Special education teacher attitudes toward AAC: preliminary survey

References

• Aldridge, J. T., & Clayton, G. A. (1987). Elementary teachers' cog-nitive and affective perceptions of exceptional children. Psy-chological Reports, 61, 91–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and con-sultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, P., & Webb, R. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Long-man.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherson, M. J., & Goldstein, B. L. (1992). Quality design of focus groups in early childhood special education research. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 334–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1988). Promoting the acquisition and general-ization of conversational skills by individuals with severe dis-abilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N., & Jorgensen, C. M. (1991). Integrating AAC instruction into regular education settings: Expounding on best practices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 204–214.
   Google Scholar
• Durban, J., & Rivers, D. (1990). Statistical software tools (version 2). Reference manual. Pasadena, CA: Durban Rivers Research.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. H. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M. A., Shrum, J. L., Harding, J. R., & Cuthbert, A. M. (1988). Teacher belief: Definitions, findings, and directions. Educational Policy, 2, 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Walker, H., & Darch, C. (1988). Relationship between teacher effectiveness and their tolerance for handicapped stu-dents. Exceptional Children, 54, 433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giangreco, D. R., Cloninder, C., Edelman, S., & Schattman, R. (1993). "I've counted Jon": Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Chil-dren, 59,359–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76,569–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, T. L. (1993). The handbook for focus group research. New York: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (1987). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. E. (1992). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for non-native speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (1984). Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Kircaali-Iftar, G., & Diamond, C. T. P. (1993). Who has a problem, the student or the teacher? Differences in teacher beliefs about their work with at risk and integrated exceptional students. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 40, 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knodel, J. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D.L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35–51). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1987). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report. Madison, WI: Trace Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1993). Quality control in focus group research. In D.L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 65–89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lauer, J. M., & Asher, J. W. (1988). Composition research: Empir-ical designs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Likert, R. (1967). The method of constructing an attitude scale. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Attitude theory and measurement (pp. 90–95). New York: John Wiley & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, P. A., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Roles and responsibilities of spe-cial education teachers serving on teams delivering AAC services. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 200–214.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, E. A., & McCarthy, H. D. (1989). Enhancing teacher efficacy in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 21, 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Melograno, V. J., & Loovis, M. (1991). Effects of field-based train-ing on teachers' knowledge and attitudes and the motor profi-ciency of their handicapped students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 1211–1214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirenda, P., Iacono, T., & Williams, R. (1990). Communication options for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. New-bury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3–20). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, G., Wakefield, P., Walker, D., & Solberg, S. (1994). Teacher preferences for collaborative relationships: Relation-ship to efficacy for teaching in prevention-related domains. Psy-chology in the Schools, 31, 221–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, K. (1993). Improving survey questionnaires through focus groups. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 105–118). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, C. A., & Furman, G. C. (1992). Qualitative research in spe-cial education: An evaluative review. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (pp. 1–32). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, C. A., Hayden, L., Wandschneider, M., Peterson, K., & Richarz, S. (1989). Development of integrated preschools: A qualitative inquiry into sources of resistance among parents, administrators, and teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 353–364.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, L., & Altmaier, E. (1994). The relationship of prior training and previous teaching experience to self-efficacy among graduate teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 35,481–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, I., & Enochs, L. (1990). Toward the development of an ele-mentary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74, 625–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17, 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (1994). The impact of an inservice to promote cooper-ative learning on the stability of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenberg, R., & Arminger, G. (1990). Linear covariance struc-tures. A computer program for the analysis of linear models incorporating measurement error disturbances as well as struc-tural disturbances. Seattle, WA: RJS Software.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., & Iacono, T. (1993). Selecting augmentative com-munication devices for persons with severe disabilities: Some factors for educational teams to consider. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 18, 133–146.
   Google Scholar
• Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1993). Teacher efficacy and stu-dent problem as factors in special education referral. Journal of Special Education, 27, 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1994). Teachers' thinking about diffi-cult to teach students. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Goetz, L. (1997). Teacher sense of efficacy and inclu-sion of students with severe disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: The-ory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tomes, L., & Sanger, D. D. (1986). Attitudes of interdisciplinary team members toward speech-language services in public schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing in the Schools, 17, 230–240.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic data collection. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. J., & Silverman, H. (1991). Teachers' assumptions and beliefs about the delivery of services to exceptional children. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 198–206.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, B., Knodel, J., & Sittitrai, W. (1993). Focus groups and sur-veys as complementary research methods: A case example. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 118–137). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teachers' sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6,137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar