Exploring future applications of the apiculate yeast Hanseniaspora

References

• Barnett JA. A history of research on yeasts 2: Louis Pasteur and his contemporaries, 1850-1880. Yeast. 2000;16(8):755–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drumonde-Neves J, Fernandes T, Lima T, et al. Learning from 80 years of studies: a comprehensive catalogue of non-Saccharomyces yeasts associated with viticulture and winemaking. FEMS Yeast Res. 2021;21:foab017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelliccia C, Antonielli L, Corte L, et al. Preliminary prospection of the yeast biodiversity on apple and pear surfaces from Northern Italy orchards. Ann Microbiol. 2011;61(4):965–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrera RR, Bedriñana RP, Valles, BS. Evaluation of indigenous non-Saccharomyces cider yeasts for use in brewing. Eur Food Res Technol. 2021;247(4):819–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valles BS, Bedriñana RP, Tascón, F et al. Yeast species associated with the spontaneous fermentation of cider. Food Microbiol. 2007;24(1):25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedriñana RP, Simón AQ, Valles, BS. Genetic and phenotypic diversity of autochthonous cider yeasts in a cellar from Asturias. Food Microbiol. 2010;27(4):503–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias CR, Burns JK, Friedrich LM, et al. Yeast species associated with orange juice: evaluation of different identification methods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(4):1955–1961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellacassa E, Trenchs O, Fariña L, et al. Pineapple (ananas comosus L. Merr.) wine production in Angola: characterisation of volatile aroma compounds and yeast native flora. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;241:161–167.:
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Castrillón M, Usman LM, Silva-Bedoya LM, et al. Dominant yeasts associated to mango (Mangifera indica) and rose apple (syzygium malaccense) fruit pulps investigated by culture-based methods. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2019;91(4):e20190052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadkertiová R, Molnárová J, Vránová D, et al. Yeasts and yeast-like organisms associated with fruits and blossoms of different fruit trees. Can J Microbiol. 2012;58(12):1344–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleet GH, Heard GM. Yeast-growth during fermentation. In: Fleet GH, editor. Wine, microbiol biotechnol. Lausanne: Harwood Academic; 1993. p. 27–54.
   Google Scholar
• de Celis M, Ruiz J, Vicente J, et al. Expectable diversity patterns in wine yeast communities. FEMS Yeast Res. 2022;22:foac034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duina AA, Miller ME, Keeney JB. Budding yeast for budding geneticists: a primer on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model system. Genetics. 2014;197(1):33–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin V, Valera M, Medina K, et al. Oenological impact of the Hanseniaspora/Kloeckera yeast genus on wines—a review. Fermentation. 2018;4(3):76. http://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/4/3/76.
   Google Scholar
• Čadež N, Smith MT. Hanseniaspora Zikes (1912). In: The yeasts. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Čadež N, Bellora N, Ulloa R, et al. Hanseniaspora smithiae sp. nov., a novel apiculate yeast species from patagonian forests that lacks the typical genomic domestication signatures for fermentative environments. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:679894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewald M, Lombard L, de Vries M, et al. Diversity of yeast species from dutch garden soil and the description of six novel ascomycetes. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018;18:foy076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čadež N, Bellora N, Ulloa R, et al. Genomic content of a novel yeast species Hanseniaspora gamundiae sp. nov. from fungal stromata (cyttaria) associated with a unique fermented beverage in andean patagonia, Argentina. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Wang M-M, Wang G-S, et al. Hanseniaspora terricola sp. nov., an ascomycetous yeast isolated from tibet. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71:004741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valera MJ, Boido E, Dellacassa E, et al. Comparison of the glycolytic and alcoholic fermentation pathways of Hanseniaspora vineae with Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts. Fermentation. 2020;6(3):78.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Montaño DM, de Jesús Ramírez Córdova J. The fermentative and aromatic ability of kloeckera and Hanseniaspora yeasts. In: Satyanarayana T, Kunze G, editors. Yeast Biotechnol divers appl. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2009. p. 282–301.
   Google Scholar
• Varela C, Borneman AR. Yeasts found in vineyards and wineries. Yeast. 2017;34(3):111–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malfeito-Ferreira M. Yeasts and wine off-flavours: a technological perspective. Ann Microbiol. 2011;61(1):95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escott C, Loira I, Morata A, et al. Wine spoilage yeasts: control strategy. In: Morata A, Loira I, editors. Yeast—industrial appl. London: intechOpen; 2017. p. 89–116.
   Google Scholar
• Bataillon M, Rico A, Sablayrolles JM, et al. Early thiamin assimilation by yeasts under enological conditions: impact on alcoholic fermentation kinetics. J Ferment Bioeng. 1996;82(2):145–150.
   Google Scholar
• Bisson LF. Stuck and sluggish fermentations. Am J Enol Vitic. 1999;50(1):107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciani M, Fatichenti F. Selective sugar consumption by apiculate yeasts. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1999;28(3):203–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granchi L, Ganucci D, Messini A, et al. Oenological properties of Hanseniaspora osmophila and Kloeckera corticis from wines produced by spontaneous fermentations of normal and dried grapes. FEMS Yeast Res. 2002;2(3):403–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano P, Suzzi G. Origin and production of acetoin during wine yeast fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(2):309–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plata C, Millán C, Mauricio JC, et al. Formation of ethyl acetate and isoamyl acetate by various species of wine yeasts. Food Microbiol. 2003;20(2):217–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas V, Gil JV, Piñaga F, et al. Acetate ester formation in wine by mixed cultures in laboratory fermentations. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;86(1-2):181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano P, Fiore C, Paraggio M, et al. Function of yeast species and strains in wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;86(1-2):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano P, Suzzi G, Comi G, et al. Glycerol and other fermentation products of apiculate wine yeasts. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;82(5):615–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciani M, Maccarelli F. Oenological properties of non-Saccharomyces yeasts associated with wine-making. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998;14(2):199–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza LM, Vega-Lopez GA, Fernández de Ullivarri M, et al. Population and oenological characteristics of non-Saccharomyces yeasts associated with grapes of northwestern Argentina. Arch Microbiol. 2019;201(2):235–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedictis D, Bleve M, Tristezza G, et al. An optimized procedure for the enological selection of non-Saccharomyces starter cultures. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Int J Gen Mol Microbiol. 2011;99(2):189–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Maro E, Ercolini D, Coppola S. Yeast dynamics during spontaneous wine fermentation of the catalanesca grape. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;117(2):201–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioch-Skoneczny M, Satora P, Skotniczny M, et al. Quantitative and qualitative composition of yeast microbiota in spontaneously fermented grape musts obtained from cool climate grape varieties ‘rondo’ and ‘regent. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018;18:foy089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Ma H, Hao M, et al. Identification of yeast population dynamics of spontaneous fermentation in Beijing wine region, China. Ann. Microbiol. 2009;59(1):69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andorrà I, Landi S, Mas A, et al. Effect of oenological practices on microbial populations using culture-independent techniques. Food Microbiol. 2008;25(7):849–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza LM, De Nadra MCM, Farías ME. Kinetics and metabolic behavior of a composite culture of Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine related strains. Biotechnol Lett. 2007;29(7):1057–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egli CM, Edinger WD, Mitrakul CM, et al. Dynamics of indigenous and inoculated yeast populations and their effect on the sensory character of riesling and chardonnay wines. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;85(5):779–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Sun F, Wang W, et al. Effects of spontaneous fermentation on the microorganisms diversity and volatile compounds during ‘marselan’ from grape to wine. LWT - Food Sci Technol [Internet. 2020;134:110193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vuuren HJJ, Jacobs CJ. Killer yeasts in the wine industry: a review. Am J Enol Vitic. 1992;43:119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albergaria H, Francisco D, Gori K, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CCMI 885 secretes peptides that inhibit the growth of some non-Saccharomyces wine-related strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86(3):965–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco P, Francisco D, Chambon C, et al. Identification of novel GAPDH-derived antimicrobial peptides secreted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and involved in wine microbial interactions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(2):843–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Cousiño N, Maqueda M, Ambrona J, et al. A new wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer toxin (klus), encoded by a double-stranded RNA virus, with broad antifungal activity is evolutionarily related to a chromosomal host gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(5):1822–1832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renault PE, Albertin W, Bely M. An innovative tool reveals interaction mechanisms among yeast populations under oenological conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(9):4105–4119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Esteve-Zarzoso B, Cocolin L, et al. Viable and culturable populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hanseniaspora uvarum and Starmerella bacillaris (synonym candida zemplinina) during barbera must fermentation. Food Res Int. 2015;78:195–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrafesa A, Capece A, Pietrafesa R, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Hanseniaspora uvarum mixed starter cultures: influence of microbial/physical interactions on wine characteristics. Yeast. 2020;37(11):609–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyt NA, Beaufort S, Divol B, et al. Phenotypic characterization of cell-to-cell interactions between two yeast species during alcoholic fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;37(11):186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng CT, Du X, Wee J. Microbial and chemical analysis of non-Saccharomyces yeasts from chambourcin hybrid grapes for potential use in winemaking. Fermentation. 2021;7(1):15.
   Google Scholar
• Alberico G, Capece A, Mauriello G, et al. Influence of microencapsulation on fermentative behavior of Hanseniaspora osmophila in wine mixed starter fermentation. Fermentation. 2021;7(3):112.
   Google Scholar
• Pina C, António J, Hogg T. Inferring ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts by progressive inactivation. Biotechnol Lett. 2004;26(19):1521–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grangeteau C, Gerhards D, Rousseaux S, et al. Diversity of yeast strains of the genus Hanseniaspora in the winery environment: what is their involvement in grape must fermentation? Food Microbiol. 2015;50:70–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina C, Santos C, Couto JA, et al. Ethanol tolerance of five non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in comparison with a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae - Influence of different culture conditions. Food Microbiol. 2004;21(4):439–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cureau N, Threlfall R, Carbonero F, et al. Fungal diversity and dynamics during grape wine fermentations with different sulfite levels and yeast inoculations. Am J Enol Vitic. 2021;72(3):240–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateraki C, Paramithiotis S, Doulgeraki AI, et al. Effect of sulfur dioxide addition in wild yeast population dynamics and polyphenolic composition during spontaneous red wine fermentation from Vitis vinifera cultivar agiorgitiko. Eur Food Res Technol. 2014;239(6):1067–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grangeteau C, Gerhards D, von Wallbrunn C, et al. Persistence of two non-Saccharomyces yeasts (Hanseniaspora and Starmerella) in the cellar. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuijvers K, van den Heuvel S, Varela C, et al. Alterations in yeast species composition of uninoculated wine ferments by the addition of sulphur dioxide. Fermentation. 2020;6(2):62.
   Google Scholar
• Windholtz S, Vinsonneau E, Farris L, et al. Yeast and filamentous fungi microbial communities in organic red grape juice: effect of vintage, maturity stage, SO2, and bioprotection. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:748416.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Windholtz S, Redon P, Lacampagne S, et al. Non-Saccharomyces yeasts as bioprotection in the composition of red wine and in the reduction of sulfur dioxide. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2021;149:111781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorg J, Kilian S, Radler F. Killer toxin producing strains of the yeasts Hanseniaspora uvarum and Pichia kluyveri. Arch. Microbiol. 1988;149(3):261–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt MJ, Neuhausen F. Killer toxin-secreting double-stranded RNA mycoviruses in the yeasts Hanseniaspora uvarum and Zygosaccharomyces bailii. J Virol. 1994;68(3):1765–1772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radler F, Schmitt MJ, Meyer B. Killer toxin of Hanseniaspora uvarum. Arch Microbiol. 1990;154(2):175–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed AR, Al-Qaysi SAS, Hameed ST. Killer activity of Hanseniaspora uvarum isolated from dates vinegar: partially purification and characterization of killer toxin. Baghdad Sci J. 2019;16:141–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tristezza M, Tufariello M, Capozzi V, et al. The oenological potential of Hanseniaspora uvarum in simultaneous and sequential co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae for industrial wine production. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina K, Boido E, Fariña L, et al. Increased flavour diversity of chardonnay wines by spontaneous fermentation and co-fermentation with Hanseniaspora vineae. Food Chem. 2013;141(3):2513–2521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lleixà J, Martín V, Portillo MC, et al. Comparison of fermentation and wines produced by inoculation of Hanseniaspora vineae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi SJ, Pannella G, Iorizzo M, et al. Sequential inoculum of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae for winemaking campanino on an industrial scale. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;34(11):161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rompkovksi C, Agustini BC, Deffert F, et al. Microbial dynamics in industrial-scale wine fermentation employing Hanseniaspora uvarum β-glucosidase-producer strain. J Food Sci Technol. 2022;59(4):1570–1576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roudil L, Russo P, Berbegal C, et al. Non-Saccharomyces commercial starter cultures: scientific trends, recent patents and innovation in the wine sector. Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 2020;11(1):27–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Wyk N, von Wallbrunn C, Swiegers JH, et al. Biotechnology of wine yeasts. Encycl mycol. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. p. 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Adriana PCS, Regina V, Bruna ASM, et al. Improving production of aromatic compounds by indigenous yeasts in chenin blanc grape must. Afr J Agric Res. 2016;11(28):2433–2442.
   Google Scholar
• Rossouw D, Bauer FF. Exploring the phenotypic space of non-Saccharomyces wine yeast biodiversity. Food Microbiol. 2016;55:32–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestre MV, Maturano YP, Gallardo C, et al. Impact on sensory and aromatic profile of low ethanol malbec wines fermented by sequential culture of Hanseniaspora uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae native yeasts. Fermentation. 2019;5(3):65.
   Google Scholar
• van Wyk N, Scansani S, Beisert B, et al. The use of Hanseniaspora occidentalis in a sequential must inoculation to reduce the malic acid content of wine. Appl Sci. 2022;12(14):6919.
   Google Scholar
• Manzanares P, Rojas V, Genovés S, et al. A preliminary search for anthocyanin-β-D-glucosidase activity in non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2000;35(1):95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Fresno JM, Loira I, Escott C, et al. Application of Hanseniaspora vineae yeast in the production of rosé wines from a blend of tempranillo and albillo grapes. Fermentation. 2021;7(3):141.
   Google Scholar
• Dzialo MC, Park R, Steensels J, et al. Physiology, ecology and industrial applications of aroma formation in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017;41(Supp_1):S95–S128. http://academic.oup.com/femsre/article/41/Supp_1/S95/4084365/Physiology-ecology-and-industrial-applications-of.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson RS. Sensory perception and wine assessment. In: Wine Science, Principles and Applications. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2008. p. 641–685. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123736468500147
   Google Scholar
• Kiene F, Pretorius IS, Rauhut D, et al. Construction and analysis of a yeast for the simultaneous release and esterification of the varietal thiol 3‑sulfanylhexan-1-ol. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(40):11919–11925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas V, Gil JV, Piñaga F, et al. Studies on acetate ester production by non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;70(3):283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasserot Y, Chemardin P, Arnaud A, et al. Evidence for the beta-glucosidase activity and cellobiose fermentation by various kloeckera strains. Acta Biotechnol. 1990;10:451–457.
   Google Scholar
• López S, Mateo JJ, Maicas S. Characterisation of Hanseniaspora isolates with potential aroma-enhancing properties in Muscat wines. South African J Enol Vitic. 2014;35:292–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasserot Y, Christiaens H, Chemardin P, et al. Purification and properties of a beta-glucosidase of Hanseniaspora vineae van der walt and tscheuschner with the view to its utilization in fruit aroma liberation. J Appl Bacteriol. 1989;66:211–219.
   Google Scholar
• Swangkeaw J, Vichitphan S, Butzke CE, et al. Characterization of β-glucosidases from Hanseniaspora sp. and Pichia anomala with potentially aroma-enhancing capabilities in juice and wine. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;27:423–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Zhang R, Sirisena S, et al. Beta-glucosidase activity of wine yeasts and its impacts on wine volatiles and phenolics: a mini-review. Food Microbiol. 2021;100:103859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaensly F, Carla B, Almeida G, et al. Autochthonous yeasts with β -glucosidase activity increase resveratrol concentration during the alcoholic fermentation of Vitis labrusca grape must. J Funct Foods. 2015;19:288–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López S, Mateo JJ, Maicas S. Screening of Hanseniaspora strains for the production of enzymes with potential interest for winemaking. Fermentation. 2015;2:1.
   Google Scholar
• Manzanares P, Ramón D, Querol A. Screening of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts for the production of β-D-xylosidase activity. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999;46(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo JJ, Maicas S, Thie C. Biotechnological characterisation of exocellular proteases produced by enological Hanseniaspora isolates. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2015;50:218–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belda I, Ruiz J, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, et al. Unraveling the enzymatic basis of wine “flavorome”: a phylo-functional study of wine related yeast species. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dizy M, Bisson LF. Proteolytic activity of yeast strains during grape juice fermentation. Am J Enol Vitic. 2000;51:155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly NP, Varela C, Pretorius IS. Not your ordinary yeast: non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14(2):215–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wyk N, Grossmann M, Wendland J, et al. The whiff of wine yeast innovation: strategies for enhancing aroma production by yeast during wine fermentation. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(49):13496–13505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciani M, Comitini F, Mannazzu I, et al. Controlled mixed culture fermentation: a new perspective on the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking. FEMS Yeast Res. 2010;10(2):123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin V, Farina L, Medina K, et al. Oenological attributes of the yeast Hanseniaspora vineae and its application for white and red winemaking. BIO Web Conf. 2019;12:02010.
   Google Scholar
• Carrau F, Henschke PA. Hanseniaspora vineae and the concept of friendly yeasts to increase autochthonous wine flavor diversity. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:702093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin V, Valera MJ, Medina K, et al. Application of Hanseniaspora vineae to improve white wine quality. In Morata A, editor. White wine technology. London: Academic Press; 2022. p. 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Xu D, Duan C, et al. Synergistic effect enhances 2-phenylethyl acetate production in the mixed fermentation of Hanseniaspora vineae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem. 2020;90:44–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana F, Belloch C, Vallés S, et al. Monitoring a mixed starter of Hanseniaspora vineae-Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural must: impact on 2-phenylethyl acetate production. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;151(2):235–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herriaz T, Reglero G, Herriaz M, et al. The influence of the yeast and type of culture on the volatile composition of wines fermented without sulfur dioxide. Am J Enol Vitic. 1990;41:313–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu K, Jin GJ, Xu YH, et al. Wine aroma response to different participation of selected Hanseniaspora uvarum in mixed fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Res Int. 2018;108:119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Shen JY, Duan CQ, et al. Use of indigenous Hanseniaspora vineae and Metschnikowia pulcherrima co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae to improve the aroma diversity of vidal blanc icewine. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan G, Zhang B, Joseph L, et al. Effects of initial oxygenation on chemical and aromatic composition of wine in mixed starters of Hanseniaspora vineae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Food Microbiol. 2020;90:103460.
   Google Scholar
• Lachance MA. Yeast communities in a natural tequila fermentation. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1995;68:151–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzini M, Simonato B, Slaghenau D, et al. Assessment of yeasts for apple juice fermentation and production of cider volatile compounds. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2019;99:224–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graça A, Santo D, Esteves E, et al. Evaluation of microbial quality and yeast diversity in fresh-cut apple. Food Microbiol. 2015;51:179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey WF, Davenport B, Querol A, et al. The role of indigenous yeasts in traditional irish cider fermentations. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(3):647–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzini M, Simonato B, Zapparoli G. Yeast species diversity in apple juice for cider production evidenced by culture-based method. Folia Microbiol. 2018;63(6):677–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh ER, Onkarayya H, Ethiraj S. A note on the yeast flora associated with fermentation of mango. J Appl Bacteriol. 1982;52:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Deak T, Beuchat LR. Yeasts associated with fruit juice concentrates. J Food Prot. 1993;56(9):777–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingorance-Cazorla L, Clemente-Jiménez JM, Martínez-Rodríguez S, et al. Contribution of different natural yeasts to the aroma of two alcoholic beverages. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;19:297–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanprasartsuk OO, Prakitchaiwattana C, Sanguandeekul R, et al. Autochthonous yeasts associated with mature pineapple fruits, freshly crushed juice and their ferments; and the chemical changes during natural fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(19):7500–7509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanprasartsuk O, Prakitchaiwattana C, Sanguandeekul R. Comparison of methods for identification of yeasts isolated during spontaneous fermentation of freshly crushed pineapple juices. J Agric Sci Technol [Internet]. 2013;15:1779–1790. https://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-5776-en.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satora P, Tuszynski T. Biodiversity of yeasts during plum wegierka zwykla spontaneous fermentation. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2005;43:277–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Robles IW, Estarrón-Espinosa M, Díaz-Montaño DM. Fermentative capabilities and volatile compounds produced by Kloeckera/Hanseniaspora and Saccharomyces yeast strains in pure and mixed cultures during agave tequilana juice fermentation. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;108(3):525–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. Assessment of chemical composition and sensorial properties of ciders fermented with different non-Saccharomyces yeasts in pure and mixed fermentations. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020;318:108471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa-Hernández C, Mota-Gutierrez J, Ferrocino I, et al. The challenges and perspectives of the selection of starter cultures for fermented cocoa beans. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019;301:41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwan RF, Wheals AE. The microbiology of cocoa fermentation and its role in chocolate quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2004;44(4):205–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarbu I, Csutak O. The microbiology of cocoa fermentation. In: Grumezescu A, Holban AM, editors. Caffeinated cocoa based beverages sci beverages. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 423–446.
   Google Scholar
• Huch M, Franz CMAP. Coffee: fermentation and microbiota. In: Advances in fermented foods and beverages, improving quality, technologies and health benefits. Heidelberg, Germany: Elsevier Ltd; 2014. p. 501–513.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira Gv de M, Soccol VT, Soccol CR. Current state of research on cocoa and coffee fermentations. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2016;7:50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruta LL, Farcasanu IC. Coffee and yeasts: from flavor to biotechnology. Fermentation. 2021;7:9.
   Google Scholar
• Elhalis H, Cox J, Frank D, et al. The crucial role of yeasts in the wet fermentation of coffee beans and quality. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020;333:108796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho VTT, Zhao J, Fleet G. Yeasts are essential for cocoa bean fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;174:72–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matraxia M, Alfonzo A, Prestianni R, et al. Non-conventional yeasts from fermented honey by-products: focus on Hanseniaspora uvarum strains for craft beer production. Food Microbiol. 2021;99:103806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourbon-Melo N, Palma M, Rocha MP, et al. Use of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii and Hanseniaspora opuntiae to enhance the aromatic profile of beer in mixed-culture fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Microbiol. 2021;95:103678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadaro D, Droby S. Development of biocontrol products for postharvest diseases of fruit: the importance of elucidating the mechanisms of action of yeast antagonists. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2016;47:39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktar W, Sengupta D, Chowdhury A. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2009;2(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hahn M. The rising threat of fungicide resistance in plant pathogenic fungi: botrytis as a case study. J Chem Biol. 2014;7(4):133–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saleh R, Bearth A, Siegrist M. How chemophobia affects public acceptance of pesticide use and biotechnology in agriculture. Food Qual prefer. 2021. 91:104197.
   Google Scholar
• Romanazzi G, Lichter A, Gabler FM, et al. Recent advances on the use of natural and safe alternatives to conventional methods to control postharvest gray mold of table grapes. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2012;63:141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero-Bueso G, Mangieri N, Maghradze D, et al. Wild grape-associated yeasts as promising biocontrol agents against Vitis vinifera fungal pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandhini M, Harish S, Aiyanathan KEA, et al. Glycerol-based liquid formulation of the epiphytic yeast Hanseniaspora guilliermondii isolate YBB3 with multiple modes of action controls postharvest Aspergillus rot in grapes. J Plant Pathol. 2021;103:1253–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu L, Jingfan F, Kai C, et al. Phenylethanol promotes adhesion and biofilm formation of the antagonistic yeast Kloeckera apiculata for the control of blue mold on citrus. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14(4):536–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Cheng Y, Yang M, et al. Mechanisms of action for 2-phenylethanol isolated from Kloeckera apiculata in control of penicillium molds of citrus fruits. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:12–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Qin X, Wu Y, et al. Biocontrol of gray mold of cherry tomatoes with the volatile organic monomer from Hanseniaspora uvarum, trans-cinnamaldehyde. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2019;12:1809–1820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apaliya MT, Zhang H, Yang Q, et al. Hanseniaspora uvarum enhanced with trehalose induced defense-related enzyme activities and relative genes expression levels against Aspergillus tubingensis in table grapes. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2017;132:162–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Dou G, Guo H, et al. Volatile organic compounds of Hanseniaspora uvarum increase strawberry fruit flavor and defense during cold storage. Food Sci Nutr. 2019;7(8):2625–2635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wu C, Qiu S. Yeast diversity investigation of vitis davidii föex during spontaneous fermentations using culture-dependent and high-throughput sequencing approaches. Food Res Int. 2019;126:108582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira-Saab M, Formey D, Torres M, et al. Compounds released by the biocontrol yeast Hanseniaspora opuntiae protect plants against corynespora cassiicola and Botrytis cinerea. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Nie X, Jiang C, et al. The combined use of the antagonistic yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum with β-aminobutyric acid for the management of postharvest diseases of kiwifruit. Biol Control. 2019;137:104019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Zhang H, Li P, et al. Biocontrol of postharvest green mold of oranges by Hanseniaspora uvarum Y3 in combination with phosphatidylcholine. Biol Control. 2016;103:30–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HM, Guo JH, Luo L, et al. Improvement of Hanseniaspora uvarum biocontrol activity against gray mold by the addition of ammonium molybdate and the possible mechanisms involved. Crop Prot. 2010;29:277–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apaliya MT, Zhang H, Zheng X, et al. Exogenous trehalose enhanced the biocontrol efficacy of Hanseniaspora uvarum against grape berry rots caused by Aspergillus tubingensis and penicillium commune. J Sci Food Agric. 2018;98(12):4665–4672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin X, Xiao H, Xue C, et al. Biocontrol of gray mold in grapes with the yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum alone and in combination with salicylic acid or sodium bicarbonate. Postharvest Biol Technol [Internet]. 2015;100:160–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canales XAB, Morales FFC, Varas ES. Gluconobacter cerinus plus Hanseniaspora osmophila for controlling fungal infections in plants and fruits. US 10,993,444. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Angioni A, Caboni P, Garau A, et al. In vitro interaction between ochratoxin a and different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(5):2043–2048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejero P, Martín A, Rodríguez A, et al. In vitro biological control of Aspergillus flavus by Hanseniaspora opuntiae l479 and Hanseniaspora uvarum l793, producers of antifungal volatile organic compounds. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13:663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Albarrán C, Melguizo C, Patiño B, et al. Diversity of mycobiota in spanish grape berries and selection of Hanseniaspora uvarum U1 to prevent mycotoxin contamination. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13:649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Taheur F, Mansour C, Ben Jeddou K, et al. Aflatoxin B1 degradation by microorganisms isolated from kombucha culture. Toxicon. 2020;179:76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendes LP, Merín MG, Zachetti VGL, et al. Impact of antagonistic yeasts from wine grapes on growth and mycotoxin production by Alternaria alternata. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;131(2):833–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendes LP, Merín MG, Fontana AR, et al. Isolation, identification and selection of antagonistic yeast against Alternaria alternata infection and tenuazonic acid production in wine grapes from Argentina. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018;266:14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam SSTH, Howell KS. Drosophila-associated yeast species in vineyard ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:fnv170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostou C, Dorsch M, Rohlfs M. Influence of dietary yeasts on Drosophila melanogaster life-history traits. Entomol Exp Appl. 2010;136:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher PG, Flick G, Rozpedowska E, et al. Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and development. Funct Ecol. 2012;26:822–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellutti N, Gallmetzer A, Innerebner G, et al. Dietary yeast affects preference and performance in Drosophila suzukii. J Pest Sci (2004). 2018;91(2):651–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JC, Dreves AJ, Cave AM, et al. Infestation of wild and ornamental noncrop fruits by Drosophila suzukii (diptera: drosophilidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2015;108:117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rombaut A, Guilhot R, Xuéreb A, et al. Invasive Drosophila suzukii facilitates Drosophila melanogaster infestation and sour rot outbreaks in the vineyards. R Soc Open Sci. 2017;4(3):170117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entling W, Hoffmann C. Single and combined effects of Drosophila suzukii and Drosophila melanogaster on sour rot development in viticulture. J Appl Entomol. 2020;144:153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais PB, Martins MB, Klaczko LB, et al. Yeast succession in the amazon fruit parahancornia Amapa as resource partitioning among drosophila spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(12):4251–4257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby KA, Hernández A, Boundy-Mills K, et al. Associations of yeasts with spotted-wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii; diptera: drosophilidae) in cherries and raspberries. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(14):4869–4873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler JA, Eisen JA, Kopp A. Yeast communities of diverse drosophila species: comparison of two symbiont groups in the same hosts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(20):7327–7336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachance M-A, Gilbert DG, Starmer WT. Yeast communities associated with drosophila species and related flies in an Eastern oak-pine Forest: a comparison with Western communities. J Ind Microbiol. 1995;14(6):484–494.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoang D, Kopp A, Chandler JA. Interactions between drosophila and its natural yeast symbionts- is Saccharomyces cerevisiae a good model for studying the fly-yeast relationship? PeerJ. 2015;3:e1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murgier J, Everaerts C, Farine J, et al. Live yeast in juvenile diet induces species-specific effects on drosophila adult behaviour and fitness. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8873.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spitaler U, Bianchi F, Eisenstecken D, et al. Yeast species affects feeding and fitness of Drosophila suzukii adults. J Pest Sci. 2020;93:1295–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MT, Hamby KA. Differential impacts of yeasts on feeding behavior and development in larval Drosophila suzukii (diptera: drosophilidae). Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palanca L, Gaskett AC, Günther CS, et al. Quantifying variation in the ability of yeasts to attract Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones R, Fountain MT, Günther CS, et al. Separate and combined Hanseniaspora uvarum and Metschnikowia pulcherrima metabolic volatiles are attractive to Drosophila suzukii in the laboratory and field. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher PG, Hagman A, Verschut V, et al. Chemical signaling and insect attraction is a conserved trait in yeasts. Ecol Evol. 2018;8(5):2962–2974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasa R, Navarro-de-la-Fuente L, Gschaedler-Mathis AC, et al. Yeast species, strains, and growth media mediate attraction of Drosophila suzukii (diptera: drosophilidae). Insects. 2019;10:228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidler NH, Liu C, Hamby KA, et al. Volatile codes: correlation of olfactory signals and reception in drosophila-yeast chemical communication. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo-Hernandez R, Lasa R, Montoya P, et al. Efficacy of food-based attractants for monitoring Drosophila suzukii (diptera: drosophilidae) in berry crops. Crop Prot. 2021;150:105797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MS, Ullah F, Badshah H, et al. Bait attractants based on artificial fruit-essence for trapping and monitoring Drosophila suzukii (diptera: drosophilidae) females in Peshawar-Pakistan. Phytoparasitica. 2019;47:179–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Gut L, Grieshop M. Behavior evaluation of food-based attractants for Drosophila suzukii (diptera : Drosophilidae). Environ Entomol. 2017;46(4):878–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble R, Dobrovin-Pennington A, Phillips A, et al. Improved insecticidal control of spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) using yeast and fermented strawberry juice baits. Crop Prot [Internet]. 2019;125:104902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi F, Spitaler U, Castellan I, et al. Persistence of a yeast-based (Hanseniaspora uvarum) attract-and-kill formulation against Drosophila suzukii on grape leaves. Insects. 2020;11:810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehermann G, Spitaler U, Sahle K, et al. Behavioral manipulation of Drosophila suzukii for pest control: high attraction to yeast enhances insecticide efficacy when applied on leaves. Pest Manag Sci. 2022;78(3):896–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori BA, Whitener AB, Leinweber Y, et al. Enhanced yeast feeding following mating facilitates control of the invasive fruit pest Drosophila suzukii. J Appl Ecol. 2017;54:170–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista MRD, Uno F, Chaves RD, et al. Differential attraction of drosophilids to banana baits inoculated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Hanseniaspora uvarum within a neotropical Forest remnant. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble R, Walker A, Whitfield C, et al. Minimizing insecticides for control of spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) in soft fruit using bait sprays. J Appl Entomol. 2021;0:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lin B, Tao Y. Whole‑cell biocatalysts by design. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goretti M, Ponzoni C, Caselli E, et al. Bioreduction of α,β-unsaturated ketones and aldehydes by non-conventional yeast (NCY) whole-cells. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(5):3993–3998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goretti M, Turchetti B, Cramarossa MR, et al. Production of flavours and fragrances via bioreduction of (4R)-(-)-carvone and (1R)-(-)-myrtenal by non-conventional yeast whole-cells. Molecules. 2013;18:5736–5748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyk MS, Van Rensburg E, Rensburg IPB, et al. Biotransformation of monoterpenoid ketones by yeasts and yeast-like fungi. J Mol Catal - B Enzym. 1998;5:149–154.
   Google Scholar
• Goretti M, Ponzoni C, Caselli E, et al. Biotransformation of electron-poor alkenes by yeasts: asymmetric reduction of (4S)-(+)-carvone by yeast enoate reductases. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2009;45:463–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippucci S, Tasselli G, Kenza Labbani FZ, et al. Non-conventional yeasts as sources of ene-reductases for the bioreduction of chalcones. Fermentation. 2020;6:29.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström AM, Almgren A, Carlsson N, et al. Degradation of phytate by pichia kudriavzevii TY13 and Hanseniaspora guilliermondii TY14 in Tanzanian togwa. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;153(1-2):73–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal SK, Ojha N, Das N. Process optimization of benzo[ghi]perylene biodegradation by yeast consortium in presence of ZnO nanoparticles and produced biosurfactant using Box-Behnken design. Front Biol. 2018;13:418–424.
   Google Scholar
• Mandal SK, Das N. Biodegradation of perylene and benzo[ghi]perylene (5-6 rings) using yeast consortium: kinetic study, enzyme analysis and degradation pathway. J Environ Biol. 2018;39:5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhao Z, Kang P, et al. Biological nitrogen removal and metabolic characteristics of a novel aerobic denitrifying fungus Hanseniaspora uvarum strain KPL108. Bioresour Technol. 2018;267:569–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramateftaki PV, Kouvelis VN, Lanaridis P, et al. The mitochondrial genome of the wine yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum: a unique genome organization among yeast/fungal counterparts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6(1):77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freel KC, Friedrich A, Schacherer J. Mitochondrial genome evolution in yeasts: an all-encompassing view. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15(4):fov023. fov023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorello FM, Berná L, Greif G, et al. Genome sequence of the native apiculate wine yeast Hanseniaspora vineae T02/19AF. Genome Announc. 2014;2:19–20.
   Google Scholar
• Langenberg A, Bink FJ, Wolff L, et al. Glycolytic functions are conserved in the genome of the wine yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum, and pyruvate kinase limits its capacity for alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e01580-17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternes PR, Lee D, Kutyna DR, et al. Genome sequences of three species of Hanseniaspora isolated from spontaneous wine fermentations. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e01287-16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seixas I, Barbosa C, Mendes-Faia A, et al. Genome sequence of the non-conventional wine yeast Hanseniaspora guilliermondii UTAD222 unveils relevant traits of this species and of the Hanseniaspora genus in the context of wine fermentation. DNA Res. 2019;26(1):67–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley R, Haridas S, Wolfe KH, et al. Comparative genomics of biotechnologically important yeasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(35):9882–9887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenwyk JL, Opulente DA, Kominek J, et al. Extensive loss of cell-cycle and DNA repair genes in an ancient lineage of bipolar budding yeasts. Plos Bio. 2019;1:e3000255.
   Google Scholar
• Shen XX, Opulente DA, Kominek J, et al. Tempo and mode of genome evolution in the budding yeast subphylum. Cell. 2018;175(6):1533–1545.e20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen XX, Zhou X, Kominek J, et al. Reconstructing the backbone of the saccharomycotina yeast phylogeny using genome-scale data. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2016;6:3927–3939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce KJ, Wang Y, Verma S, et al. Mismatch repair of DNA replication errors contributes to microevolution in the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus. MBio. 2017;8:e00595-17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billmyre RB, Clancey SA, Heitman J. Natural mismatch repair mutations mediate phenotypic diversity and drug resistance in Cryptococcus deuterogattii. Elife. 2017;6:e28802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertin W, Setati ME, Miot-Sertier C, et al. Hanseniaspora uvarum from winemaking environments show spatial and temporal genetic clustering. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz LV, Valera MJ, Delamare APL, et al. A peculiar cell cycle arrest at g2/m stage during the stationary phase of growth in the wine yeas Hanseniaspora vineae. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2022;3:100129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saubin M, Devillers H, Proust L, et al. Investigation of genetic relationships between Hanseniaspora species found in grape musts revealed interspecific hybrids with dynamic genome structures. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guaragnella N, Chiara M, Capece A, et al. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of three Hanseniaspora uvarum indigenous wine strains reveal remarkable biotechnological potential. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:3133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorello F, Valera MJ, Martin V, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic basis of Hanseniaspora vineae’s impact on flavor diversity and wine quality. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e01959–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi W, Li J, Chen Y, et al. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for ethyl acetate biosynthesis. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10(3):495–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Z, Du Y, Yang F, et al. Chromosome genome sequencing and comparative transcriptome-based analyses of Kloeckera apiculata 34-9 unveil the potential biocontrol mechanisms against citrus green mold. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:752529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lleixà J, Martín V, Giorello F, et al. Analysis of the NCR mechanisms in Hanseniaspora vineae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during winemaking. Front Genet. 2019;10:00747.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valera MJ, Boido E, Ramos JC, et al. The mandelate pathway, an alternative to the phenylalanine ammonia lyase pathway for the synthesis of benzenoids in ascomycete yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e00701–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bink FJ. Molekulargenetische und physiologische untersuchungen an der weinhefe Kloeckera apiculata (Hanseniaspora uvarum). diss zur erlangung des doktorgrades der naturwissenschaften; University of Osnabrück. Fachbereich Biol Abteilung Genet. 2010;:129.
   Google Scholar
• Badura J, van Wyk N, Brezina S, et al. Development of genetic modification tools for Hanseniaspora uvarum. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–3027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andorrà I, Berradre M, Rozès N, et al. Effect of pure and mixed cultures of the main wine yeast species on grape must fermentations. Eur Food Res Technol. 2010;231:215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zironi R, Romano P, Suzzi G, et al. Volatile metabolites produced in wine by mixed and sequential cultures of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii or Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett. 1993;15:235–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira N, Mendes F, Guedes de Pinho P, et al. Heavy sulphur compounds, higher alcohols and esters production profile of Hanseniaspora uvarum and Hanseniaspora guilliermondii grown as pure and mixed cultures in grape must. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;124(3):231–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa B, Coppola F, Lombardi SJ, et al. Influence of Hanseniaspora uvarum AS27 on chemical and sensorial characteristics of aglianico wine. Processes. 2021;9:326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canonico L, Comitini F, Oro L, et al. Sequential fermentation with selected immobilized non-Saccharomyces yeast for reduction of ethanol content in wine. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciani M, Beco L, Comitini F. Fermentation behaviour and metabolic interactions of multistarter wine yeast fermentations. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006;108(2):239–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira N, Pina C, Mendes F, et al. Volatile compounds contribution of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii and Hanseniaspora uvarum during red wine vinifications. Food Control. 2011;22:662–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morata A, Loira I, González C, et al. Non-Saccharomyces as biotools to control the production of off-flavors in wines. Molecules. 2021;26:4571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan Y, Zhang BQ, Duan CQ, et al. Effects of different pre-fermentation cold maceration time on aroma compounds of Saccharomyces cerevisiae co-fermentation with Hanseniaspora opuntiae or Pichia kudriavzevii. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2018;92:177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana F, Gil JV, Genovés S, et al. Rational selection of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts for mixed starters based on ester formation and enological traits. Food Microbiol. 2008;25(6):778–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana F, Gil JV, Vallés S, et al. Increasing the levels of 2-phenylethyl acetate in wine through the use of a mixed culture of Hanseniaspora osmophila and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;135(1):68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osburn K, Amaral J, Metcalf SR, et al. Primary souring: a novel bacteria-free method for sour beer production. Food Microbiol. 2018;70:76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellut K, Michel M, Zarnkow M, et al. Application of non-Saccharomyces yeasts isolated from kombucha in the production of alcohol-free beer. Fermentation. 2018;4:66.
   Google Scholar
• Larroque MN, Carrau F, Fariña L, et al. Effect of saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces native yeasts on beer aroma compounds. Int J Food Microbiol. 2021;337:108953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooi TS, Ting ASY, Siow LF. Volatile organic compounds and sensory profile of dark chocolates made with cocoa beans fermented with pichia kudriavzevii and Hanseniaspora thailandica. J Food Sci Technol [Internet]. 2020;122:108977.
   Google Scholar
• Ooi TS, Ting ASY, Siow LF. Influence of selected native yeast starter cultures on the antioxidant activities, fermentation index and total soluble solids of Malaysia cocoa beans : a simulation study. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2020;122:108977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooi TS, Ting ASY, Siow LF. Physicochemical properties, antioxidant content, volatile organic compounds and sensory profile of cocoa beans fermented with yeast starter cultures. J Food Process Preserv. 2021;45:e15893.
   Google Scholar
• Elhalis H, Cox J, Frank D, et al. Microbiological and chemical characteristics of wet coffee fermentation inoculated with Hansinaspora uvarum and Pichia kudriavzevii and their impact on coffee sensory quality. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:713969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhalis H, Cox J, Frank D, et al. Microbiological and biochemical performances of six yeast species as potential starter cultures for wet fermentation of coffee beans. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2021;137:110430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Wang J, Ji X, et al. Selection of non-Saccharomyces yeasts for orange wine fermentation based on their enological traits and volatile compounds formation. J Food Sci Technol. 2018;55(10):4001–4012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu A, Xiao Y, He Z, et al. Use of non-Saccharomyces yeast co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae to improve the polyphenol and volatile aroma compound contents in Nanfeng tangerine wines. J Fungi. 2022;8:128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdichon F, Casaregola S, Farrokh C, et al. Food fermentations: microorganisms with technological beneficial use. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;154(3):87–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei J, Wang S, Zhang Y, et al. Characterization and screening of non-Saccharomyces yeasts used to produce fragrant cider. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2019;107:191–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei J, Zhang Y, Qiu Y, et al. Chemical composition, sensorial properties, and aroma-active compounds of ciders fermented with Hanseniaspora osmophila and torulaspora quercuum in co- and sequential fermentations. Food Chem. 2020;306:125623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilbao A, Irastorza A, Dueñas M, et al. The effect of temperature on the growth of strains of Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in apple juice fermentation. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1997;24(1):37–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrera RR, Bedriñana RP, Hevia, G, et al. Production of spirits from dry apple pomace and selected yeasts. Food Bioprod Process. 2013;91:623–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Zhao GA, Wang LP. Controlled formation of volatile components in cider making using a combination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Hanseniaspora valbyensisyeast species. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;33(3):192–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Montano DM, Delia M-L, Estarron-Espinosa M, et al. Fermentative capability and aroma compound production by yeast strains isolated from agave tequilana weber juice. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2008;42:608–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Pelayo C, Ramírez J, et al. Characterization of kinetic parameters and the formation of volatile compounds during the tequila fermentation by wild yeasts isolated from agave juice. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;35(8):835–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas E, Rêgo B, Augusto C, et al. Cashew wine and volatile compounds produced during fermentation by non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeast. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2020;126:109291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamero A, Ren X, Lamboni Y, et al. Development of a low-alcoholic fermented beverage employing cashew apple juice and non-conventional yeasts. Fermentation. 2019;5:71.
   Google Scholar
• Lara-Hidalgo C, Belloch C, Dorantes-Alvarez L, et al. Contribution of autochthonous yeasts with probiotic potential to the aroma profile of fermented guajillo pepper sauce. J Sci Food Agric. 2020;100:4940–4949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulibaly WH, Bouatenin KJ-PM, Kouamé AK, et al. Use of non-Saccharomyces yeast strains as starter cultures to enhance fermented mango juice production. Sci African. 2020;7:e00226.
   Google Scholar
• Takaya M, Ohwada T, Oda Y. Characterization of the yeast Hanseniaspora vineae isolated from the wine grape ‘yamasachi’ and its use for bread making. Food Sci Technol Res. 2019;25:835–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korres AMN, Buss DS, Ventura JA, et al. Candida krusei and Kloeckera apis inhibit the causal agent of pineapple fusariosis, Fusarium guttiforme. Fungal Biol. 2011;115(12):1251–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taqarort N, Echairi A, Chaussod R, et al. Screening and identification of epiphytic yeasts with potential for biological control of green mold of citrus fruits. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24:3031–3038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Pacheco P, García-Béjar B, Castillo MJ, et al. Potential probiotic and food protection role of wild yeasts isolated from pistachio fruits (Pistacia vera). J Sci Food Agric. 2021;101(6):2201–2209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanens E, Leischtfeld F, Volland S, et al. Screening of lactic acid bacteria and yeast strains to select adapted anti-fungal co-cultures for cocoa bean fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019;290:262–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomé RM, de Oliveira LVB, Sumida CH, et al. In vitro control of Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium italicum by antagonistic yeasts. Semin Agrar. 2020;41:2411–2418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Moyano S, Martín A, Villalobos MC, et al. Yeasts isolated from figs (Ficus carica L.) as biocontrol agents of postharvest fruit diseases. Food Microbiol. 2016;57:45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabaghian S, Braschi G, Vannini L, et al. Isolation and identification of wild yeast from malaysian grapevine and evaluation of their potential antimicrobial activity against grapevine fungal pathogens. Microorganisms. 2021;9:2582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivera M, Delgado N, Cádiz F, et al. Diffusible compounds produced by Hanseniaspora osmophila and Gluconobacter cerinus help to control the causal agents of gray rot and summer bunch rot of table grapes. Antibiotics. 2021;10:664.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado N, Fabiola C, Bravo G. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by Gluconobacter cerinus and Hanseniaspora osmophila displaying control effect against table grape-rot pathogens. Antibiotics. 2021;10:663.
   Google Scholar
• Cai Z, Yang R, Xiao H, et al. Effect of preharvest application of Hanseniaspora uvarum on postharvest diseases in strawberries. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2015;100:52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HM, Guo JH, Cheng YJ, et al. Control of gray mold of grape by Hanseniaspora uvarum and its effects on postharvest quality parameters. Ann Microbiol. 2010;60:31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Luo L, An LC. Characterization of competition for nutrients in the biocontrol of Penicillium italicum by Kloeckera apiculata. Biol Control [Internet]. 2013;67:157–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoud W, Poll L, Jakobsen M. Influence of volatile compounds produced by yeasts predominant during processing of Coffea arabica in east Africa on growth and ochratoxin A (OTA) production by Aspergillus ochraceus. Yeast. 2005;22(14):1133–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Q, Tian S, Jiang A, et al. Isolation and screening of biocontrol antagonists of diseases of postharvest fruits. Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environ Sci. 2001;21:313–316.
   Google Scholar
• Long CA, Deng BX, Deng XX. Commercial testing of Kloeckera apiculata, isolate 34-9, for biological control of postharvest diseases of citrus fruit. Ann Microbiol. 2007;57:203–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclaughlin RJ, Wilson CL, Droby S, et al. Biological control of postharvest diseases of grape, peach, and apple with the yeasts Kloeckera apiculata and Candida guilliermondii. Plant Dis. 1992;76:470–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Xie J, Zhou Y, et al. Inhibitory effect of pichia membranaefaciens and Kloeckera apiculata against Monilinia fructicola and their biocontrol ability of brown rot in postharvest plum. Biol Control. 2017;114:51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabulut OA, Baykal N. Biological control of postharvest diseases of peaches and nectarines by yeasts. J Phytopathol. 2003;151:130–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long CA, Yuan G. Kloeckera apiculata strain (34-9) to control Botrytis cinerea during the pre- and postharvest handling of strawberries. Ann Microbiol. 2009;59:77–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabosto X, Carrau M, Paz A, et al. Grapes and vineyard soils as sources of microorganisms for biological control of Botrytis cinerea. Am J Enol Vitic. 2006;57:332–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basha H, Ramanujam B. Growth promotion effect of pichia guilliermondii in chilli and biocontrol potential of Hanseniaspora uvarum against colletotrichum capsici causing fruit rot. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2015;25:185–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar