Programmatic approach to use of technology in communication instruction for children with dual sensory impairments

References

• Buckley, W. L. (1992, March). Our kids use computers too Paper presented at the Hilton-Perkins National Conference on Deaf-Blindness, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericks, H. D. B., & Baldwin, V. L. (1987). Individuals with sensory impairments: Who are they? How are they educated?
   Google Scholar
• In L. Goetz, D. Guess, & K. Stremel-Campbell (Eds.), Innova-tive program design for individuals with dual sensory impair-ments (pp. 3–12). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeister, A. M., & Friedman, S. G. (1986). The application of technology to the education of persons with severe handicaps. In. R. H. Homer, L. H. Meyer, & H. D. B. Fredericks (Eds.), Education of learners with severe handicaps: Exemplary serv-ice strategies (pp. 351–367). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., & Smith, D. (1982). Microcomputers and severely handicapped students: Are we overbidding our hand? Ameri-can Annals of the Deaf, 127, 665–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. A., & Miller, J. F. (1989). Can microcomputers be used to teach communication skills to students with mental retarda-tion? Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 24, 32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, P., & Mirenda, P. (1988). A computer-supported commu-nication approach for a child with severe communication, vis-ual, and cognitive impairments: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Matas, J. A., Mathy-Laikko, P., Beukelman, D. R., & LeGresley, K. (1985). Identifying the nonspeaking population: A demo-graphic study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P., Iacono, T., Ratcliff, A., Villarruel, F., Yoder, D., & Vanderheiden, G. (1989). Teaching a child with multiple disabilities to use a tactile augmentative communication device. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Iacono, T. (1990). Communication option for persons with severe and profound disabilities: State of the art and future directions. The Journal of the Association for Per-sons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S., Buckley, W., Truesdell, A., Riggio, M., Collins, M., & Boardman, B. (1990). Barriers to the use of assistive technol-ogy with children: A survey. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 84, 532–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Karlan, G. (1988). Selecting augmentative commu-nication interventions: A critique of candidacy criteria and a proposed alternative. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention, (2nd ed., pp. 321–339). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., & Stremel-Campbell, K. (1987). Share and share alike: Conventional gestures to emergent language for learners with sensory impairments. In L. Goetz, D. Guess, & K. Stremel-Campbell (Eds.), Innovative program design for indi-viduals with dual sensory impairments (pp. 49–75). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Sall, N., & Mar, H. H. (1992). Technological resources for stu-dents with deaf-blindness and severe disabilities. New York: Center for Adaptive Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Schweigert, P., & Rowland, C. (1992). Early communication and microtechnology: Instructional sequence and case studies of children with severe multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 273–286.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey, E., & Downing, J. (1987). Nonsymbolic commu-nication development: Theoretical concepts and educational strategies. In L. Goetz, D. Guess, & K. Stremel-Campbell (Eds.), Innovative program design for individuals with dual sensory impairments (pp. 15–48). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey, E., & Ernst, B. (1989). Theoretical orientation and research in nonsymbolic development. In E. Siegel-Causey & D. Guess (Eds.), Enhancing nonsymbolic communication in-teractions among learners with severe disabilities (pp. 15–51). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Stremel-Campbell, K., & Matthews, J. (1988). Development of emergent language. In M. Bullis & G. Fielding (Eds.), Commu-nication development in young children with deaf-blindness: Literature review(pp. 165–201). Monmouth, OR: Oregon State System of Higher Education, Teaching Research Division.
   Google Scholar
• Thorley, B., Ward, J., Binepal, T., & Dolan, K. (1991). Communi-cating with printed words to augment signing: Case study of a severely disabled deaf-blind child. Augmentative and Alterna-tive Communication, 7,80–87.
   Google Scholar
• Wacker, D. P., Wiggins, B., Fowler, M., & Berg, W. K. (1988). Training students with profound or multiple handicaps to make requests via microswitches. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 331–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S. F., Horn, E. H., & Hill, E. W. (1987). Some innovative educational applications of advanced technologies. In L. Goetz, D. Guess, & K. Stremel-Campbell (Eds.), Innovative program design for individuals with dual sensory impairments (pp. 283–309). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• York, J., Nietupski, J., & Hamre-Nietupski, S. (1985). A decision-making process for using microswitches. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 214–223.
   Google Scholar