Effects of selection techniques and array sizes on short-term visual memory

References

• Allen, H. (1957). A new picture series for preschool vision testing. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 44, 38–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruning, J.L., & Kintz, B.L. (1977). Computational handbook of statistics. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. (1985). Picsyms categorical dictionary. Lawrence, KS: Baggeboda Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A., & Coleman, C. (1987). Selecting augmentative commu-nication systems by matching client skills and needs to system characteristics. Seminars in Speech and Language, 8, 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A., Coleman, C., Preszler, A., & Dahlquist, D. (1983). A hierarchy of augmentative communication system charac-teristics useful for matching devices to clients' needs and skills. Proceedings from the Sixth Annual Conference on Re-habilitation (pp. 185–186). Bethesda, MD: Rehabilitation Engi-neering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, W., & Taylor, H. (1966). Visual detection in relation to display size and redundancy of critical elements. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, W., & Wessel, D. (1966). Reaction time in relation to display size and correctness of responses in forced-choice visual signal detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 369–373.
   Google Scholar
• Foulds, R. (1985). Observations on interfacing in nonvocal com-munication. In C. Barry & M. Byrne (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communication Through Technology for the Physically Disabled (pp. 46–51). London: The International Cerebral Palsy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Goodenough-Trepagnier, C., & Felts, T. (1987). Cognitive abili-ties implicated in the use of communication aids. Proceedings from the Tenth Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Engineer-ing (pp. 174–176). Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Engineer-ing Society of North America, Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, J. (1985). Interfacing the motor impaired for control and communication. In J. Webster, A. Cook, W. Tompkins, & G. Vanderheiden (Eds.), Electronic devices for rehabilitation (pp. 190–229). London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1982). Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders, 2, 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., & Vanderheiden, G. (1980). Augmentative communi-cation techniques. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Nonspeech language and communication: Analysis and intervention (pp. 259–301). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heckathorne, C., & Childress, D. (1982). An integrated computer system for anticipatory text generation and device control by individuals with severe motor impairment. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Computing to Aid the Handicapped. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klatzky, R. (1984). Memory and awareness. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report. Report of the International Project on Communication Aids for the Severely Speech Impaired. Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Kreidfeldt, J., Goodenough-Trepagnier, C., & Rosen, M. (1984). Clinicians' paired judgments of cognitive demands imposed by nonvocal communication devices. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering (pp. 351–352). Bethesda, MD: Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Kulikowski, S. (1986). Scanning data types in nonvocal commu-nication. Paper presented at Closing the Gap Conference, Minneapolis, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. (1986). Future needs and direc-tions in augmentative communication. In S. Blackstone & D. Bruskin (Eds.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 471–494). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M., & Esser, J. (1991). The effect of direct selection and circular scanning on visual sequential recall. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 43–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ratcliff, A. (1987). A comparison of two message selection tech-niques used in augmentative communication systems by nor-mal children with differing cognitive styles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing aug-mentative and alternative communication: Strategies for/earn-ers with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H., Lipschultz, R., & Shane, C. (1982). Facilitating the communicative interactions of nonspeaking persons in large residential settings. Topics in Language Disorders, 2, 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, auto-matic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. (1976). Providing the child with a means to indicate. In G. Vanderheiden & K. Grilley (Eds.), Nonvocal communication techniques and aids for the severely physically handicapped (pp. 20–76). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. (1984). High and low technology approaches in the development of communication systems for severely physically handicapped persons. Exceptional Education Quar-terly, 4(4), 40–56.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Harris-Vanderheiden, D. (1976). Communi-cation techniques and aids for the non-vocal severely handi-capped. In L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and inter-vention strategies(pp. 607–652). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur, R. (1980). Nonspeech symbol systems summary chapter. In R. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Nonspeech language and commu-nication: Analysis and intervention (pp. 81–90). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, D., & Kraat, A. (1983). Intervention issues in nonspeech communication. In J. Miller, D. Yoder, & R. Schiefelbush (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language intervention. ASHA Reports, 12, 27–51. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Lan-guage-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar