Using Mobile Dual Eye-Tracking to Capture Cycles of Collaboration and Cooperation in Co-located Dyads

References

• Abdu, R., & Schwarz, B. (2020). Split up, but stay together: Collaboration and cooperation in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 48(3), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09512-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., & Gašević, D. (2019). Analyzing multimodal multichannel data about self-regulated learning with advanced learning technologies: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachour, K., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010). An interactive table for supporting participation balance in face-to-face collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, 31, 63.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, M., Baker, R. S., & Blikstein, P. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Applications to constructionist research. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9223-7
   Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). Multimodal learning analytics and education data mining: Using computational technologies to measure complex learning tasks. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.32.11
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnard, Q., Lemaignan, S., Zufferey, G., Mazzei, A., Cuendet, S., Li, N., & Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Chilitags 2: Robust fiducial markers for augmented reality and robotics. Chili, Epfl.
   Google Scholar
• Bradski, G., & Kaehler, A. (2000). OpenCV. Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, 3, 120.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American educational research association (Vol. 1, p. 25). Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Buder, J. (2011). Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1114–1117. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cuendet, S., Bumbacher, E., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012, October). Tangible vs. virtual representations: When tangibles benefit the training of spatial skills. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense through Design (pp. 99–108).
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, S., & Begel, A. (2017). Improving communication between pair programmers using shared gaze awareness. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 6245–6290). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, S., & Schneider, B. (2021). Shared gaze visualizations in collaborative interactions: Past, present and future. Interacting with Computers, 33(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwcomp/iwab015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In 21st Century skills: Rethinking how students learn (Vol. 20, pp. 51–76).
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gergle, D., & Clark, A. T. (2011). See what I’m saying?: Using dyadic mobile eye tracking to study collaborative reference. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 435–444). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Leo, D., Aseniso-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., & Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D. (2005). Reusing IMS-LD formalized best practices in collaborative learning structuring. Advanced Technology for Learning, 2(4), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.208.2005.4.208-0865
   Google Scholar
• Jermann, P., Mullins, D., Nüssli, M.-A., Dillenbourg, P. (2011). Collaborative gaze footprints: Correlates of interaction quality. In Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings., Volume I-Long Papers (pp. 184–191).
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaddoura, M. (2013). Think pair share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students’ critical thinking. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(4), 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why unguided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado, R. M., Kay, J., Yacef, K., Schwendimann, B. (2012). June). An interactive teacher’s dashboard for monitoring groups in a multi-tabletop learning environment. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 482–492). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9005-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research (Vols. 1-0). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, N. (1986). Constructive interaction and the iiterative process of understanding. Cognitive Science, 10(2), 151–177. 10.1207/s15516709cog1002_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18(5), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01914.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, K. J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1(1), 43–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scaife, M., & Bruner, J. S. (1975). The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature, 253(5489), 265–266. https://doi.org/10.1038/253265a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. (2020). A methodology for capturing joint visual attention using mobile eye-trackers. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (155), e60670. https://doi.org/10.3791/60670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., & Pea, R. (2013). Real-time mutual gaze perception enhances collaborative learning and collaboration quality. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9181-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Sharma, K., Cuendet, S., Zufferey, G., Dillenbourg, P., & Pea, R. (2018). Leveraging mobile eye-trackers to capture joint visual attention in co-located collaborative learning groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9281-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvarts, A., & Abrahamson, D. (2019). Dual-eye-tracking Vygotsky: A microgenetic account of a teaching/learning collaboration in an embodied-interaction technological tutorial for mathematics. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 22, 100316 10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipitakiat, A., Blikstein, P., Cavallo, D. P. (2004). GoGo board: Augmenting programmable bricks for economically challenged audiences. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Sciences (pp. 481–488).
   Google Scholar
• Siposova, B., & Carpenter, M. (2019). A new look at joint attention and common knowledge. Cognition, 189, 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2007). Meaning making in CSCL: Conditions and preconditions for cognitive processes by groups. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 652–661).
   Google Scholar
• Starr, E., Reilly, J., & Schneider, B. (2018). Toward using multi-modal learning analytics to support and measure collaboration in co-located dyads. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences – Volume 1 (pp. 448–455). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. E., Keirn, Z. A., & D'Mello, S. K. (2018). Multimodal modeling of coordination and coregulation patterns in speech rate during triadic collaborative problem solving. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 21–30). https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3242989
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675 10.1017/S0140525X05000129 PMC: 16262930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103–130).Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tschan, F. (2002). Ideal cycles of communication (or cognitions) in triads, dyads, and individuals. Small Group Research, 33(6), 615–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496402238618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, H. (1937). Process and achievement—A basic problem of education and developmental psychology. Harvard Educational Review.
   Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Using commutative assessments to compare conceptual understanding in blocks-based and textbased programs. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual international conference on international computing education research (pp. 101–110).
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F., & Shaffer, D. W. (2015). Why theory matters more than ever in the age of big data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(2), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.22.2
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2013). Joint attention without gaze following: Human infants and their parents coordinate visual attention to objects through eye-hand coordination. PLOS One, 8(11), e79659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumbach, J., Reimann, P., & Koch, S. C. (2006). Monitoring students’ collaboration in computer-mediated collaborative problem-solving: Applied feedback approaches. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 399–424. https://doi.org/10.2190/2G3G-5M86-8474-76NV
   Google Scholar