Missing the mark: a response to Bray and Hahn

Bibliography

• Arendt, H. The Origins of Totalitarianism. 2nd ed. New York: Meridian Books, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. Learn to Write Badly: How to Succeed in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. “Anti-Latour.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science A 30, no. 1 (1999): 81–112. doi:10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00038-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, F., and B. Hahn. “‘The Goddess Technology Is a Polyglot’: A Critical Review of Eric Schatzberg, Technology: Critical History of a Concept.” History and Technology 38, no. 4, October 2 (2022): 275–316. doi:10.1080/07341512.2023.2196795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, C. “Epistemic Violence.” Accessed October 23, 2016. https://epistemicviolence.aau.at/index.php/en/home-2/
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, O., W. Conze, and R. Koselleck, eds. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Vol. 8. Stuttgart: E. Klett, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Bud, R. “‘Applied Science’ in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Public Discourse and the Creation of Meaning, 1817–1876.” History and Technology 30, no. 1/2 (2014): 3–36. doi:10.1080/07341512.2014.921416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnino, G. L’invention de la science: la nouvelle religion de l’âge industriel. L’univers historique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E. H. What Is History? First American Edition. The George Macaulay Trevelyan Lectures, 1961. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Costin, C. L. “Introduction: Craft and Social Identity.” Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 8, no. 1 (1998): 3–16. doi:10.1525/ap3a.1998.8.1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, L. “Science Studies and the History of Science.” Critical Inquiry 35, no. 4 (January, 2009): 798–813. doi:10.1086/599584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikötter, F. Mao’s Great Famine: The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958–1962. New York: Walker & Co, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dreiling, M. C., and P. García-Caro. “Editors’ Introduction: Memory Laws or Gag Laws? Disinformation Meets Academic Freedom.” Journal of Academic Freedom 13 (2022): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Febvre, L. “Réflexions sur l’histoire des techniques.” Annales d’histoire économique et sociale 7, no. 36 (1935): 531–535.
   Google Scholar
• Frison, G. “Per una teoria sociologica della tecnologia e dei fatti tecnici: un confronto fra Mauss e Weber.” La Critica Sociologica, no. 122–123 (1997): 13–37.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. Narratives of Innovation: The Invention of Models, 1920–1980. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, J. A. Why Europe? The Rise of the West in World History, 1500–1850. Explorations in World History. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, J. “Ufundi and Tekinolojia in independent Tanzania: specialized Kiswahili lexicons in adult education textbooks, 1960s–1980s.” Technical Artifact, History and Human Sciences no. 15 (February 22, 2022): 17–42. doi:10.4000/artefact.11188.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, B. Technology in the Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Herf, J. Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M. “Explaining the Rise of the West: A Reply to Ricardo Duchesne.” The Journal of the Historical Society 6, no. 4 (December, 2006): 579–599. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5923.2006.00199.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldewey, D., and D. Schauz, eds. Basic and Applied Research: The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. European Conceptual History 4. New York Oxford: Berghahn, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. L. “The Social Role of Intellectuals: Antonio Gramsci and the Italian Renaissance.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 61, no. 1 (1978): 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, D. The Social Life of Inkstones: Artisans and Scholars in Early Qing China. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzman, C., and L. Owens. “The Sociology of Intellectuals.” Annual Review of Sociology 28, no. 1 (2002): 63–90. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140745.
   Google Scholar
• Leroi-Gourhan, A. Milieu et techniques. Paris: Albin Michel, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Long, P. O. Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarquhar, R. The Origins of the Cultural Revolution. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974. http://archive.org/details/originsofcultura0000macf.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, M. “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy.” History and Theory 5 (1965): 33–66. doi:10.2307/2504118.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, L. “Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept.” Technology and Culture 51, no. 3 (2010): 561–577. doi:10.1353/tech.2010.0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, L. “The Idea of ‘Technology’ and Postmodern Pessimism.” In Technology, Pessimism, and Postmodernism, edited by Y. Ezrahi, E. Mendelsohn, and H. Segal, 11–28. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. Techniques, Technology and Civilisation. New York: Durkheim Press/Berghahn Books, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. S. Constructing East Asia: Technology, Ideology, and Empire in Japan’s Wartime Era, 1931-1945. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nikiforova, N. “The Concept of Technology and the Russian Cultural Research Tradition.” Technology and Culture 56, no. 1 (2015): 184–203. doi:10.1353/tech.2015.0009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R. “Gender and the Meanings of Technology: Engineering in the US, 1880-1945.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R. Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America, 1870-1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. Acolytes of Nature: Defining Natural Science in Germany, 1770–1850. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, D., and S. Valeriani. “Technology is Global: The Useful & Reliable Knowledge Debate.” Technology and Culture 62, no. 2 (2021): 327–347. doi:10.1353/tech.2021.0061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, S. “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Bruno Latour.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22, no. 1 (March, 1991): 175–192. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(91)90020-s.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schatzberg, E. Technology: Critical History of a Concept. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Schauz, D. “What is Basic Research? Insights from Historical Semantics.” Minerva 52, no. 3 September 1 (2014): 273–328. doi:10.1007/s11024-014-9255-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauz, D. “Wissenschaftsgeschichte und das Revival der Begriffsgeschichte.” NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 23, no. 1 September 1 (2015): 53–63. doi:10.1007/s00048-015-0127-y.
   Google Scholar
• Schauz, D., and D. Kaldewey. “Diskursanalyse und Historische Semantik in der Wissenschaftsforschung.” In Wissenschaftsforschung, 315–336. Munich: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2023. doi:10.1515/9783110713800-015.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, Translated by Cécile Malaspina and John Rogove. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. New York: Tim Duggan Books, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. “Can the Subaltern Speak.” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271–313. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. B. Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Stanford, Calif: Stanford Univ. Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• van Riessen, H. Filosofie en Techniek. Kampen: J. H. Kok, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Veit-Brause, I. “A Note on Begriffsgeschichte.” History and Theory 20, no. 1 (1981): 61–67. doi:10.2307/2504645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, R. H. The Search for Order, 1877–1920. New York: Hill and Wang, 1967.
   Google Scholar