Speaking partners’ talk in transitions between symbols in conversations that use speech-output technologies

References

• Auer, P., & Hörmeyer, I. (2017). Achieving intersubjectivity in Augmented and Alternative Communication (AAC): Intercorporeal, embodied and disembodied practices. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality. Emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 323–360). University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)), 24(2), 123–138. doi:10.1080/07434610701830587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2016). Co-construction, asymmetry, and multimodality in children`s conversations. In M. M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 177–198). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Speaker transfer in children’s peer conversation: Completing communication-aid-mediated contributions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(1), 37–53. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.767490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)), 23(4), 336–348. doi:10.1080/07434610701390350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). Communication aid use in children’s conversation: Time, timing, and speaker transfer. In H. Gardner & M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interaction in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 249–268). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (2013). Turn-constructional units and the transition-relevance place. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 150–166). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–568. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2013). Epistemics in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 370–394). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hidecker, M. J. C., Paneth, N., Rosenbaum, P. L., Kent, R. D., Lillie, J., Eulenberg, J. B., Chester, K., Johnson, B., Michalsen, L., Evatt, M., & Taylor, K. (2011). Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53(8), 704–710. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (2009). In-person interaction in AAC: New perspectives on utterances, multimodality, timing, and device design. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 154–160. doi:10.1044/aac18.4.154
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., Fulcher, K., & Seale, J. (2016). Time and timing in interactions involving individuals with ALS, their unimpaired partners and their speech generating devices. In M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 199–228). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jagoe, C., & Smith, M. (2016). Relevance in the context of multimodality and aided communication. In M. M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 229–246). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D.N. Sudnow (Ed.) Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcription symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C. (2013). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Koivisto, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2021). OKAY as a response to informings in Finnish. In E. Betz, A. Deppermann, L. Mondada, & M-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), OKAY across languages: Toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction (Vol. 34, pp. 205–234). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 731. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. (2013). Everyone and no one to turn to: Intellectual roots and contexts for conversation analysis. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 11–31). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2011). Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 542–552. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 32–56). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Norén, N., Svensson, E., & Telford, J. (2013). Participants’ dynamic orientation to folder navigation when using a VOCA with a touch screen in talk-in-interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md: 1985)), 29(1), 20–36. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.767555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 308–330). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, I. (2014). TAIKE 2.0. Käyttöopas [user’s guide]. Kehitysvammaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Savolainen, I., Klippi, A., Tykkyläinen, T., Higginbotham, J., & Launonen, K. (2020). The structure of participants’ turn-transition practices in aided conversations that use speech-output technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(1), 18–30. doi:10.1080/07434618.2019.1698654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, I. (2020). Co-constructing structure and social action of aided turn in everyday conversations (Dissertation). University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Accounts of conduct in interaction: Interruption, overlap, and turn taking. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 287–321). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurd Pilesjö, M. (2013). On the use of bodily action and vocalizations as recourses and methods when claiming and completing turns in aided interaction. In N. Noren, C. Samuelsson, & C. Plejert (Eds.), Aided communication in everyday interaction (pp. 59–94). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurd Pilesjö, M. S., & Rasmussen, G. (2011). Exploring interaction between a non-speaking boy using aided AAC and his everyday communication partners: Features of turn organizing and turn design. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 2(2), 183–213. doi:10.1558/jircd.v2i2.183
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (2011). Knowledge, morality, and affiliation in social interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 3–24). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, A., Plejert, C., & Rönnberg, J. (2011). The role of active participation in interaction for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication and Medicine, 7(2), 165–175. doi:10.1558/cam.v7i2.165
   Google Scholar
• Tegler, H., Demmelmaier, I., Johansson, M. B., & Norén, N. (2020). Creating a response space in multiparty classroom settings for students using eye-gaze accessed speech-generating devices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985)), 36(4), 203–213. doi:10.1080/07434618.2020.1811758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Von Tetzchner, S., & Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985)), 27(3), 141–149. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.610356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar