The validation of smartphone applications for heart rate measurement

References

• Humphries KH, Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, et al. New-onset atrial fibrillation: sex differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome. Circulation. 2001;103:2365–2370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Akilov O, et al. Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:422–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante TB, Urrea B, MacFarlane ZT, et al. Validation of the instant blood pressure smartphone app. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:700–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami H, Kawakami R, Nakae S, et al. Accuracy of wearable devices for estimating total energy expenditure: comparison with metabolic chamber and doubly labeled water method. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:702–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechi R, Faes L, Bachmann LM, et al. Evidence assessing the diagnostic performance of medical smartphone apps: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e018280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke LE, Ma J, Azar KM, et al. Current science on consumer use of mobile health for cardiovascular disease prevention: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:1157–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eapen ZJ, Turakhia MP, McConnell MV, et al. Defining a mobile health roadmap for cardiovascular health and disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ridder B, Van Rompaey B, Kampen JK, et al. Smartphone apps using photoplethysmography for heart rate monitoring: meta-analysis [review]. JMIR Cardio. 2018;2:e4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fallow BA, Tarumi T, Tanaka H. Influence of skin type and wavelength on light wave reflectance. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27:313–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 2007;28:R1–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully CG, Lee J, Meyer J, et al. Physiological parameter monitoring from optical recordings with a mobile phone. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng. 2012;59:303–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberk T, Stans J, Van Schelvergem G, et al. Clinical validation of heart rate apps: mixed-methods evaluation study. JMIR mHealth Uhealth. 2017;5:e129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Thakor N. Photoplethysmography revisited: from contact to noncontact, from point to imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016;63:463–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneed NV, Hollerbach AD. Accuracy of heart rate assessment in atrial fibrillation. Heart Lung. 1992;21:427–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho CL, Fu YC, Lin MC, et al. Smartphone applications (apps) for heart rate measurement in children: comparison with electrocardiography monitor. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35:726–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackel P, Beerman L, West L, et al. Tachycardia detection using smartphone applications in pediatric patients. Jour Pediatr. 2014;164:1133–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc MD, Chong JW, Soni A, et al. PULSE-SMART: pulse-based arrhythmia discrimination using a novel smartphone application. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:51–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarakji KG, Wazni OM, Callahan T, et al. Using a novel wireless system for monitoring patients after the atrial fibrillation ablation procedure: the iTransmit study. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:554–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan PH, Wong CK, Poh YC, et al. Diagnostic performance of a smartphone-based photoplethysmographic application for atrial fibrillation screening in a primary care setting. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bumgarner JM, Lambert CT, Hussein AA, et al. Smartwatch algorithm for automated detection of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2381–2388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonios G, Bykowski J, Kollias N. Skin melanin, hemoglobin, and light scattering properties can be quantitatively assessed in vivo using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117:1452–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:869–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash C, Town G, Bjerring P, et al. Evaluation of a novel skin tone meter and the correlation between Fitzpatrick skin type and skin color. Photonics Lasers Med. 2015;4:177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Yan L, Hu S, Alzahrani A, et al. A multi-wavelength opto-electronic patch sensor to effectively detect physiological changes against human skin types. Biosensors. 2017;7:22.
   Google Scholar