Using Debugging as a Platform for Transdisciplinary Learning

References

• Abelson, H., & Sussman, G. J. (1996). Structure and interpretation of computer programs. The MIT Press. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/26092
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Kinnebrew, J. S. (2017). Learner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a computational thinking-based science learning environment. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27(1), 5–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P. (2011). Scaffolding to support learning of ecology in simulation environments. In G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) (pp. 417–419). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_55
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S., Dickes, A., Kinnebrew, J. S., Sengupta, P., & Biswas, G. (2013). CTSiM: A Computational Thinking Environment for Learning Science through Simulation and Modeling. In O. Foley, M. T. Restivo, J. Uhomoibhi & M. Helfert (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU) (pp. 369–378). SciTePress.https://doi.org/10.5220/0004390103690378
   Google Scholar
• Chanier, T., & Lamy, M. N. (2017). Researching technology-mediated multimodal interaction. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 428–443). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Danielak, B. (2022). How code takes shape: Studying a student’s program evolution. Cognition and Instruction, 40(2), 266–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2022.2044330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLiema, D., Kwon, Y. A., Chisholm, A., Williams, I., Dahn, M., Flood, V. J., Abrahamson, D., & Steen, F. F. (2023). A multi-dimensional framework for documenting students’ heterogeneous experiences with programming bugs. Cognition and Instruction, 41(2), 158–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2022.2118279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, L. P., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Let’s dance the “robot hokey-pokey!. Children’s programming approaches and achievement throughout early cognitive development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782614
   Google Scholar
• Germia, E., & Panorkou, N. (2020). Using Scratch programming to explore coordinates. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2018.0032
   Google Scholar
• Hadorn, G. H., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., & Pohl, C. (2008). Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research (U. Wiesmann, & E. Zemp, Eds.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, B. (2008). Problems encountered by novice pair programmers. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/1316450.1316452
   Google Scholar
• Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1049482900010102
   Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, M., & Mannila, L. (2018). Debugging in programming as a multimodal practice in early childhood education settings. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(3), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2030042
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy Elliott, C., Gendreau Chakarov, A., Bush, J. B., Nixon, J., & Recker, M. (2023). Toward a debugging pedagogy: helping students learn to get unstuck with physical computing systems. Information and Learning Sciences, 124(1/2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-03-2022-0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063538
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, N. M., Biswas, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, Á., Grover, S., Wolf, R., Blair, K. P., Chin, D., Conlin, L., Basu, S., & McElhaney, K. (2020). C2STEM: A system for synergistic learning of physics and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09804-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide (Vol. 6). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2006). Learning to troubleshoot: A new theory-based design architecture. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 77–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9001-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y., Biswas, G., Hutchins, N., Snyder, C., Brennan, K., Haduong, P., DesPortes, K., Fong, M., Flood, V. J., & Aalst, O. W. (2020). Turning bugs into learning opportunities: understanding debugging processes, perspectives, and pedagogies. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2020 (pp. 374–381). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6661
   Google Scholar
• Katz, I. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1987). Debugging: An analysis of bug-location strategies. Human-Computer Interaction, 3(4), 351–399. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0304_2
   Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Carver, S. M. (1988). Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 362–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90004-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, A., & Myers, B. (2005). A framework and methodology for studying the causes of software errors in programming systems. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 16(1-2), 41–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2004.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., Chan, E., Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Tempero, E. (2019). Towards a framework for teaching debugging. In Simon & A. Luxton-Reilly (Chairs), Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE’19), (pp. 79–86).ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3286960.3286970
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2019). On Thinking and STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00014-x
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmond, E. (2010). The Scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, R., Fitzgerald, S., Lewandowski, G., Murphy, L., Simon, B., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2008). Debugging: A review of the literature from an educational perspective. Computer Science Education, 18(2), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400802114581
   Google Scholar
• Michaeli, T., & Romeike, R. (2019). Current status and perspectives of debugging in the K12 classroom: A qualitative study [Paper presentation]. 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725282
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1289775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panorkou, N., & Germia, E. F. (2021). Integrating math and science content through covariational reasoning: the case of gravity. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(4), 318–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1814977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panorkou, N., & Germia, E. (2023). Young students’ forms of reasoning about multiple quantities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 43(1), 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Panorkou, N., York, T., & Germia, E. (2023). Examining the “messiness” of transitions between related artifacts. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00112-3
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Computers, children, and powerful ideas. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.5555/1095592
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1987). Technological thinking versus computer criticism. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X016001022
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. (1986). Language-independent conceptual bugs in novice programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.2190/689T-1R2A-X4W4-29J2
   Google Scholar
• Rich, K. M., Strickland, C., Binkowski, T. A., & Franklin, D. (2019). A K-8 debugging learning trajectory derived from research literature. Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 745–751).ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287396
   Google Scholar
• Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2003). Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 137–172. https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.13.2.137.14200
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1982). Some thoughts on problem-solving research and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 27–37). Franklin Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., & Farris, A. (2018). Toward a phenomenology of computational thinking in STEM education. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines: Foundations and Research Highlights (pp. 49–72). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9_4
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvis, D., Clarke-Midura, J., Shumway, J. F., Lee, V. R., & Mullen, S. (2022). Children caring for robots: Expanding computational thinking frameworks to include a technological ethic of care. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 33, 100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100491
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, C., Biswas, G., Emara, M., Grover, S., & Conlin, L. (2019). Analyzing students’ synergistic learning processes in physics and CT by collaborative discourse analysis. In K. Lund, G. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon & M. Baker (Eds.), A Wide Lens: Combining Embodied, Enactive, Extended, and Embedded Learning in Collaborative Settings. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2019) (pp. 360–367). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2019.360
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J. C., & Soloway, E. (1986). Alternatives to construct-based programming misconceptions. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 17(4), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1145/22627.22369
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, C., Rich, K. M., Eatinger, D., Lash, T., Isaacs, A., Israel, M., & Franklin, D. (2021). Action Fractions: The design and pilot of an integrated math + CS elementary curriculum based on learning trajectories. Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1149–1155). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432483
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, M. A., Sengupta, P., Shanahan, M. C., Adams, J. D., & Hachem, M. (2020). Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: A critical review. Studies in Science Education, 56(2), 213–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1755802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Sande, C. C., & Greeno, J. G. (2012). Achieving alignment of perspectival framings in problem-solving discourse. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar