Muslim Secularism by Conduct: Attitudes of Young Australian Muslims to Legal Pluralism and Sharia

References

• Ahmed, F., and Krayem, G., 2021. Understanding Sharia Processes: Women’s Experiences of Family Disputes. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Akbarzadeh, S., and Roose, J.M., 2011. Muslims, Multiculturalism and the Question of the Silent Majority. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 31 (3), 309–325.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, J.A., 2011. A Dual Legal System in Australia: The Formalization of Shari'a. Democracy and Security, 7 (4), 354–373.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A., 2008. Accommodating Shariah Law in Australia's Legal System: Can We? Should We? Alternative Law Journal, 33 (4), 214–219.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar, S., and Krayem, G., 2016. Accommodating Muslims Under Common Law A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H., 1994. State, Society, and Law in Islam: Ottoman Law in Comparative Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobadzadeh, N., 2014. Religious Secularity: A Theological Challenge to the Islamic State. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A., 2002. Legal Pluralism. In: R. Banakar and M. Travers, eds. An Introduction to Law and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 289–310.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, J., 1986. What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18 (24), 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 2006. Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14 (1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M., 1993. Islam: The Alternative. Reading: Garnet Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kashyap, R., and Lewis, A.V., 2013. British Muslim Youth and Religious Fundamentalism: A Quantitative Investigation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36 (12), 2117–2140. doi:10.1080/01419870.2012.672761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khader, B., 2016. Muslims in Europe: The Construction of a “Problem”. BBVA, 2016, 1–24. https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/articles/muslims-in-europe-the-construction-of-a-problem/.
   Google Scholar
• King, M., 1995. Introduction. In: Michael King, ed. God’s Law Versus State Law: The Construction of Islamic Identity in Western Europe. London: Grey Seal, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Korteweg, C.A., and Selby, A.J., 2012. Debating Sharia: Islam, Gender Politics, and Family Law Arbitration. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krayem, G., 2013. Australian Muslim Women: Skilful Legal Navigators in a Plural World. In: A Saeed and H McCue, eds. Family Law and Australian Muslim Women. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 70–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarev, E., 2019. Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War, Gender, and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya. World Politics, 71 (4), 667–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menski, W.F., 2007. Beyond Europe. In: E. Örücü and D. Nelken, eds. Comparative law: A Handbook. London: Bloomsbury, 198.
   Google Scholar
• Moghissi, H., and Ghorashi, H., 2016. Muslim Diaspora in the West: Negotiating Gender, Home and Belonging. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nilan, P., 2017. Muslim Youth in the Diaspora: Challenging Extremism Through Popular Culture. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Otis, G., 2018. Individual Choice of Law for Indigenous People in Canada: Reconciling Legal Pluralism with Human Rights. UC Irvine Law Review, 8 (2), 207.
   Google Scholar
• Possamai, A., et al., 2016. Shari’a and Everyday Life in Sydney. Australian Geographer, 47 (3), 341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Possamai, A., et al., 2013. Defining the Conversation About Shari’a: Representations in Australian Newspapers. Current Sociology, 61 (5-6), 626–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, P., 1986. Legal Pluralism: Introductory Comments. In: Peter Sack and Elizabeth Minchin, eds. Legal Pluralism. Proceedings of the Canberra Law Workshop VII. Canberra: Research School of Social Sciences, (Australian National University), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, A., 2001. The World’s Religious Systems and Democracy: Crafting the ‘Twin Tolerations. In: Alfred Stepan, ed. Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 218–225.
   Google Scholar
• Tamanaha, Z., Lehmann, B.a., and Johan, S., 2021. Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Consequences. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, A.M., 2019. The Promise of the Social Contract: Muslim Perspectives on the Culturalization of Citizenship and the Demand to Denounce Violent Extremism”. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42 (16), 141–158. doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1600710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderlinden, J., 1971. Le Pluralisme Juridique: Essai de Synth ese. In: Jaques Gilissen, ed. Le Pluralisme Juridique. Bruxelles: Universit e Libre de Bruxelles, 19–56.
   Google Scholar
• Von Benda-Beckmann, K., and Turner, B., 2018. Legal Pluralism, Social Theory, and the State. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50 (3), 255–274. doi:10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674.
   Google Scholar
• Voyce, M., and Possamai, A., 2011. Legal Pluralism, Family Personal Laws, and the Rejection of Shari'a in Australia: A Case of Multiple or “Clashing” Modernities?. Democracy and Security, 7 (4), 338–353. doi:10.1080/17419166.2011.617603.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I., 2005. Muslim Laws, Politics and Society in Modern Nation States: Dynamic Legal Pluralisms in England, Turkey and Pakistan. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I., 2012. Towards a Muslim Secularism? An Islamic ‘Twin Tolerations’ Understanding of Religion in the Public Sphere. Turkish Journal of Politics, 3 (2), 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I., 2019. Nation Building, Islamic Law and Unofficial Legal Pluralism: The Cases of Turkey and Pakistan. In: Norbert Oberauer, Yvonne Prief, and Ulrike Qubaja, eds. Legal Legal Pluralism in Muslim Contexts. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I., 2020. Muslims, Sacred Texts, and Laws in the Modern World. In: M. Woodward, and R. Lukens-Bull, eds. Handbook of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Lives. Cham: Springer, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I., 2022. Authoritarianism, Informal Law, and Legal Hybridity: The Islamisation of the State in Turkey. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar