Health literacy needs and preferences for a technology-based intervention to improve college students’ sexual and reproductive health

References

• Finer LB, Zolna MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011;84(5):478–485. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Economic and social council. Commission on population and development. Adolescents and youth: Report of the Secretary-General. E/CN.9/2012/2. Accessed October 19, 2020. New York, NY. Available at: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N12/220/30/PDF/N1222030.pdf?OpenElement
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Adolescents and Young Adults. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/life-stages-populations/adolescents-youngadults.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2018. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Widman L, Nesi J, Kamke K, Choukas-Bradley S, Stewart JL. Technology-based interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancy among youth. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62(6):651–660. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Reproductive health, unintended pregnancy. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/contraception/unintendedpregnancy/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Parks C, Peipert JF. Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):681–688. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel MA, Coor A, Beltran O, Becasen J, Pearson WS, Dittus P. The state of sexual health services at U.S. colleges and universities. J Am Coll Health. 2018;66(4):259–268. doi:10.1080/07448481.2018.1431896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Bureau of Labor Statistics. College enrollment and work activity of recent high school and college graduates summary. 2020. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/hsgec.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller MB. Comparison of community college students’ sexual health dimensions. Commun Coll J Res Pract. 2019;43(6):401–415. doi:10.1080/10668926.2018.1490216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C S, C H, C R, B B. Peer-to-peer education of college females on sexual health. UJER. 2018;6(5):844–847. doi:10.13189/ujer.2018.060505.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg ME, Hannan PJ, Lust KA, Lechner KE, Garcia C, Frerich EA . Sexual health resources at Minnesota colleges: Associations with students’ sexual health behaviors. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013;45(3):132–138. doi:10.1363/4513213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogel J, Fajiram S, Morgan PD. Sexual health information seeking on the Internet: Comparisons between White and African American college students. ABNF J. 2010;21(4):79–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horgan Á, Sweeney J. University students’ online habits and their use of the Internet for health information. Comput Inform Nurs. 2012;30(8):402–408. doi:10.1097/NXN.0b013e3182510703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SU, Yeon SS. Credibility and usefulness of health information on Facebook: A survey study with U.S. college students. Inf Res Int Electr J 2016;21(4).
   Google Scholar
• Montagni I, Cariou T, Feuillet T, Langlois E, Tzourio C. Exploring digital health use and opinions of university students: Field survey study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(3):e65. doi:10.2196/mhealth.9131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daher J, Vijh R, Linthwaite B, et al. Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996–2017). BMJ Open Nov Open. 2017;7(11):e017604. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson E, Free C, Morris TP, et al. Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2017;14(12):e1002479. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widman L, Golin CE, Noar SM, Massey J, Prinstein MJ. Projectheartforgirls.com: Development of a web-based HIV/STD prevention program for adolescent girls emphasizing sexual communication skills. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28(5):365–377. doi:10.1521/aeap.2016.28.5.365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon AR, Koerner K. User-centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation. Clin Psychol (New York). 2016;23(2):180–200. doi:10.1111/cpsp.12154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopp AR, Parisi KE, Munson SA, Lyon AR. A glossary of user-centered design strategies for implementation experts. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9(6):1057–1064. doi:10.1093/tbm/iby119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veinot TC, Campbell TR, Kruger DJ, Grodzinski A. A question of trust: User-centered design requirements for an informatics intervention to promote the sexual health of African-American youth. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(4):758–765. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell BH, Ryan GW. Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bersamin M, Fisher DA, Marcell AV, Finan LJ. Reproductive health services: Barriers to use among college students. J Community Health. 2017;42(1):155–159. doi:10.1007/s10900-016-0242-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q. 1989;13(3):319–340. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions, and behavioral impacts. Int J Man-Mach Stud. 1993;38(3):475–487. doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, (HLS-EU) Consortium Health Literacy Project European, et al. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Dopp AR, Parisi KE, Munson SA, Lyon AR. Aligning implementation and user-centered design strategies to enhance the impact of health services: Results from a concept mapping study. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1(1):17. doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00020-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. 2012. Accessed 2020/10/19. Available at: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/applied-thematic-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Escoffery C, Miner KR, Adame DD, Butler S, McCormick L, Mendell E. Internet use for health information among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2005;53(4):183–8. doi:10.3200/jach.53.4.183–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbaffi L, Rowley J. Trust and credibility in web-based health information: A review and agenda for future research. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e218. doi:10.2196/jmir.7579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkie EM, Benson M, Moreno M. Adolescents’ views regarding uses of social networking websites and text messaging for adolescent sexual health education. Am J Health Educ. 2011;42(4):205–212. doi:10.1080/19325037.2011.10599189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cassidy C, Bishop A, Steenbeek A, Langille D, Martin-Misener R, Curran J. Barriers and enablers to sexual health service use among university students: A qualitative descriptive study using the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):581. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3379-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carroll C, Lloyd-Jones M, Cooke J, Owen J. Reasons for the use and non-use of school sexual health services: A systematic review of young people’s views. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34(3):403–410. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdr103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia CM, Lechner KE, Frerich EA, Lust KA, Eisenberg ME. College students’ preferences for health care providers when accessing sexual health resources. Public Health Nurs. 2014;31(5):387–394. doi:10.1111/phn.12121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen HK, Trondsen M, Kummervold PE, Gammon D, Hjortdahl P. Patients who use E-mediated communication with their doctor: new constructions of trust in the patient-doctor relationship. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(2):238–248. doi:10.1177/1049732305284667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayboy LM, Sepolen A, Mezoian T, et al. Girl talk: A smartphone application to teach sexual health education to adolescent girls. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(1):23–28. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2016.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine D, McCright J, Dobkin L, Woodruff AJ, Klausner JD. SEXINFO: A sexual health text messaging service for San Francisco youth. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(3):393–395. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.110767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedsider. About Bedsider. https://www.bedsider.org/about_us
   Google Scholar
• Chen E, Mangone ER. A systematic review of apps using mobile criteria for adolescent pregnancy prevention (mCAPP). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(4):e122. doi:10.2196/mhealth.6611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayboy LM, McCoy K, Thamotharan S, Zhu E, Gil G, Houck C. The use of technology in the sexual health education especially among minority adolescent girls in the United States. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30(5):305–309. doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guse K, Levine D, Martins S, et al. Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: A systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(6):535–543. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.03.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhi ER, Daley EM, Fuhrmann HJ, Smith SA. An observational study of how young people search for online sexual health information. J Am Coll Health. 2009;58(2):101–111. doi:10.1080/07448480903221236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman AR, Webb MC, Brinkley J, Martin RJ. Sexual behaviour and interest in using a sexual health mobile app to help improve and manage college students’ sexual health. Sex Educ. 2014;14(3):310–322. doi:10.1080/14681811.2014.889604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalke KM, Ginossar T, Shah SFA, West AJ. Sex Ed to go: A content analysis of comprehensive sexual education apps. Health Educ Behav. 2018;45(4):581–590. doi:10.1177/1090198117749259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn SL, Kaciroti N, Eisenberg D, Weeks HM, Bauer KW, Sonneville KR. Introducing dietary self-monitoring to undergraduate women via a calorie counting app has no effect on mental health or health behaviors: Results from a randomized controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021;121(12):2377–2388. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melcher J, Torous J. Smartphone apps for college mental health: A concern for privacy and quality of current offerings. Psychiatr Serv. 2020;71(11):1114–1119. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.202000098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver C, Kennedy R, Jones D. A mental health app: How a health promoting university improved access for students and employees. Educause; 2021. Accessed on April 20, 2021. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2021/4/a-mental-health-app-how-a-health-promoting-university-improved-access-for-students-and-employees
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar