Contextualised Convivialities in Superdiverse Neighbourhoods – Methodological Approaches Informed by Urban Design

References

• Amin, A., 2008. Collective Culture and Urban Public Space. City, 12 (1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Agyeman, J., and Erickson, J.-S., 2012. Culture, Recognition, and the Negotiation of Difference. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32 (3), 358–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., Kearns, A., and Livingstone, M., 2012. Place Attachment in Deprived Neighbourhoods: The Impacts of Population Turnover and Social Mix. Housing Studies, 27 (2), 208–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergold, J., and Thomas, S., 2012. Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 37 (4 (142)), 191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlackSpace Urbanist Collective. 2020. The BlackSpace Manifesto. Available from: https://www.blackspace.org/manifesto [Accessed 15 December 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J., 2013. Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, K., 2016. Lost in the ‘Churn’? Locating Neighbourliness in a Transient Neighbourhood. Environment and Planning A, 48 (8), 1599–1616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., 2003. Public Places – Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., 2016. Explorations in Urban Design: An Urban Design Research Primer. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T., 2008. We’re Over-Researched Here! Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue Within Qualitative Research Engagements. Sociology, 42 (5), 953–970.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C.R., 2014. Glasgow’s Ellis Island? The Integration and Stigmatisation of Govanhill’s Roma Population. People, Place and Policy, 8 (1), 34–50.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Dwyer, P., and Waite, L., 2011. ‘Good Relations’ Among Neighbours and Workmates? The Everyday Encounters of Accession, 8, Migrants and Established Communities in Urban England. Population, Space and Place, 17, 727–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, J., 2020. Architectures of Encounter: Shaping Social Interactions in the Intercultural City. Thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, M., 2015. Urban Youth and Photovoice: Visual Ethnography in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., and Iveson, K., 2008. Planning and Diversity in the City: Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, N., and Rishbeth, C., 2006. Engaging with Marginalised Groups in Public Open Space Research: The Potential of Collaboration and Combined Methods. Planning Theory & Practice, 7 (1), 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, K.G., and Caro, F.G., 2014. An Overview of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Around the World. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26 (1-2), 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganji, F., and Rishbeth, C., 2020. Conviviality by Design: The Socio-Spatial Qualities of Spaces of Intercultural Urban Encounters. Urban Design International, 25 (3), 215–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, J., and Gemzoe, L., 1996. Public Spaces – Public Life. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P., 2004. After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture? Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G., 1998. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mills Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K., and Lewis, T., 2016. Green Gentrification: Urban Sustainability and the Struggle for Environmental Justice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson, J., 2013. Sheffield’s Roma, David Blunkett and an Immoral Racist Panic. Institute for Race Relations. Available from: https://irr.org.uk/article/sheffields-roma-david-blunkett-and-an-immoral-racist-panic1/ [Accessed 5 Sep 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Heil, T., 2015. Conviviality: (Re)negotiating Minimal Consensus. In: S. Vertovec, ed. Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies. Abingdon: Routledge, 317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., 2014. Link and Place – Bridging Stakeholder Divides. In: M. Carmona, ed. Explorations in Urban Design: An Urban Design Research Primer. Farnham: Ashgate, 90–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lownsbrough, H., and Beunderman, J., 2007. Equally Spaced? Public Space and Interaction Between Diverse Communities. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C., 2005. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, S., et al., 2016. ‘You Can’t Move in Hackney Without Bumping Into an Anthropologist’: Why Certain Places Attract Research Attention. Qualitative Research, 16 (5), 491–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, S., et al., 2015. Multiculture and Public Parks: Researching Super-Diversity and Attachment in Public Green Space. Population, Space and Place, 21, 463–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, G., 2009. Everyday Cosmopolitanism and the Labour of Intercultural Community. In: A. Wise and S. Velayutham, eds. Everyday Multiculturalism. London: Palgrave, 46–65.
   Google Scholar
• Parker-Jenkins, M., 2018. Problematising Ethnography and Case Study: Reflections on Using Ethnographic Techniques and Researcher Positioning. Ethnography and Education, 13 (1), 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekut, A., and Valentine, G., 2017. Spaces of Encounter and Attitudes Towards Difference: A Comparative Study of two European Cities. Social Science Research, 62, 175–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R., 2014. Editorial: Special Issue – ‘Roma Integration in the UK’. People, Place and Policy, 8 (1), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M., and Rishbeth, C., 2013. Flexibility in Place and Meanings of Place by First Generation Migrants. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103, 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radice, M., 2016. Unpacking Intercultural Conviviality in Multiethnic Commercial Streets. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37 (5), 432–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J., 2014. Roma in the News: An Examination of Media and Political Discourse and What Needs to Change. People, Place and Policy, 8 (1), 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rishbeth, C., and Rogaly, B., 2017. Sitting Outside: Conviviality, Self-Care and the Design of Benches in Urban Public Space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43 (2), 284–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rishbeth, C., Ganji, F., and Vodicka, G., 2018. Ethnographic Understandings of Ethnically Diverse Neighbourhoods to Inform Urban Design Practice. Local Environment, 23 (1), 36–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez de Madaria, I., and and Roberts, M. eds., 2013. Fair Shared Cities: The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, W., et al., 2009. SpeakOut: The Step-by-Step Guide to Speakouts and Community Workshops. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R., 2018. Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sukarieh, M., and Tannock, S., 2013. On the Problem of Over-Researched Communities: The Case of the Shatila Palestinian Refugee Camp in Lebanon. Sociology, 47 (3), 494–508.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G., 2008. Living with Difference: Reflections on Geographies of Encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 323–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G., 2013. Living with Difference: Proximity and Encounter in Urban Life. Geography, 98 (1), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S., 2007. Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30 (6), 1024–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. ed., 2014. Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vodicka, G. 2018. Everyday Public Spaces in an Ethnically Diverse Neighbourhood: Contextualised Convivialities and Boundary-Crossing Urban Design. PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, R., 2020. Architecture is Systemically Racist. So What is the Profession Going To Do About It? Architects Journal. Available from https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/architecture-is-systemically-racist-so-what-is-the-profession-going-to-do-about-it?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter#Echobox=1595403184 [Accessed 15 December 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C.C., 1999. Photovoice: A Participatory Action Research Strategy Applied to Women’s Health. Journal of Womens Health, 8 (2), 185–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S., 2014. Researching Social Relations in Super-Diverse Neighbourhoods: Mapping the Field. IRiS Working Paper. Birmingham: Institute for Research into Superdiversity.
   Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S., 2016. Settling in a Super-Diverse Context: Recent Migrants’ Experiences of Conviviality. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37 (5), 449–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, W.H., 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, H., and Darling, J., 2016. The Possibilities of Encounter. In: J. Darling and H. Wilson, eds. Encountering the City: Urban Encounters from Accra to New York. New York: Routledge, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A., and Noble, G., 2016. Convivialities: An Orientation. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37 (5), 423–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, A., and Velayutham, S., 2014. Conviviality in Everyday Multiculturalism: Some Brief Comparisons between Singapore and Sydney. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17 (4), 406–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., and Glass, I., 2010. Everything Sings: Maps for a Narrative Atlas. Los Angeles, CA: Siglio.
   Google Scholar
• Zavestoski, S., and Agyeman, J., 2015. Incomplete Streets. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar