Exploring the Teacher’s Role in Discourse and Social Regulation of Learning: Insights from Collaborative Sessions in High-School Physics Classrooms

References

• Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
   Google Scholar
• Borge, M., & White, B. (2016). Toward the development of socio-metacognitive expertise: An approach to developing collaborative competence. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 323–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1215722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottia, M. C., Mickelson, R. A., Jamil, C., Moniz, K., & Barry, L. (2021). Factors associated with college STEM participation of racially minoritized students: A synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 614–648. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211012751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelius, L. L., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Wolfstone-Hay, J. (2013). Organizing collaborative learning experiences around subject matter domains. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 333–350). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembo, M. H. (2001). Learning to teach is not enough—Future teachers also need to learn how to learn. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(4), 23–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23478314
   Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning—Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 22, 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragnić-Cindrić, D. (2020). Uncertainty and social regulation of learning in collaborative inquiry and design tasks in science (Publication No. 28150225) [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]. ProQuest.
   Google Scholar
• Dragnić-Cindrić, D., & Greene, J. A. (2021). Social regulation of learning as a base for successful collaboration (Rapid Community Report Series). Digital Promise, International Society of the Learning Sciences, and the Center for Integrative Research in Computing and Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6854
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrilich, D., & Zack, M. (1997). The power in playing the part. In E. Cohen & R. Lotan (Eds.), Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice (pp. 44–57). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “hands-on” and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education, 103(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). Modelling-based teaching in science education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. (2003). The behaviors, interactions, and perceptions of junior high school students during small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.95.1.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C. D., Shanahan, C., & Project READI. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., & Hesse, F. W. (2018). Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(2), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618808244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A. (2015). Serious challenges require serious scholarship: Integrating implementation science into the scholarly discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A. (2018). Self-regulation in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A. (2022). What can educational psychology learn from, and contribute to, theory development scholarship? Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 3011–3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09682-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J., & Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 83–105). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. V., & Perry, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in first-grade classrooms: On whose authority? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogenkamp, L., van Dijk, A. M., & Eysink, T. H. S. (2021). Analyzing socially shared regulation of learning during cooperative learning and the role of equal contribution: A grounded theory approach. Education Sciences, 11(9), 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., & Baker, M. J. (2018). Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Miller, B. W., Kim, I.-H., Kuo, L.-J., Dong, T., & Wu, X. (2011). Influence of a teacher’s scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 194–230. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210371498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Malmberg, J. (2019). Capturing the dynamic and cyclical nature of regulation: Methodological progress in understanding socially shared regulation in learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(4), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09313-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). Exploring socially shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.267
   Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Koivuniemi, M. (2016). Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 42, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2020). Supporting groups’ emotion and motivation regulation during collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. (2015). Project-based science. Science Teacher, 82(1), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst15_082_01_25
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 313–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B. (2018). Teachers as agents in promoting students’ SRL and performance. Applications for teachers’ dual-role training program. In D. Schunk & J. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 223–239). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Heaysman, O. (2021). A conceptual framework and a professional development model for supporting teachers’ “triple SRL–SRT processes” and promoting students’ academic outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1985502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Kohen, Z. (2017). Promoting preservice teachers’ dual self-regulation roles as learners and as teachers: Effects of generic vs. specific prompts. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9164-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2018). A role for reasoning in a dialogic approach to critical thinking. Topoi, 37(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9373-4
   Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M., Gargroetzi, E., Munson, J., & Chavez, R. (2020). Exploring the role of off-task activity on students’ collaborative dynamics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-J., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., Baker, A. R., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Kim, I.-H., Kuo, L.-J., Miller, B. W., Dong, T., & Wu, X. (2015). Less is more: Teachers’ influence during peer collaboration. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobczowski, N. G. (2019). Building from the inside out: The formation and regulation of emotions in collaborative learning [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]. Carolina Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.17615/vpb8-2p68
   Google Scholar
• Lobczowski, N. G. (2020). Bridging gaps and moving forward: Building a new model for socioemotional formation and regulation. Educational Psychologist, 55(2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1670064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobczowski, N. G., Allen, E. M., Firetto, C. M., Greene, J. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2020). An exploration of social regulation of learning during scientific argumentation discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobczowski, N. G., Lyons, K., Greene, J. A., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2021). Socially shared metacognition in a project-based learning environment: A comparative case study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. M., & Hand, B. (2009). Factors affecting the implementation of argument in the elementary science classroom. A longitudinal case study. Research in Science Education, 39(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9072-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça, P. C. C., & Justi, R. (2013). The relationships between modelling and argumentation from the perspective of the model of modelling diagram. International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2407–2434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.811615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd. ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2014). The social and interactive dimensions of collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 418–438). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K. (2015). Marking the way: School-based interventions that “work”. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Firetto, C. M. (2018). Quality Talk: A blueprint for productive talk. In P. K. Murphy (Vol. Ed.), Classroom discussions in education: Promoting productive talk about text and content (pp. 101–134). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Firetto, C. M., Wei, L., Li, M., & Croninger, R. M. V. (2016). What REALLY works: Optimizing classroom discussions to promote comprehension and critical-analytic thinking. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624215
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Allen, E., Baszczewski, S., Swearingen, A., Wei, L., & Butler, A. M. (2018). Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through Quality Talk discussions. Science Education, 102(6), 1239–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Education Association. (2012). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs”. National Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., & Järvenoja, H. (2014). Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning—A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 68(Supplement C), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Neitzel, C., & Connor, L. (2018). An investigation of the stability and variability in young children’s self-regulated learning behaviors in kindergarten. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1190914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasley, J. D., Trygstad, P. J., & Banilower, E. R. (2016). What does “Implementing the NGSS” mean? Operationalizing the science practices for K–12 classrooms. Horizon Research, Inc. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED587212.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, J., De Backer, F., Kindekens, A., Triquet, K., & Lombaerts, K. (2016). Teacher differences in promoting students’ self-regulated learning: Exploring the role of student characteristics. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 715–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogat, T. K., & Adams-Wiggins, K. R. (2014). Other-regulation in collaborative groups: Implications for regulation quality. Instructional Science, 42(6), 879–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9322-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogat, T. K., & Adams-Wiggins, K. R. (2015). Interrelation between regulatory and socioemotional processes within collaborative groups characterized by facilitative and directive other-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.607930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., & Clay Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, S., Rogat, T. K., Adams-Wiggins, K., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2015). Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 273–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9218-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soter, A. O., Wilkinson, I. A., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., & Edwards, M. (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Spruce, R., & Bol, L. (2015). Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(2), 245–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9124-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, R. G., Lacy, S. J., Crissman, S., & Haddad, N. (2018). Model‐based reasoning about energy: A fourth‐grade case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(8), 1134–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F., & Tsui, C.-Y. (2014). General instructional methods and strategies. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 120–144). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ucan, S. (2017). Changes in primary school students’ use of self and social forms of regulation of learning across collaborative inquiry activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucan, S., & Webb, M. (2015). Social regulation of learning during collaborative inquiry learning in science: How does it emerge and what are its functions? International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2503–2532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1083634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beek, J. A., de Jong, F. P. C. M., Minnaert, A. E. M. G., & Wubbels, T. (2014). Teacher practice in secondary vocational education: Between teacher-regulated activities of student learning and student self-regulation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vauras, M., Volet, S., & Iiskala, T. (2021). Socially-shared metacognitive regulation in collaborative science learning. In D. Moraitou & P. Metallidou (Eds.). Trends and prospects in metacognition research across the life span: A tribute to Anastasia Efklides (pp. 83–102). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Veermans, M., & Järvelä, S. (2004). Generalized achievement goals and situational coping in inquiry learning. Instructional Science, 32(4), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9124-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, L., & Murphy, P. K. (2018). Teacher and student roles: Walking the gradually changing line of responsibility. In P. K. Murphy (Vol. Ed.), Classroom discussions in education: Promoting productive talk about text and content (pp. 30–53). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woods-McConney, A., Wosnitza, M., & Sturrock, K. L. (2016). Inquiry and groups: Student interactions in cooperative inquiry-based science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 842–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1169454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar