454
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Pop-Up Ethnography: Methods for Studying Social Relations at the Register of Urban Public Space

References

  • Amit, V., 2020. Rethinking Anthropological Perspectives on Community: Watchful Indifference and Joint Commitment. In: B Jansen, ed. Rethinking Community through Transdisciplinary Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 49–67.
  • Anderson, E., 1990. Streetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Anderson, E., 2004. The Cosmopolitan Canopy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595 (1), 14–31.
  • Aquino, K., et al., 2020. The right to the city: outdoor informal sport and urban belonging in multicultural spaces. Annals of Leisure Research, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2020.1859391
  • Beebe, J., 1995. Basic concepts and techniques of rapid appraisal. Human Organization, 54 (1), 42–51.
  • Boucher, N., 2013. Back to the Future In Los Angeles: A Critical Review of History. In: B Momchedjikova, ed. Captured by the City: Perspectives in Urban Culture Studies. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 87–103.
  • Duneier, M., 1999. Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
  • Ervin, A., 1997. Trying the Impossible: Relatively “Rapid” Methods in a City-Wide Needs Assessment. Human Organization, 56 (4), 379–387.
  • Gayle, D. 2018. Arrest of two black men at Starbucks for ‘trespassing’ sparks protests. The Guardian, 16 April, 2018. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/16/arrest-of-two-black-men-at-starbucks-for-trespassing-sparks-protests Accessed 14 August 2018.
  • Germain, A., et al., 1995. Cohabitation interethnique et vie de quartier. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec, ministère des Affaires internationales, de l'Immigration et des Communautés culturelles, collection Études et recherches No. 12.
  • Germain, A., 1998. Citoyenneté ou “citadinité” ? : Montréal ou les dilemmes d'une ville pluriethnique. Géographie et Cultures, 26, 95–108.
  • Germain, A., 1999. Les quartiers multiethniques montréalais: Une lecture urbaine. Recherches Sociographiques, 40 (1), 9–32.
  • Goffman, E., 1963. Behaviour in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
  • Goffman, E., 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
  • Goffman, E., 1983. The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 48 (1), 1–17.
  • Hall, S., 2012. City, Street and Citizen: The Measure of the Ordinary. London: Routledge.
  • Heil, T., 2014. Are neighbours alike? Practices of conviviality in Catalonia and Casamance. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17 (4), 452–470.
  • Hewitt, A. 2016. Social and Public Kiosks (artworks). University of Northampton. Available from https://pure.northampton.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/23749043/Social_and_Public_Kiosks.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2021.
  • Horgan, M., 2017. Mundane mutualities: Solidarity and strangership in everyday urban life. In: S. Oosterlynck, N. Schuermans, and M Loopmans, eds. Place, Diversity, Solidarity. London: Routledge, 19–31.
  • Howell, S., 2017. Two or three things I love about ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1), 15–20.
  • Hughes, J., et al., 1995. The role of ethnography in interactive systems design. Interactions, 2 (2), 56–65.
  • Hunt, E. 2017. Boston to fight Islamophobia with viral ‘how to’ transport cartoon. The Guardian, 27 July 2017. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jul/21/boston-fight-islamophobia-viral-how-to-transport-cartoon. Accessed 14 August 2021.
  • Joseph, I., 1998. La ville sans qualités. Paris: Éditions de l’aube.
  • Joseph, I., 2007. L'athlète moral et l'enquêteur modeste. Paris: Economica.
  • Knoblauch, H., 2005. Focused Ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6 (3), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.20
  • Kusenbach, M., 2003. Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool. Ethnography, 4 (3), 455–485.
  • Lofland, L.H., 1985. A World of Strangers: Order and action in public space. Second ed. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
  • Lofland, L.H., 1998. The public realm: Exploring the city's quintessential social territory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Low, S.M., 1996. Spatializing culture: The social production and social construction of public space in Costa Rica. American Ethnologist, 23 (4), 861–879.
  • Low, S.M., 2000. On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Low, S., Simpson, T., and Scheld, S., 2019. Toolkit for the Ethnographic Study of Space (TESS). New York: Public Space Research Group, Center for Human Environments.
  • Low, S.M., Taplin, D.H., and Lamb, M., 2005a. Battery Park City: An Ethnographic Field Study of the Community Impact of 9/11. Urban Affairs Review, 40 (5), 655–682.
  • Low, S.M., Taplin, D.H, and Scheld, S., 2005b. Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Madden, R., 2017. Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Malinowski, B., 1992. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge.
  • Massey, D.B., 2005. For Space. London: SAGE.
  • Miller, D., 2013. Commentary: opportunism, perspective and insight. Social Anthropology, 21 (2), 226–229.
  • Neal, S., et al., 2018. Lived Experiences of Multiculture: The New Social and Spatial Relations of Diversity. London: Routledge.
  • Noble, G., 2013. Cosmopolitan Habits: The Capacities and Habitats of Intercultural Conviviality. Body & Society, 19 (2-3), 162–185.
  • Notarianni, N., et al., 2021. Acoustic bat survey kiosk for public outreach and research. Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science, 94 (1-2), 60–72.
  • Pétonnet, C., 1982. L'Observation flottante. L'exemple d'un cimetière parisien. L'Homme, 22 (4), 37–47.
  • Pink, S., and Morgan, J., 2013. Short-Term Ethnography: Intense Routes to Knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36 (3), 351–361.
  • Public Safety Canada/Sécurité publique Canada, 2017. 2017 Public Report on the Terrorist Threat to Canada: Building a Safe and Resilient Canada. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada/Sécurité publique Canada. Available from: https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/pblc-rprt-trrrst-thrt-cnd-2017/index-en.aspx. Accessed 14 August, 2021.
  • Radice, M., 2009. Street-level Cosmopolitanism: Neighbourhood Shopping Streets in Multiethnic Montréal. In: A. Wise, and S Velayutham, eds. Everyday Multiculturalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 140–157.
  • Radice, M., 2015. Micro-cosmopolitanisms at the urban scale. Identities, 22 (5), 588–602.
  • Radice, M., 2016. Unpacking intercultural conviviality in multiethnic commercial streets. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37 (5), 432–448.
  • Radice, M., Harvey, B., and Turner, S., 2017. Pop-up Ethnography at the Situated Cinema: Confronting Art with Social Science at the Winnipeg Festival of Moving Image. In: M. Radice, and A Boudreault-Fournier, eds. Urban Encounters: Art and the Public. Montréal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 269–293.
  • Rivoal, I., and Salazar, N.B., 2013. Contemporary ethnographic practice and the value of serendipity. Social Anthropology, 21 (2), 178–185.
  • Shah, A., 2017. Ethnography?: Participant observation, a potentially revolutionary praxis. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1), 45–59.
  • Simon, P., 1997. Les usages sociaux de la rue dans un quartier cosmopolite. Espaces et sociétés, 90-91, 43–68.
  • Taplin, D.H., Scheld, S., and Low, S.M., 2002. Rapid ethnographic assessment in urban parks: a case study of Independence National Historic Park. Human Organization, 61 (1), 80–93.
  • Valentine, G., 2008. Living with difference: reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32 (3), 323–337.
  • Valentine, G., 2010. Prejudice: rethinking geographies of oppression. Social & Cultural Geography, 11 (6), 519–537.
  • Valentine, G., Piekut, A., and Harris, C., 2015. Intimate encounters: the negotiation of difference within the family and its implications for social relations in public space. The Geographical Journal, 181 (3), 280–294.
  • Valentine, G., and Sadgrove, J., 2012. Lived difference: a narrative account of spatiotemporal processes of social differentiation. Environment and Planning A, 44 (9), 2049–2063.
  • Valentine, G., and Sadgrove, J., 2014. Biographical Narratives of Encounter: The Significance of Mobility and Emplacement in Shaping Attitudes towards Difference. Urban Studies, 51 (9), 1979–1994.
  • Vertovec, S., 2015 Diversities Old and New: Migration and Socio-Spatial Patterns in New York, Singapore and Johannesburg. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wessel, T., 2009. Does diversity in urban space enhance intergroup contact and tolerance? Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 91 (1), 5–17.
  • Wessendorf, S., 2014. Commonplace Diversity: Social Relations in a Super-Diverse Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Whyte, W.H., 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
  • Whyte, W.H., 1988. City: Rediscovering the centre. New York: Doubleday.
  • Wise, A., 2005. Hope and Belonging in a Multicultural Suburb. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 26 (1-2), 171–186.
  • Wise, A., 2011. Moving Food: Gustatory Commensality And Disjuncture In Everyday Multiculturalism. New Formations, 74 (1), 82–107.
  • Wise, A., and Noble, G., 2016. Convivialities: An Orientation. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37 (5), 423–431.
  • Wise, A., and Velayutham, S., 2014. Conviviality in everyday multiculturalism: Some brief comparisons between Singapore and Sydney. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17 (4), 406–430.
  • Ye, J., 2016a. The ambivalence of familiarity: understanding breathable diversity through fleeting encounters in Singapore's Jurong West. Area, 48 (1), 77–83.
  • Ye, J., 2016b. Spatialising the politics of coexistence: gui ju (规矩) in Singapore. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41 (1), 91–103.
  • Zeisel, J., 1981. Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behaviour Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.