Vocabulary-use patterns in preschool children: Effects of context and time sampling

References

• Augmentative Communication Service, Hugh MacMillan Medical Centre. (1984). Programming guidelines: Vocabulary selec-tion. Unpublished manuscript, Hugh MacMillan Medical Cen-tre, Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Jones, R., & Rowan, M. (1989). Frequency of word usage by nondisabled peers in integrated preschool classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 243–248.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., McGinnis, J., & Morrow, D. (1991). Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Augmentative and alterna-tive communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Yorkston, K., Poblete, M., & Naranjo, C. (1984). Frequency of word occurrence in communication samples produced by adult communication users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 360–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowen, J., Madsen, S., & Hilferty, A. (1985). TESOL: Techniques and procedures. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Bredekamp, S. (Ed.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate prac-tice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. (1981). A format for selecting vocabulary for the nonspeaking child. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 12, 140–145.
   Google Scholar
• Carta, J., Schwarz, I., Atwater, J., & McConnell, S. (1991). Developmentally appropriate practice: Appraising its useful-ness for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Child-hood Special Education, 11, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (1986). Listen to your child. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M. (August, 1990). Comparing developmental lan-guage samples to vocabulary selected for nonspeaking chil-dren. Paper presented at the meeting of the Fourth Biennial International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & More, L. (1992). An initial vocabulary for nonspeaking preschool children based on developmental and environmental language sources. Augmentative and Alterna-tive Communication, 8, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, C. (1984). Children's talk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, S., & Kraat, A. (1992). Use of a developmental model of language acquisition: Applications to children using AAC sys-tems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, C., Sefton, K., & Landry, R. (1986). Sample size and type-token ratios for oral language of preschool children. Jour-nal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. (1992). Individual language learning styles and aug-mentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Karlan, G., & Lloyd, L. (1983). Considerations in the planning of communication intervention: Selecting a lexicon. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 8, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, E. 0., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1976). Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversation of children and adults. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 337–383). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahey, M., & Bloom, L. (1977). Planning the first lexicon: Which words to teach first. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 340–349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLure, M., & French, P. (1981). A comparison of talk at home and at school. In G. Wells (Ed.), Learning through interaction: The study of language and development. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, C., Beukelman, D. Brockhous, J., & Kast, L. (1994). "What are you talking about?" A semantic analysis of preschool children's conversational topics in home and preschool set-tings. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Mein, R., & O'Connor, N. (1960). The study of the oral vocabu-laries of severely subnormal patients. Journal of Mental Defi-ciency Research, 4, 130–143.
   Google Scholar
• Mentis, M. (1991). Topic management in the discourse of normal and language-impaired children. Journal of Childhood Com-munication Disorders, 14, 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1981). Assessing language production in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1985). Designing pictorial communication systems for physically able-bodied students with severe handicaps. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C., & St. Louis, K. (1988). Communication program-ming for persons with severe handicaps: Vocal and augmen-tative strategies. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Develop-ment, 38, 1–2. Serial #149.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. (1992). Performance is the prize: Language compe-tence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Odom, S., & McEvoy, M. (1988). Integration of young children with handicaps and normally developing childen. In S. Odom & M. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps: An empirical base (pp. 241–268). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, S., Vanderhoof, D., & Beukelman, D. (1993). Topic and vocabulary use patterns of elderly women. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9,95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Tattershall, S., & Creaghead, N. (1985). A comparison of com-munication at home and school. In D. Ripich & F. Spinelli (Eds.), School discourse problems (pp. 29–51). San Diego: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tawney, J., & Gast, D. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Templin, M. (1957). Certain language skills in children: Their development and interrelationships. Child Welfare Monograph No. 26. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tice, R., & Beukelman, D. (1989). Vocabulary Frequency Ana-lyzer Software (Research Version 1.0) [Computer program]. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning lan-guage and using language to learn. Portsmouth, NH: Heine-mann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Dowden, P., Honsinger, M., Marriner, N., & Smith, K. (1988). A comparison of standard and user vocabulary lists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 189–210.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Honsinger, M., Dowden, P., & Marriner, N. (1989). Vocabulary selection: A case report. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 5, 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Smith, K., & Beukelman, D. (1990). Extended com-munication samples of augmented communicators I: A com-parison of individualized versus standard single word vocabularies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 217–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar