Introducing Students to the Role of Assumptions in Mathematical Activity

References

• Aktaş, M. C. (2016). Turkish high school students’ definitions for parallelograms: Appropriate or inappropriate? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1124931
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A., & van Eerde, D. (2015). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 429–466). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_16
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In D. Philips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 193–224). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810010200707
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
   Google Scholar
• Barwell, R. (2005). Ambiguity in the mathematics classroom. Language and Education, 19(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780508668667
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, S. (2005). Class activities to accompany Mathematics for Elementary Teachers. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1977). The process of education (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk12qst
   Google Scholar
• Byers, W. (2007). How mathematicians think: Using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathematics. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabassut, R., Conner, A. M., İşçimen, F. A., Furinghetti, F., Jahnke, H. N., & Morselli, F. (2012). Conceptions of proof – in research and teaching. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education: The 19th ICMI Study (pp. 169–190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_7
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Jackson, K., & Sharpe, C. D. (2017). Conducting design studies to investigate and support mathematics students’ and teachers’ learning. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 208–233). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 573–604. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Math_Standards1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., Alcock, L., & Jones, I. (2021). What do mathematicians mean by proof? A comparative-judgement study of students’ and mathematicians’ views. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 61, 100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, P. C. (2014). When proofs reflect more on assumptions than conclusions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(2), 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers, M. (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, H. P. (1938). The nature of proof (1938 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). Boureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2002). Orchestrating the multiple voices and inscriptions of a mathematics classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2002.9672139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, C. (2011). Productive ambiguity in the learning of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, T. (2014). Understanding the concept of variable through whole-class discussions: The community of inquiry from a Japanese perspective. In F. K. S. Leung, K. Park, D. Holton, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Algebra teaching around the world. (pp. 129–148). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-707-0_8
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R. (2023). Learning in the disciplines: A conceptual framework. In I. Wilkinson & J. Parr (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Vol. 6. Learning, cognition, and human development (4th ed., pp. 305–314). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.14042-4
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17–51). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grosholz, E. R. (2007). Representation and productive ambiguity in mathematics and the sciences. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646–682. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnke, H. N. (2007). Proofs and hypotheses. ZDM, 39(1–2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-006-0006-z
   Google Scholar
• Jahnke, H. N., & Wambach, R. (2013). Understanding what a proof is: A classroom-based approach. ZDM, 45(3), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0502-x
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C., Doorman, M., & Ohtani, M. (2015). Frameworks and principles for task design. In A. Watson & M. Ohtani (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study 22 (pp. 19–81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C., Pang, J., Schifter, D., & Ng, S. F. (2016). Early algebra: Research into its nature, its learning, its teaching. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32258-2
   Google Scholar
• Kline, M. (1980). Mathematics: The loss of certainty. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K. (2016). A framework for proofs and refutations in school mathematics: Increasing content by deductive guessing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9677-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K. (2017). Fostering empirical examination after proof construction in secondary school geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9731-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2019). Task design principles for heuristic refutation in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(4), 801–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9892-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2020). Interplay between paper-and-pencil activities and dynamic-geometry-environment use during generalisation and proving. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00067-3
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2022). Generating mathematical knowledge in the classroom through proof, refutation, and abductive reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(3), 567–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10086-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K., Jones, K., Ikeda, T., & Narazaki, A. (2017). Proof validation and modification in secondary school geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 47, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K., Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2019). Task design for developing students’ recognition of the roles of assumptions in mathematical activity. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh congress of the European Society for research in mathematics education (pp. 233–240). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K., Tsujiyama, Y., Sakamaki, A., & Koike, N. (2014). Proof problems with diagrams: An opportunity for experiencing proofs and refutations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(1), 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171472
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1992). Practices and problems in teaching authentic mathematics. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, & J. L. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 295–314). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Leatham, K. R., Peterson, B. E., Stockero, S. L., & Zoest, L. R. (2015). Conceptualizing mathematically significant pedagogical opportunities to build on student thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 88–124. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Dinur, S. (2003). Patterns of flexibility: Teachers’ behavior in mathematical discussion. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Bellaria, Italy. Retrieved October 28, 2022, from http://erme.site/cerme-conferences/cerme3/cerme-3-proceedings/
   Google Scholar
• Marmur, O., & Zazkis, R. (2021). Irrational gap: Sensemaking trajectories of irrational exponents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10027-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmur, O., & Zazkis, R. (2022). Productive ambiguity in unconventional representations: “What the fraction is going on?” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(6), 637–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09510-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Educational Policy Research (NIEPR) (2016). Reports of National Assessment of Academic Ability in 2016: Lower secondary school mathematics. NIEPR. http://www.nier.go.jp/16chousa/pdf/16kaisetsu_chuu_suugaku.pdf [in Japanese]
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
   Google Scholar
• Ohtani, M. (2014). Construction zone for the understanding of simultaneous equations: An analysis of one Japanese teacher’s strategy of reflecting on a task in a lesson sequence. In F. K. S. Leung, K. Park, D. Holton, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Algebra teaching around the world (pp. 113–127). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-707-0_7
   Google Scholar
• Ouvrier-Buffet, C. (2006). Exploring mathematical definition construction processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9011-3
   Google Scholar
• Parenti, L., Barberis, M. T., Pastorino, M., & Viglienzone, P. (2007). From dynamic exploration to “theory” and “theorems” (from 6th to 8th grades). In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in schools: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom (pp. 265–284). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901691_016
   Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S. (2019). Theorizing in design research: Methodological reflections on developing and connecting theory elements for language-responsive mathematics classrooms. Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 15, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i15.265
   Google Scholar
• Rupnow, R., & Randazzo, B. (2023). Norms of mathematical definitions: Imposing constraints, permitting choice, or both? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 114(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10227-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G. (2002). A balancing act: Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), 205–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020134209073
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_2
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Straesser, R. (2007). Didactics of mathematics: More than mathematics and school! ZDM, 39(1–2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-006-0016-x
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J. (2007a). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 289–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J. (2007b). Introducing young children to the role of assumptions in proving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701533805
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J. (2016). Proving in the elementary mathematics classroom. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723066.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J., Komatsu, K., Weber, K., & Stylianides, G. J. (2022). Teaching and learning authentic mathematics: The case of proving. In M. Danesi (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive mathematics (pp. 727–761). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_9-1
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Seeking research-grounded solutions to problems of practice: Classroom-based interventions in mathematics education. ZDM, 45(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0501-y
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2022). A learning trajectory for introducing both students and prospective teachers to the notion of proof in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2009). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 314–352. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.3.0314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2014). The role of instructional engineering in reducing the uncertainties of ambitious teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 32(4), 374–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.948682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2023). Promoting elements of mathematical knowledge for teaching related to the notion of assumptions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2023.2172617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Weber, K. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 237–266). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., Knott, L., & Yang, Y. (2015). The relationships between task design, anticipated pedagogies, and student learning. In A. Watson & M. Ohtani (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study 22 (pp. 83–114). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_3
   Google Scholar
• Usiskin, Z., Griffin, J., Witonsky, D., & Willmore, E. (2008). The classification of quadrilaterals: A study of definition. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van Dormolen, J., & Zaslavsky, O. (2003). The many facets of a definition: The case of periodicity. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00006-3
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., & Ohtani, M. (2015). Themes and issues in mathematics education concerning task design: Editorial introduction. In A. Watson & M. Ohtani. (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study 22 (pp. 3–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_1
   Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0606-5
   Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, O., & Shir, K. (2005). Students’ conceptions of a mathematical definition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(4), 317–346. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar