Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech delivered at normal and slow presentation rates

References

• American National Standards Institute. (1969). Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1969). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, L. (1993). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of listeners' recall of synthesized speech texts. Unpublished master's the-sis, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Drazek, A. L. (1992). Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech by naive versus experienced listeners. Unpublished master's thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service. (1992). TOEFLR Test of Written English Guide. Princeton, NJ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Foulds, R. (1980). Communication rates of nonspeech expres-sion as a function of manual tasks and linguistic constraints. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Rehabilita-tion Engineering (pp. 83–87). Washington, DC: RESNA, Asso-ciation for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (1988). Perception of synthetic speech by adults and children: Research on processing voice output from text-to-speech systems. In L. E. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally impaired: Clinical practice and research (pp. 206–248). Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (1987). Speech comprehension and lexical failure. In R. Reilly, (Ed.), Communication failure in dialogue and dis-course: Detection and repair processes (pp. 81–98). New York: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, J., & Attridge, C. (1975). A guide of developers and users of observation systems and manuals. American Educational Research Journal, 12, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1991). The effect of communication device output mode on conversational performance (Continuation report, Grant No. DC00034-03). Bethesda, MD: National Insti-tute on Deafness and Other Communicative Disorders.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1993). Comprehension of VOCA produced texts: Referent recall, intelligibility and short term memory. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Baird, L., & Duchan, J. D. (1994). Discourse analysis of listeners' summaries of synthesized speech pas-sages. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Drazek, A., & Sussman, J. (in review). The effect of experience on the single-word intelligibility and dis-course comprehension of synthetic speech. Manuscript sub-mitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Scally, C. (1994). The effect of voice output method on VOCA mediated social interaction. Manu-script in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Lundy, D. C., & Scally, C. (1993a). The effect of output method on the comprehension of voice output communication aids. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Lundy, D. C., & Scally, C. (1993, in review). Qualitative ratings of discourse summaries: Definitions and procedure manual. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. E. (1988). Studying conversations of augmentative communication sys-tem users. In L. E. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally impaired: Clinical practice and research (pp. 206–248). Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. J., & Franklin, L. D. (1982). Recall of passages of synthetic speech. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 203–206.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, E., & Schiefflen, B. (1976). Topic as a discourse notion: The study of topic on the conversations of children and adults. In L. Li, (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 335–382). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse compre-hension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Re-view, 95,163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J., McKoon, G., & Keenan, J. M. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196–214.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1990). Cognitive science and augmenta-tive and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 7,186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Lively, S. E., Ralston, J. V., Pisoni, D. B., & Rivera, S. M. (1990). Effects of text structure on the comprehension of natural and synthetic speech (Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 16). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Labora-tory, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. S., Greene, B. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 566–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., Feustel, T. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1983). Capacity demands in short-term memory for synthetic and natural speech. Human Factors, 25, 17–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P. A. (1982). Comprehension of augmentative and alternative communication device output methods. Unpub-lished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1990). A comparison of intelli-gibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 6,61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Oiler, J. W. (1979). Language tests at schools. London: Longman Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B., Manous, L. M., & Dedina, M. J. (1987). Compre-hension of natural and synthetic speech: Effects of predict-ability on the verification of sentences controlled for intelli-gibility. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 303–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B., Ralston, J. V., & Lively, S. E. (1990). Some new directions in research on comprehension of synthetic speech (Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 16). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Ralston, J. V., Pisoni, S. E., Lively, S. E., Greene, B. G., & Mullenix, J. W. (1991). Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: Word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening times. Human Factors, 33,471–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., & Allen, G. D. (1993). Comprehension of syn-thetic speech with three text-to-speech systems using a sentence verification paradigm. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9,126–133.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, P. (1980). When communication breaks down: Levels of coherence in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 1, 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. (1989). JMPR (version 2.05). Cary, NC: Author. Scally, C. (1993). The effect of voice output method on VOCA mediated social interaction. Unpublished master's thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L., Kwiatkowski, J., & Hoffman, K. (1984). A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 456–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1989). Analyzing quantitative behavioral observation data. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, M. (1987). Reaction time as a metric for the intelligibility of synthetic speech. In J. A. Waterworth (Ed.), Speech and language-based interaction with machines: Towards the con-versational computer. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Lloyd, L. L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. Blackstone, (Ed.), Aug-mentative communication: An introduction (pp. 49–162). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Asso-ciation.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatagiri, H. S. (1991). Effects of rate and pitch variations on the intelligibility of synthesized speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7,284–289.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, T. (1991). Assistive speech I/O in the 1990s: Current priorities and future trends. In Proceedings of the Califor-nia State University, Northridge Technology Conference on Voice I/O and Persons with Disabilities (pp. 1-21). Northridge, CA: Office of Disabled Student Services, California State University.
   Google Scholar