Chromosome 3p Microsatellite Allelotyping in Neuroblastoma: A Report on the Technical Hurdles

REFERENCES

• Breen C. J., O'Meara A., McDermott M., et al. Coordinate deletion of chromosome 3p and 11q in neuroblastoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2000; 120: 44–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttikhuis M. E., Powell J. E., Rees S. A., et al. Neuroblastomas with chromosome 11q loss and single-copy MYCN comprise a biologically distinct group of tumours with adverse prognosis. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 531–537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantaz D., Vandesompele J., Van Roy N., et al. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of stage 4 neuroblastoma reveals high frequency of 11q deletion in tumors lacking MYCN amplification. Int J Cancer 2001; 91: 680–686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandesompele J., Speleman F., Van Roy N., et al. Multicentre analysis of patterns of DNA gains and losses in 204 neuroblastoma tumors: how many genetic subgroups are there?. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001; 36: 5–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vandesompele J., Van Roy N., Van Gele M., et al. Genetic heterogeneity of neuroblastoma studied by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1998; 23: 141–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandesompele J., Baudis M., De Preter K., et al. Unequivocal delineation of clinicogenetic subgroups and development of a new model for improved outcome prediction in neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2280–2299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoebeeck J., Michels E., Menten B., et al. High resolution tiling-path BAC array deletion mapping suggests commonly involved 3p21–p22 tumor suppressor genes in neuroblastoma and more frequent tumors. Int J Cancer 2007; 120: 533–538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodeur G. M., Pritchard J., Berthold F., et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1466–1477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gele M., Van Roy N., Jauch A., et al. Sensitive and reliable detection of genomic imbalances in human neuroblastomas using comparative genomic hybridisation analysis. Eur J Cancer 1997; 33: 1979–1982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Roy N., Jauch A., Van Gele M., et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human neuroblastomas: detection of distal 1p deletions and further molecular genetic characterization of neuroblastoma cell lines. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997; 97: 135–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Roy N., Van Limbergen H., Vandesompele J., et al. Combined M-FISH and CGH analysis allows comprehensive description of genetic alterations in neuroblastoma cell lines. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001; 32: 126–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devilee P., Cleton-Jansen A. M., Cornelisse C. J. Ever since Knudson. Trends Genet 2001; 17: 569–573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg E. K., Glendening J. M., Karanjawala Z., et al. Localization of multiple melanoma tumor-suppressor genes on chromosome 11 by use of homozygosity mapping-of-deletions analysis. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 67: 417–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menten B., Buysse K., Vandesompele J., et al. Identification of an unbalanced X-autosome translocation by array CGH in a boy with a syndromic form of chondrodysplasia punctata brachytelephalangic type. Eur J Med Genet 2005; 48: 301–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menten B., Pattyn F., De Preter K., et al. Arraycghbase: an analysis platform for comparative genomic hybridization microarrays. BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6: 124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson M., Stanbridge E. Microcell-mediated chromosome transfer: selective transfer and retention of single human chromosomes into recipient cells of choice. Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook, J. Celis. Academic Press, Inc., New York 1994; 428–433
   Google Scholar
• Shinde D., Lai Y., Sun F., et al. Taq DNA polymerase slippage mutation rates measured by PCR and quasi-likelihood analysis: (CA/GT)n and (A/T)n microsatellites. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 974–980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odelberg S. J., White R. A method for accurate amplification of polymorphic CA-repeat sequences. PCR Methods Appl 1993; 3: 7–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller M. J., Yuan B. Z. Semiautomated resolution of overlapping stutter patterns in genomic microsatellite analysis. Anal Biochem 1997; 251: 50–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J., Zabarovska V. I., Braga E., et al. Loss of heterozygosity in tumor cells requires re-evaluation: the data are biased by the size-dependent differential sensitivity of allele detection. FEBS Lett 1999; 462: 121–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels E., Vandesompele J., Hoebeeck J., et al. Genome wide measurement of DNA copy number changes in neuroblastoma: dissecting amplicons and mapping losses, gains, and breakpoints. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 115: 273–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caren H., Erichsen J., Olsson L., et al. High-resolution array copy number analyses for detection of deletion, gain, amplification and copy-neutral LOH in primary neuroblastoma tumors: four cases of homozygous deletions of the CDKN2A gene. BMC Genomics 2008; 9: 353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader S. A., Fasching C., Brodeur G. M., et al. Dissociation of suppression of tumorigenicity and differentiation in vitroeffected by transfer of single human chromosomes into human neuroblastoma cells. Cell Growth Differ 1991; 2: 245–255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar