Simulation of other-initiated repair using AAC

References

• Auer, P., Bauer, A., & Hörmeyer, I. (2020). How can the "autonomous speaker" survive in atypical interaction? The case of anarthria and aphasia. In Atypical interaction (pp. 373–408). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28799-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Auer, P., & Hörmeyer, I. (2017). Achieving intersubjectivity in augmented and alternative communication (AAC): Intercorporeal, embodied and disembodied practices. In J. S. &. J. S. J. (eds). Chr. Meyer (Ed.), Intercorporeality. emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 323–360.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:Oso/9780190210465.003.0013
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Bloch, S. (2020). Communication disorders, enchrony, and other-participation in repair. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 34(10–11), 887–893. doi:10.1080/02699206.2020.1749886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(4), 272–282. doi:10.1080/07434610400005614
   Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., Levinson, S. C. (2015). Never say no… How the brain interprets the pregnant pause in conversation. PLoS One, 10(12), e0145474. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2020). Conversational expectations get revised as response latencies unfold. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(6), 766–779. doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1590609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2012). Verbal Hygiene. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. (Vol. 23). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L.G. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Ed.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1992). Contextualizing discourse: The prosody of interactive repair. In The contextualization of language (p. 337). John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/pbns.22.20cou
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, C., & Givon, T. (1997). Memory and conversation: Cognitive, communicative, and social perspectives (T. Givon (ed.)). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., & Enfield, N. J. (2015). Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLoS One, 10(9), e0136100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69–101. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2015). Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality (Vol. 1, pp. 385–387). De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/jso-2015-0014
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2017). How we talk: The inner workings of conversation. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2022). Enchrony. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive Science, 13(4), e1597. doi:10.1002/wcs.1597
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Roots of human sociality. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher-Rood, K., & Higginbotham, J. (2019). Interacting with persons who have ALS: Time, media, modality, and collaboration via speech-generating devices. Topics in Language Disorders, 39(4), 370–388. doi:10.1097/TLD.0000000000000195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodenough-Trepagnier, C., & Prather, P. (1981). Communication systems for the nonvocal based on frequent phoneme sequences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24(3), 322. doi:10.1044/jshr.2403.322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781139016735
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2007). Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. Person reference in interaction. In Enfield, N. J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2007). Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives (Vol. 7) (pp. 255–280). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486746.012
   Google Scholar
• Hill, K. J. (2001). The development of a model for automated performance measurement and the establishment of performance indices for augmented communicators under two sampling conditions [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Pittsburgh. University of Pittsburgh ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (Publication No. 3013368)
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1992). Evaluation of selection savings across five assistive communication technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8(4), 258–272. doi:10.1080/07434619212331276303
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., Bisantz, A., Sunm, M., Adams, K., & Yik, F. (2009). The effect of context priming and task type on augmentative communication performance. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(1), 19–31. doi:10.1080/07434610802131869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., Fulcher-Rood, K., & Seale, J. (2016). Time and timing in ALS in interactions involving individuals with ALS, their unimpaired partners, and their speech generating devices. In M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner?: Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 201–229). J&R Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., Satchidanand, A., Arecy, F., & Bizovi, J. (2022). Timing in SGD-mediated turn-taking and meaning-making [Paper presentation]. [Conference Session] Atypical Interaction Conference, June 27). Newcastle, England.
   Google Scholar
• Huhtamäki, M. (2015). The interactional function of prosody in repair initiation: Pitch height and timing of va "what"in Helsinki Swedish. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 48–66. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H. (2015). The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 250. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K. A., Malani, M. D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of Communication Partner Instruction on the Communication of Individuals using AAC: A Meta-Analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(4), 271–284. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C. (2012). Repair. In Sidnell and Stivers, The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley Blackwell. 229–256. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch12
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. E. (2001). Effect of speech rate on the comprehension and subjective judgements of synthesized narrative discourse. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Buffalo Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 1836. UMI No. 3010837).
   Google Scholar
• Koester, H. H., & Arthanat, S. (2017). Text entry rate of access interfaces used by people with physical disabilities: A systematic review. Assistive Technology, 30(3), 151–163. doi:10.1080/10400435.2017.1291544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, H. H., & Levine, S. (1998). Model simulations of user performance with word prediction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(1), 25–36. doi:10.1080/07434619812331278176
   Google Scholar
• Koroschetz, J. (2020). The impact of composition delay in augmentative communication talk-in-interaction [Master’s thesis State University of New York at Buffalo]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (Publication No. 28090991).
   Google Scholar
• Lesher, G., Moulton, B., & Higginbotham, D. J. (1998). Techniques for augmenting scanning communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(2), 81–101. doi:10.1080/07434619812331278236
   Google Scholar
• Marascuilo, L. A., & McSweeney, M. (1977). Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, A. (2016). No further after 30 years, still can’t speak fast enough [Conference Session]. International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communication International Conference, August 8. Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Perrachione, T. K., & Wong, P. C. M. (2007). Learning to recognize speakers of a non-native language: Implications for the functional organization of human auditory cortex. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 1899–1910. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robillard, A. B. (1999). Meaning of a disability: The lived experience of paralysis. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.2307/413107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar. Cambridge University Press. pp. 52–133. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205–243. doi:10.1093/applin/21.2.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, J. M., Bisantz, A. M., & Higginbotham, J. (2020). Interaction symmetry: Assessing augmented speaker and oral speaker performances across four tasks. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(2), 82–94. doi:10.1080/07434618.2020.1782987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. E., Higginbotham, D. J., Lesher, G. W., Moulton, B. M., & Mathy, P. (2006). The development of an automated method for analyzing communication rate in augmentative and alternative communication. Assistive Technology, 18(1), 107–121. doi:10.1080/10400435.2006.10131910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35(03), 367–392. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2008). Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(2), 333–348. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar