieter, Ruud Koopmans, Wolfgang Merkel, Oliver Strijbis, and Michael Zürn. 2019. The Struggle Over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652698.003.
   Google Scholar
• Duina, Francesco. 2019. “Why the Excitement? Values, Identities, and the Politicization of EU Trade Policy with North America.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (12): 1866–1882. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1678056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, Robert, and Ladislav Timulak. 2005. Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology, edited by Jeremy Miles, and Paul Gilbert, 147–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780198527565.003.0011.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2010. Report on Trade and Economic Relations with Turkey: A7-0238/2010: European Parliament. Report on trade and economic relations with Turkey | A7-0238/2010 | European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0238_EN.html.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2015. Amendments 1 - 154 - European parliament. Report on Recommendations to the European Commission on the TTIP negotiations https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-552035_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2017a. “Debates - Negotiating Mandate for Trade Negotiations with Australia - Negotiating Mandate for Trade Negotiations with New Zealand (Debate) - Wednesday, 25 October 2017. Europarl.Europa.eu.” Accessed May 20, 2022. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-10-25-ITM-015_EN.html.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2017b. Report Recommendation to the Council on the Proposed Negotiating Mandate for Trade Negotiations with Australia. europarl.europa.eu. Accessed June 5, 2022. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0311_EN.html.
   Google Scholar
• GUE/NGL. 2019. “EU-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement - An Explainer.” https://left.eu/issues/explainers/eu-mercosur-free-trade-agreement-an-explainer/.
   Google Scholar
• GUE/NGL. 2020. “Mexico Trade Deal Shows EU Not Learning from Pandemic.” https://left.eu/mexico-trade-deal-shows-eu-not-learning-from-pandemic/.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2019. “Grand Theories of European Integration in the 21st Century.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (8): 1113–1133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblond, Patrick, and Crina Viju-Miljusevic. 2019. “EU Trade Policy in the Twenty-First Century: Change, Continuity and Challenges.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (12): 1836–1846. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1678059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, Sophie, and Rozalie Czesana. 2019. “From the Back Rooms to the Street? A Research Agenda for Explaining Variation in the Public Salience of Trade Policy-Making in Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (12): 1847–1865. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1678058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, Ludvig. 2021. “To Democratize or to Protect? How the Response to Anti‐System Parties Reshapes the Eu’s Transnational Party System.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (3): 721–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, Stéphanie, Olivier Rozenberg, and Selma Bendjaballah. 2020. “Enduring Consensus: Why the EU Legislative Process Stays the Same.” Journal of European Integration 43 (4): 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1800679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. 2017. “The New Politics of Trade Negotiations: The Case of the EU-Korea FTA.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 827–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1371707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poingt, Guillaume, and Service Infographie. 2019. “Pour ou contre le «libre-échange»: les propositions des candidats aux européennes.” https://www.lefigaro.fr/economie/le-scan-eco/dessous-chiffres/pour-ou-contre-le-libre-echange-les-propositions-des-candidats-aux-europeennes-20190517.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, Ariadna, and Lara Panning. 2021. “Engaging the Disengaged? Explaining the Participation of Eurosceptic Meps in Trilogue Negotiations.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (1): 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1859596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2020. “Politicisation Management in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (3): 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich, and Daniel Höhmann. 2021. “Do Party System Parameters Explain Differences in Legislative Organization? Fragmentation, Polarisation, and the Density of Regulation in European Parliaments, 1945–2009.” Party Politics 28 (4): 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211002490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul. 1998. “A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 33 (3): 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teney, Céline, Onawa Promise Lacewell, and Pieter De Wilde. 2014. “Winners and Losers of Globalization in Europe: Attitudes and Ideologies.” European Political Science Review 6 (4): 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tereszkiewicz, Filip. 2021. “The Politicization of European Union Trade Policy: Radical-Left Euroskeptic Opposition to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.” Journal of Economic Integration 36 (3): 409–436. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2021.36.3.409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vox. 2021 “VOX defiende la ganadería en la sierra de Andújar frente a «los ataques globalistas».” https://www.voxespana.es/noticias/vox-defiende-la-ganaderia-en-la-sierra-de-andujar-frente-a-los-ataques-globalistas-20210610?provincia=jaen.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Michael, and Amie Kreppel. 2020. “The European Parliament’s Role as an Informal EU Agenda Setter: The Influence of Own Initiative Reports.” Public Administration 99 (2): 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendler, Frank, and Achim Hurrelmann. 2022. “Discursive Postfunctionalism: Theorizing the Interface Between EU Politicization and Policy-Making.” Journal of European Integration 44 (7): 941–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2045592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, Thomas. 2020. “Government Euroscepticism and Differentiated Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (12): 1819–1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1703789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Alasdair. 2017. “European Trade Policy in Interesting Times.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1371705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Alasdair. 2019. “Two Wrongs Make a Right? The Politicization of Trade Policy and European Trade Strategy.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (12): 1883–1899. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1678055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar