Moral intuitions, punishment ideology, and judicial sentencing

References

• Albonetti, C. 1986. “Criminality, Prosecutorial Screening, and Uncertainty: Toward a Theory of Discretionary Decision Making in Felony Case Processing.” Criminology 23 (4): 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb01505.x.
   Google Scholar
• Albonetti C A. (1991). An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion. Social Problems, 38 (2): 247–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/800532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alschuler, A. W. 2003. “The Changing Purposes of Criminal Punishment: A Retrospective on the Past Century and Some Thoughts About the Next.” The University of Chicago Law Review 70 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumer, E. P. 2013. “Reassessing and Redirecting Research on Race and Sentencing.” Justice Quarterly 30 (2): 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.682602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieneck, S. 2009. “How Adequate is the Vignette Technique as a Research Tool for Psycho-Legal Research?” In Social Psychology of Punishment of Crime, edited by M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck, and J. Hupfeld-Heinemann, 255–271. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brubacher, M. R. 2019. “Moral Concerns, Criminal Punishment, and Whether Offenders in General or Individual Offenders are Being Considered.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 25 (1): 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, L. C., F. T. Cullen, and V. S. Burton Jr. 2023. “Racial Attitudes and Belief in Redeemability: Most Whites Believe Justice‐Involved Black People Can Change.” Criminology 61 (2): 316–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canton, R. 2015. “Crime, Punishment and the Moral Emotions: Righteous Minds and Their Attitudes Towards Punishment.” Punishment & Society 17 (1): 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514548806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., J. M. Darley, and P. H. Robinson. 2002. “Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2): 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clair, M., and A. S. Winter. 2016. “How Judges Think About Racial Disparities: Situational Decision‐Making in the Criminal Justice System.” Criminology 54 (2): 332–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., and C. S. Yang. 2019. “Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 11 (1): 160–191. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté-Lussier, C., and J. T. Carmichael. 2018. “Public Support for Harsh Criminal Justice Policy and Its Moral and Ideological Tides.” Psychology, Public Policy, & Law 24 (2): 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. T., H. Quan, B. Hemmelgarn, T. Noseworthy, C. A. Beck, E. Dixon, S. Samuel, W. A. Ghali, L. L. Sykes, and N. Jetté. 2015. “Exploring Physician Specialist Response Rates to Web-Based Surveys.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 15 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curry, O. S., M. J. Chesters, and C. J. Van Lissa. 2019. “Mapping Morality with a Compass: Testing the Theory of ‘Morality-As-Cooperation’with a New Questionnaire.” Journal of Research in Personality 78:106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. E., K. Rice, D. R. Van Tongeren, J. N. Hook, C. DeBlaere, E. L. Worthington Jr., and E. Choe. 2016. “The Moral Foundations Hypothesis Does Not Replicate Well in Black Samples.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110 (4): e23–e30. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro Rodrigues, A., O. S. Cunha, J. Q. de Oliveira, R. A. Gonçalves, and A. Sacau-Fontenla. 2023. “Words Matter: Judges’ Value Judgments in Sentence Pronouncements Remarks.” Crime, Law and Social Change 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-023-10097-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. [1933] 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The MacMillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J., R. B. Flemming, and P. F. Nardulli. 1988. The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J., and H. Jacob. 1977. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, R. B., P. F. Nardulli, and J. Eisenstein. 1993. The Craft of Justice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512805505.
   Google Scholar
• FRAZIER C E and BOCK E WILBUR. (1982). Effects of Court Officials on Sentence Severity: Do Judges Make a Difference? Criminology, 20(2): 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1982.tb00460.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. M. 1985. A History of American Law. New York: Simon and Shuster.
   Google Scholar
• Giacomantonio, M., A. Pierro, C. Baldner, and A. Kruglanski. 2017. “Need for Closure, Torture, and Punishment Motivations.” Social Psychology 48 (6): 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L. 1983. “From Simplicity to Complexity: The Development of Theory in the Study of Judicial Behavior.” Political Behavior 5 (1): 7–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989985.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. A., and A. J. Stichman. 2016. “The Influence of Rehabilitative and Punishment Ideology on Correctional officers’ Perceptions of Informal Bases of Power.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 60 (14): 1591–1608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15586414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, A., J. C. Barnes, H. Liu, and F. T. Cullen. 2021. “Beyond a Crime Gene: Genetic Literacy and Correctional Orientation.” American Journal of Criminal Justice 47 (3): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09595-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., J. Haidt, S. Koleva, M. Motyl, R. Iyer, S. P. Wojcik, and P. H. Ditto. 2013. “Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 47:55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., J. Haidt, M. Motyl, P. Meindl, C. Iskiwitch, and M. Mooijman. 2018. “Moral Foundations Theory: On the Advantages of Moral Pluralism Over Moral Monism.” In Atlas of Moral Psychology, edited by K. Gray and J. Graham, 211–222. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., J. Haidt, and J. A. Nosek. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (5): 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., B. A. Nosek, J. Haidt, R. Iyer, S. Koleva, and P. H. Ditto. 2011. “Mapping the Moral Domain.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2): 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2): 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadarics, M., and A. Kende. 2018. “The Dimensions of Generalized Prejudice within the Dual-Process Model: The Mediating Role of Moral Foundations.” Current Psychology 37 (4): 731–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9544-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J., and K. Bumiller. 1983. “Making Sense of Sentencing: Race and Sentencing Outcomes.” In Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, edited by A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, S. Martin, and M. Tonry, 1–54. Washington: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2007. “The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology.” Science 316 (5827): 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., J. Graham, and C. Joseph. 2009. “Above and Below Left–Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations.” Psychological Inquiry 20 (2–3): 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., and C. Joseph. 2004. “Intuitive Ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues.” Daedalus 133 (4): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., and A. J. Harris. 2017. “Applying Moral Foundations Theory to Understanding Public Views of Sexual Offending.” Journal of Sexual Aggression 23 (2): 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1217086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper C A and Harris A J. (2017). Applying moral foundations theory to understanding public views of sexual offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23 (2): 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1217086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. P., and M. Sen. 2019. “Bias and Judging.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (1): 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051617-090650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, R. 2017. “Judicial Rotation as Centripetal Force: Sentencing in the Court Communities of South Carolina.” Criminology 55 (1): 205–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iceland, J., E. Silver, and I. Redstone. 2023. Why We Disagree About Inequality: Social Justice Vs. Social Order. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janoff-Bulman, R., and R. C. Carnes. 2013. “Surveying the Moral Landscape: Moral Motives and Group-Based Moralities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 17 (3): 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313480274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D. 2006. “The Multilevel Context of Criminal Sentencing: Integrating Judge and County Level Influences in the Study of Courtroom Decision Making.” Criminology 44 (2): 259–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00049.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D., J. T. Ulmer, and J. H. Kramer. 2008. “The Social Context of Guidelines Circumvention: The Case of Federal District Courts.” Criminology 46 (3): 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeter, S., N. Hatley, C. Kennedy, and A. Lau. 2017. What Low Response Rates Mean for Telephone Surveys. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, U., K. Bernt Karlson, and A. Holm. 2011. “Comparing Coefficients of Nested Nonlinear Probability Models.” The Stata Journal 11 (3): 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1101100306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. H., and J. T. Ulmer. 2009. Sentencing Guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781588269188.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler, M., J. T. Jost, and S. Noorbaloochi. 2014. “Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in “Moral” Intuitions?” Social Justice Research 27 (4): 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurlychek, M. C., and B. D. Johnson. 2019. “Cumulative Disadvantage in the American Criminal Justice System.” Annual Review of Criminology 2 (1): 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, P. S., J. T. Pickett, S. Bontrager Ryon, and A. E. Kosloski. 2019. “Race, Juvenile Transfer, and Sentencing Preferences: Findings from a Randomized Experiment.” Race and Justice 9 (3): 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717699674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppink, J., K. Winston, and P. O’Sullivan. 2016. “Statistical Significance Does Not Imply a Real Effect.” Perspectives on Medical Education 5 (2): 122–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-016-0256-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurigio, A. J., J. S. Carroll, and L. J. Stalans. 1994. Understanding Judges’ Sentencing Decisions: Attributions of Responsibility and Story Construction.“ In Applications of Heuristics and Biases to Social Issues, edited by Heath, Linda, Tindale, R. Scott, Edwards, John, Posavac, Emil J., Bryant, Fred B., Henderson-King, Eaaron, Suarez-Balcazar, Yolanda, Myers, Judith, 3: 91–115. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 2019. “Focally Concerned About Focal Concerns: A Conceptual and Methodological Critique of Sentencing Disparities Research.” Justice Quarterly 36 (7): 1148–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1686163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFatter, R. M. 1978. “Sentencing Strategies and Justice: Effects of Punishment Philosophy on Sentencing Decisions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (12): 1490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, A., R. Charron-Chénier, and C. Schleifer. 2019. “Measuring Automatic Cognition: Advancing Dual-Process Research in Sociology.” American Sociological Review 84 (2): 308–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419832497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. 1992. “Purposes at Sentencing.” Southern California Law Review 66: 413–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of Race and Sentencing Research: Explaining the Inconsistencies.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 21 (4): 439–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, J. 2012. “Blaming as a Social Process: The Influence of Character and Moral Emotion on Blame.” Law and Contemporary Problems 75 (2): 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, J., and M. H. McDonnell. 2011. “Moral Character, Motive, and the Psychology of Blame.” Cornell Law Review 97 (2): 255–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, L., and L. Young. 2016. “When and Why We See Victims as Responsible: The Impact of Ideology on Attitudes Toward Victims.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 42 (9): 1227–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. E., and L. D. Maxfield. 2004. “Judicial Perspectives on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the Goals of Sentencing: Debunking the Myths.” Alabama Law Review 56 (1): 85.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, A. 2017. “The Decision to Participate in Mediation and Individual Factors: The Role of Moral Foundations and Their Relation to Restorative and Retributive Orientations.” Restorative Justice 5 (2): 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2017.1343420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PICKETT J T and BAKER T. (2014). THE PRAGMATIC AMERICAN: EMPIRICAL REALITY OR METHODOLOGICAL ARTIFACT? Criminology, 52 (2): 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T., F. T. Cullen, S. D. Bushway, T. Chiricis, and G. Alpert. 2018. “The Response Rate Test: Nonresponse Bias and the Future of Survey Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice.” The Criminologist 43 (1): 7–11. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103018.
   Google Scholar
• Pizarro D A, Tannenbaum D and Uhlmann E. (2012). Mindless, Harmless, and Blameworthy. Psychological Inquiry, 23 (2): 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.670100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. H. 2013. Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199917723.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Schanzenbach, M. M., and E. H. Tiller. 2007. “Strategic Judging Under the US Sentencing Guidelines: Positive Political Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23 (1): 24–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheb, J. M., T. D. Ungs, and A. L. Hayes. 1989. “Judicial Role Orientations, Attitudes and Decision Making: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 42 (3): 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298904200313.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, C., and K. Gray. 2018. “The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 22 (1): 32–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel J Z, Crockett M J and Dolan R J. (2017). Inferences about moral character moderate the impact of consequences on blame and praise. Cognition, 167: 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R. 2017. “Moral Foundations, Intuitions of Justice, and the Intricacies of Punitive Sentiment.” Law & Society Review 51 (2): 413–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R., and C. M. Berryessa. 2021. “Remorse, Perceived Offender Immorality, and Lay Sentencing Preferences.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 19 (2): 425–463. online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09488-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R., and E. Silver. 2017. “Why are Conservatives More Punitive Than Liberals? A Moral Foundations Approach.” Law and Human Behavior 41 (3): 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., and R. J. Bosker. 2012. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, D. S. (2021). “A-Priori Sample Size Calculator for Multiple Regression [Software].” https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. 2000. “Thirty Years of Sentencing Reform: The Quest for a Racially Neutral Sentencing Process.“ In Policies, Processes and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System. (Vol. 3) Criminal Justice, edited by Horney, Julie, Vol. 2000. 427–501 . Washington, US: Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. 2009. How Do Judges Decide? The Search for Fairness and Justice in Punishment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452275048.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., and C. L. Britt. 2001. “Judges’ Race and Judicial Decision Making: Do Black Judges Sentence Differently?” Social Science Quarterly 82 (4): 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., and C. Hebert. 1999. “Women and Men Policymakers: Does the Judge’s Gender Affect the Sentencing of Criminal Defendants?” Social Forces 77 (3): 1163–1196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3005975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., J. T. Ulmer, and J. H. Kramer. 1998. “The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black, and Male.” Criminology 36 (4): 763–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg, L., S. J. D’Alessio, and D. Eitle. 2013. “Race and Cumulative Discrimination in the Prosecution of Criminal Defendants.” Race and Justice 3 (4): 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368713500317.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, R., L. Digard, I. I. Melvin Washington, and S. Sorage. 2020. In the Shadows: A Review of the Research on Plea Bargaining. Vera Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. B., S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. 2006. “Loss of Power in Logistic, Ordinal Logistic, and Probit Regression When an Outcome Variable is Coarsely Categorized.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 66 (2): 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405278580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., P. S. Visser, R. Singh, M. Polifroni, A. Scott, S. B. Elson, and P. Rescober. 2007. “People as Intuitive Prosecutors: The Impact of Social-Control Goals on Attributions of Responsibility.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (2): 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. 1996. Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. 2019. “Fifty Years of American Sentencing Reform: Nine Lessons.” Crime and Justice: American Sentencing 48:1–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/701798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., and R. J. Boeckmann. 1997. “Three Strikes and You are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers.” Law and Society Review 31 (2): 237–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, E. L., L. Zhu, and D. Diermeier. 2014. “When Actions Speak Volumes: The Role of Inferences About Moral Character in Outrage Over Racial Bigotry.” European Journal of Social Psychology 44 (1): 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. 1997. Social Worlds of Sentencing: Court Communities Under Sentencing Guidelines. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. 2012. “Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research.” Justice Quarterly 29 (1): 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.624115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. 2019. “Criminal Courts as Inhabited Institutions: Making Sense of Difference and Similarity in Sentencing.” Crime and Justice 48 (1): 483–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/701504.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., and B. D. Johnson. 2017. “Organizational Conformity and Punishment.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 107 (2): 253–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., and J. H. Kramer. 1998. “The Use and Transformation of Formal Decision-Making Criteria: Sentencing Guidelines, Organizational Contexts, and Case Processing Strategies.” Social Problems 45 (2): 248–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., E. Silver, and L. S. Hanrath. 2023. “Back to Basics: A Critical Examination of the Focal Concerns Framework from the Perspective of Judges.” Justice Quarterly 1–24. advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2132274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, T. J., L. B. Holleran, and J. R. Silver. 2019. “Applying Moral Foundations Theory to the Explanation of Capital jurors’ Sentencing Decisions.” Justice Quarterly 36 (7): 1176–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1537400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, A., and Committee for the Study of Incarceration (Etats-Unis), & Gaylin, W. 1976. Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• von Hirsch A. (1992). Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment. Crime and Justice, 16: 55–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/449204.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., S. Graham, and C. Reyna. 1997. “An Attributional Examination of Retributive versus Utilitarian Philosophies of Punishment.” Social Justice Research 10 (4): 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683293.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, K., L. F. Butler, and M. Gertz. 2019. “Saving Children, Damning Adults? An Examination of Public Support for Juvenile Rehabilitation and Adult Punishment.” Criminal Justice Review 44 (4): 470–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016819833141.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldredge, J. 2010. “Judges’ Unequal Contributions to Extralegal Disparities in Imprisonment.” Criminology 48 (2): 539–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00195.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakharin, M., T. C. Bates, and P. K. Jonason. 2021. “Remapping the Foundations of Morality: Well-Fitting Structural Model of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire.” PloS One 16 (10): e0258910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar