Vocabulary comprehension and strategies in name construction among children using aided communication

References

• Allen, A.A., Schlosser, R.W., Brock, K.L., & Shane, H.C. (2017). The effectiveness of aided augmented input techniques for persons with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 149–159. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1338752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, B. (1982). Minspeak: A semantic compaction system that makes self expression easier for communicatively disabled individuals. Byte, 7, 186–202. Retrieved from https://ia802700.us.archive.org/31/items/byte-magazine-1982-09-rescan/1982_09_BYTE_07-09_Computers_and_the_Disabled.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Iacono, T. (1998). Topics of meal-break conversations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 131–146. doi:10.1080/07434619812331278316
   Google Scholar
• Banajee, M., DiCarlo, C., & Stricklin, S.B. (2003). Core vocabulary determination for toddlers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 67–73. doi:10.1080/0743461031000112034
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., Campbell, F., von Tetzchner, S., King, G., & Missiuna, C. (2014). Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: The views of children and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 237–251. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.940464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. (2003). Test for Reception of Grammar (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D.V., Snowling, M.J., Thompson, P.A., & Greenhalgh, T. & The CATALISE Consortium. (2016). CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children. PLoS One, 11, e0158753. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorklund, D.F. (2000). Children's thinking: Developmental function and individual differences (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. (1965). Semantography (Blissymbolics). Sydney: Semantography Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, M.H., Cote, L.R., Maital, S., Painter, K., Park, S.Y., Pascual, L., … Vyt, A. (2004). Cross‐linguistic analysis of vocabulary in young children: Spanish, Dutch, French, Hebrew, Italian, Korean, and American English. Child Development, 75, 1115–1139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00729.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, K.M., & von Tetzchner, S. (2003). Co-construction in graphic language development. In S. von Tetzchner, & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 176–210). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, R. (2000). Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Burdelski, M. (2013). Socializing children to honorifics in Japanese: Identity and stance in interaction. Multilingual: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 32, 247–273. doi:10.1515/multi-2013-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola, M., & Newport, E.L. (2005). Grammatical subjects in home sign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 19249–19253. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509306102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M.V., & Richardson, J.R. (1985). How do children describe spatial relationships? Journal of Child Language, 12, 611–620. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(74)90011-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (2006). Reading and spelling abilities in children with severe speech impairments and cerebral palsy at 6, 9, and 12 years of age in relation to cognitive development: A longitudinal study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 629–634. doi:10.1017/S0012162206001344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saussure, F. (1974). Course in general linguistics. Glasgow, UK: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• D’Odorico, L., Carubbi, S., Salerni, N., & Calvo, V. (2001). Vocabulary development in Italian children: A longitudinal evaluation of quantitative and qualitative aspects. Journal of Child Language, 28, 351–372. doi:10.1017/S0012162206001162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M., Dunn, L.M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale (2nd ed.). London: NFER Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1997). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, D.M. (2007). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., Fletcher, P., Garman, M., Hughes, A., Letts, C., & Sinka, I. (1997). Reynell Developmental Language Scales III. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, A.C., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Rösblad, B., Beckung, E., Arner, M., Ohrvall, A.M., & Rosenbaum, P. (2006). The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 549–54. doi:10.1017/S0012162206001162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, K., Light, J., & Achenbach, A. (2003). The semantic organization patterns of young children: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 74–85. doi:10.1080/0743461031000112061
   Google Scholar
• Fallon, K.A., Light, J.C., & Paige, T.K. (2001). Enhancing vocabulary selection for preschoolers who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 10, 81–94. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/010)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C.A. (1975). Toward a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30027270
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C.A. (1981). “Foreigner talk” as the name of a simplified register. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 28, 9–18. doi:10.1515/ijsl.1981.28.9
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. (1992). Language experience and early language development: From input to uptake. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1992). American parenting of language learning children: Persisting differences in family-child interactions observed in natural home environments. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1096–1105.10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidecker, M.J.C., Paneth, N., Rosenbaum, P.L., Kent, R.D., Lillie, J., Eulenberg, J.B., …. Taylor, K. (2011). Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) for individuals with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53, 704–710. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmquist, E., & Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (1996). Sounds and silence: Interaction in aided language use. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: European Perspectives (pp. 137–152). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.H., & Chen, M.C. (2011). Effect of translucency on transparency and symbol learning for children with and without cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1829–1836. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennische, M., & Zetterlund, M. (2015). Interpretation and construction of meaning of Bliss-words in children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 97–107. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1036117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1992). The Picture Communication Symbols (PCS) (Book II). Solana Beach: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Kame'enui, E.J., & Baumann, J.F. (2012). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D.A., & Yoder, D.E. (1992). Literacy issues in persons with severe speech and physical impairments. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (Volume2, pp. 156–201). New York, NY: Columbia University Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurmanaviciute, R., & Stadskleiv, K. (2017). Assessment of verbal comprehension and non-verbal reasoning when standard response mode is challenging: A comparison of different response modes and an exploration of their clinical usefulness. Cogent Psychology, 4, 1–17. doi:10.1080/23311908.2016.1275416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (2003). Shattering the silence: Development of communicative competence by individuals who use AAC. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 3–38). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L.L., & Fuller, D.R. (1990). The role of iconicity in augmentative and alternative communication symbol learning. In W. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation research (pp. 295–306). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S.K., & Light, J. (2006). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part I – What is a “good” outcome? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 284–299. doi:10.1080/07434610600718693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharaj, S. (1980). Pictogram Ideogram Communication (PIC). Regina, Canada. The George Reed Foundation for the Handicapped.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M.B., & Light, J. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed:” Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55. doi:10.1080/07434610701421007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2009). Cognitive and language acquisition in typical and aided language learning: A review of recent evidence from an aided communication perspective. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25, 7–34. doi:10.1177/0265659008098660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N.W. (1992). Performance is the prize: Language competence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 3–18. doi:10.1080/07434619212331276003
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, J.D. (2002). Memory processes in augmentative and alternative communication. In J. Clibbens, & S. von Tetzchner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Research Symposium for the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 271–288). Toronto, Canada: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, J.D., & Norris, J.A. (2000). Children’s use of memory strategies: Relevance to voice output communication aid use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 79–94. doi:10.1080/07434610012331278924
   Google Scholar
• Page, C.A., & Quattlebaum, P.D. (2012). Severe communication disorders. In D. Hollar (Ed.), Handbook of children with special health care needs (pp. 23–46). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Walter, S., Russell, D., Wood, E., & Galuppi, B. (1997). Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 39, 214–223. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, L., Virella, D., Mjøen, T., da Graça Andrada, M., Murray, J., Colver, A., … de la Cruz, J. (2013). Development of The Viking Speech Scale to classify the speech of children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 3202–3210. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robillard, M., Mayer-Crittenden, C., Roy-Charland, A., Minor-Corriveau, M., & Bélanger, R. (2013). Exploring the impact of cognition on young children’s ability to navigate a speech-generating device. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 347–359. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.849754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameroff, A.J. (2010). A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Development, 81, 6–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01378.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R.W., Shane, H.C., Sorce, J., Koul, R., & Bloomfield, E. (2011). Identifying performing and under-performing graphic symbols for verbs and prepositions in animated and static formats: A research note. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 205–214. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.592217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimpi, P.M., & Huttenlocher, J. (2007). Redirective labels and early vocabulary development. Journal of Child Language, 34, 845–859. doi:10.1177/014272378300401202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 119–136). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (2005). Literacy and augmentative and alternative communication. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Seligman-Wine, J. (2003). Child-driven development of alternative communication: A case study. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative an alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 211–228). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stadskleiv, K., Batorowicz, B., Massaro, M., van Balkom, H., & von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Visual-spatial cognition in children using aided communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stadskleiv, K., von Tetzchner, S., Batorowicz, B., van Balkom, H., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Renner, G. (2014). Investigating executive functions in children with severe speech and movement disorders using structured tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J., Rios, M., & Poirier, M.A. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1–26. doi:10.1017/S0305000909009477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., & Morford, J.P. (2014). An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 187–199. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.940465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Balkom, H., & Donker-Gimbrère, M.W. (1996). A psycholinguistic approach to graphic language use. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 153–170). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (2015). The semiotics of aided language development. Cognitive Development, 36, 180–190. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Introduction to the special issue on aided language processes, development, and use: An international perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 141–149. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.610356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., Grove, N., (2003). The development of alternative language forms. In S., von Tetzchner, & N. Grove, (Eds.), Augmentative an alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 1–27). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1996). Words and strategies: Conversations with young children who use aided language. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.) Augmentative and Alternative Communication: European perspectives (pp. 65–88). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (2000). Introduction to augmentative and alternative communication: Sign teaching and the use of communication aids for children, adolescents, and adults with developmental disorders (2nd ed). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 11, 2143–2152. doi:10.1177/0956797613488145
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2009). The social context of language and literacy development. In O. A. Barbarin & B. H. Wasik (Eds.), Handbook of child development and early education: Research to practice (pp. 271–302). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werker, J.F., & Yeung, H.H. (2005). Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 519–527. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar