From static web to metaverse: reinventing medical education in the post-pandemic era

References

• Flexner A. Medical education in the United Sates and Canada. Science. 1910;32(810):1–20. doi: 10.1126/science.32.810.41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailey M. The flexner report: standardizing medical students through region-, gender-, and Race-Based hierarchies. Am J Law Med. 2017;43(2–3):209–223. doi: 10.1177/0098858817723660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy TP. The flexner report–100 years later. Yale J Biol Med. 2011;84(3):269–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guze PA. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:260–270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee J, Kim H, Kim KH, et al. Effective virtual patient simulators for medical communication training: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2020;54(9):786–795. doi: 10.1111/medu.14152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees AF, Beni C, Lee A, et al. Uses of electronic health record data to measure the clinical learning environment of graduate medical education trainees: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2023;98(11):1326–1336. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövquist E. Simulation-based medical training: a user-centered design perspective. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis KO, Cidon MJ, Seto TL, et al. Leveraging e-learning in medical education. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2014;44(6):150–163. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2014.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salavitabar A, Popov V, Nelson J, et al. Extended reality international grand rounds: an innovative approach to medical education in the pandemic era. Acad Med. 2022;97(7):1017–1020. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel A, King B, Cervero RM. Medical school faculty perceptions of online education: implications for the future of medical education. Am J Distance Educ. 2023. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2023.2210492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maska E, Rosenberg EI, Verstegen D. 2019. Teaching in the electronic era: medical records and social media. In Rosenberg EI, Zaidi Z, Beyth RJ, editors. Contemporary challenges in medical education: from theory to practice (pp. 202–219. Florida: University Press of Florida. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvx06z7z.17.
   Google Scholar
• Rodman A, Trivedi S. Podcasting: a roadmap to the future of medical education. Semin Nephrol. 2020;40(3):279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2020.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajab MH, Gazal AM, Alkattan K. Challenges to online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus. 2020;13(2):e13536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis KO. E-learning: survival guide for medical educators. 2020. https://anatoliajournal.com/depo/Ek-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tacgin Z. Virtual and augmented reality: an educational handbook. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Tlili A, Huang R, Shehata B, et al. Is metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis. Smart Learn Environ. 2022;9(24):1–31. doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00205-x.
   Google Scholar
• Bonk CJ. The world is open: how web technology is revolutionizing education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sur RL, Dahm P. History of evidence-based medicine. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(4):487. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.91438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mbunge E, Jiyane S, Muchemwa B. Towards emotive sensory web in virtual health care: trends, technologies, challenges and ethical issues. Sens Int. 2022;3:100134. doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100134.
   Google Scholar
• Anwar AA. A survey of the semantic web (web 3.0), its applications, challenges, future and its relation with internet of things (IOT). WEB. 2022;20(3):173–202. doi: 10.3233/WEB-210491.
   Google Scholar
• Huk T, From education 1.0 to education 4.0 – challenges for the contemporary school. TNER. 2021;66(4):36–46. doi: 10.15804/tner.21.66.4.03.
   Google Scholar
• Javaid M, Khan IH. Internet of things (IOT) enabled healthcare helps to take the challenges of covid-19 pandemic. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021;11(2):209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.01.015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Srinidhi NN, Dilip Kumar SM, Venugopal KR. Network optimizations in the internet of things: a review. Eng Sci Technol. 2019;22(1):1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito-Osorio D, Peris-Ortiz M, Armengot CR, et al. Web 5.0: the future of emotional competences in higher education. Glob Bus Perspect. 2013;1(3):274–287. doi: 10.1007/s40196-013-0016-5.
   Google Scholar
• Nedeva V, Dineva S. Intelligent e-learning with new web technologies. IUP Journal of Computer Sciences. 2022;16(1):60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Neame R, Murphy B, Stitt F, et al. Universities without walls: evolving paradigms in medical education. BMJ. 1999;319(7220):1296–1296. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7220.1296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinal J. From education 1.0 to education 4.0.: teacher training models from the 19th century to the present day. Hist Educ Child Lit. 2021;16(2):555–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latinovic T. The meaning of the new era of industry 4.0, healthcare 4.0 and education 4.0 concerning the development of 5G networks, IOT and smart everything. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara. 2023;21(3):147–152.
   Google Scholar
• Chaka C. Is education 4.0 a sufficient innovative, and disruptive educational trend to promote sustainable open education for higher education institutions? A review of literature trends. Front Educ. 2022;7:824976. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.824976.
   Google Scholar
• David MFB, Davis MH, Harden RM, et al. AMEE medical education guide no. 24: portfolios as a method of student assessment. Med Teach. 2001;23(6):535–551. doi: 10.1080/01421590120090952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387–396. doi: 10.1056/nejmra054784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis KO, Hathaway S, Bratcher DF, et al. Current milestones assessment practices, needs, and challenges of program directors: a collective case study in a pediatric hospital setting. Cureus. 2021;13(4):e14585. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raee H, Amini M, Nasab AP, et al. Team-based assessment of professional behavior in medical students. DOAJ. 2014;2(3):126–130. https://doaj.org/article/6a5b87542e804e5094814c3ae4e66957
   Google Scholar
• Tabish S. Assessment methods in medical education. Int J Health Sci. 2008;2(2):3–7. http://students.uthscsa.edu/data/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2014/07/Assessment-Methods-in-Medical-Education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wright MC, Phillips-Bute B, Petrusa E, et al. Assessing teamwork in medical education and practice: relating behavioural teamwork ratings and clinical performance. Med Teach. 2009;31(1):30–38. doi: 10.1080/01421590802070853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan M, Mohan H, Ryan JR, et al. Virtual and augmented reality for biomedical applications. Cell Rep Med. 2021;2(7):100348. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curran V, Xu X, Aydin MY, et al. Use of extended reality in medical education: an integrative review. Med Sci Educ. 2022;33(1):275–286. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01698-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruiz Mejia JM, Rawat DB. 2022). Recent advances in a medical domain metaverse: status, challenges, and perspective. 2022 Thirteenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN). doi: 10.1109/ICUFN55119.2022.9829645.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict MD, Inniss DA, Kantor T, et al. 28. The role of XR technology in the field of plastic surgery training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;11(2S):17–18. doi: 10.1097/01.GOX.0000921660.31205.22.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. J. (2010). Theoretical bases for using virtual reality in education. Themes Sci Technol Educ, 2(1–2), 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ. Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychol Schools. 2008;45(5):369–386. doi: 10.1002/pits.20303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida F, Simoes J. The role of serious games, gamification and industry 4.0 tools in the education 4.0 paradigm. Cont ED Technology. 2019;10(2):120–136. doi: 10.30935/cet.554469.
   Google Scholar
• Rochlen LR, Putnam EM, Tait AR, et al. Sequential behavioral analysis: a novel approach to help understand clinical decision-making patterns in extended reality simulated scenarios. Simul Healthc. 2022;18:10–1097.
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan AP, Inniss DA, Benedict MD, et al. International mixed reality immersive experience: approach via surgical grand rounds. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;234(1):25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.09.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh I, McKinney T, Siu K-C. Current perspective of metaverse application in medical education, research and patient care. Virtual Worlds. 2023;2(2):115–128. doi: 10.3390/virtualworlds2020007.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington RA, Califf RM, Balamurugan A, et al. Call to action: rural health: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Circulation. 2020;141(10):e615–e644. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. Virtual reality (VR) headset unit sales worldwide from 2019 to 2024. 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/677096/vr-headsets-worldwide/?locale=en.
   Google Scholar
• Chan KS, Zary N. Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(1):e13930. doi: 10.2196/13930.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antón-Sancho Á, Fernández-Arias P, Vergara D. Virtual reality in health science education: professors’ perceptions. MTI. 2022;6(12):110. doi: 10.3390/mti6120110.
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi YK, Hughes L, Baabdullah AM, et al. Metaverse beyond the hype: multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int J Inf Manage. 2022;66:102542. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielsa VF. Virtual reality simulation in plastic surgery training. Literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(9):2372–2378. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy DJ, Coe TM, Jogerst KM, et al. Transfer of virtual reality endoscopy training to live animal colonoscopy: a randomized control trial of proficiency vs. repetition-based training. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(9):6767–6776. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08958-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Lin W, Zheng Y, et al. Application of active learning strategies in metaverse to improve student engagement: an immersive blended pedagogy bridging patient care and scientific inquiry in pandemic. Available at SSRN 4098179. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Fahl JT, Duvivier R, Reinke L, et al. Towards best practice in developing motor skills: a systematic review on spacing in VR simulator-based psychomotor training for surgical novices. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04046-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiani B, De Stefano F, Kondilis A, et al. Virtual reality in neurosurgery:“can you see it?”–a review of the current applications and future potential. World Neurosurg. 2020;141:291–298. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh GS, Lohre R, Parvizi J, et al. Virtual and augmented reality for surgical training and simulation in knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(12):2303–2312. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04037-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanese N. New neuroanatomy lab bridges virtual reality, operating room. News Center. 2018, March 8. https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2018/03/new-neuroanatomy-lab-bridges-virtual-reality-operating-room.html.
   Google Scholar
• Precision OS. 2022. Orthopedic residency program and PrecisionOS team up for exclusive 3-year collaboration: virtual reality development and curriculum integration. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/orthopedic-residency-program-and-precisionos-team-up-for-exclusive-3-year-collaboration-virtual-reality-development-and-curriculum-integration-301652907.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stull AT, Hegarty M, Mayer RE. Getting a handle on learning anatomy with interactive three-dimensional graphics. J Educ Psychol. 2009;101(4):803–816. doi: 10.1037/a0016849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez DG, Aparicio F, De Buenaga M, et al. Personalized health care system with virtual reality rehabilitation and appropriate information for seniors. Sensors. 2012;12(5):5502–5516. doi: 10.3390/s120505502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaednia H, Fourman MS, Lans A, et al. Augmented and virtual reality in spine surgery, current applications and future potentials. Spine J. 2021;21(10):1617–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godzik J, Farber SH, Urakov T, et al. “Disruptive technology” in spine surgery and education: virtual and augmented reality. Oper Neurosurg. 2021;21(Suppl 1):S85–S93. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab114.
   Google Scholar
• Velazco‐Garcia JD, Navkar NV, Balakrishnan S, et al. Evaluation of how users interface with holographic augmented reality surgical scenes: interactive planning MR‐guided prostate biopsies. Int J Med Robot. 2021;17(5):e2290. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esperto F, Prata F, Autrán-Gómez AM, et al. New technologies for kidney surgery planning 3D, impression, augmented reality 3D, reconstruction: current realities and expectations. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22(7):35. doi: 10.1007/s11934-021-01052-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagayo Y, Saito T, Oyama H. A novel suture training system for open surgery replicating procedures performed by experts using augmented reality. J Med Syst. 2021;45(5):60. doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01735-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis G, Yilmaz M, Rambach J, et al. Mixed reality applications in urology: requirements and future potential. Ann Med Surg. 2021;66:102394. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf J, Wolfer V, Halbe M, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of augmented reality-based and conventional instructions during single ECMO cannulation training. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021;16(7):1171–1180. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02408-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpham-Lockyer L, Laskaratos F-M, Berlingieri P, et al. Role of virtual reality simulation in endoscopy training. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7(18):1287–1294. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i18.1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janse JA, Veersema S, Broekmans FJ, et al. A virtual reality simulator for hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization micro-inserts: the face and construct validity. Gynecol Surg. 2013;10(3):181–188. doi: 10.1007/s10397-013-0790-8.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein G, Zukotynski B, Cevallos N, et al. Randomized trial of a virtual reality tool to teach surgical technique for tibial shaft fracture intramedullary nailing. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(4):969–977. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NYU Langone Health. The education revolution: NYU Langone Health. 2023, November 13. https://give.nyulangone.org/stories/driving-the-education-revolution
   Google Scholar
• Lindner P, Miloff A, Hamilton W, et al. Creating state of the art, next-generation virtual reality exposure therapies for anxiety disorders using consumer hardware platforms: design considerations and future directions. Cogn Behav Ther. 2017;46(5):404–420. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1280843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho S, Ku J, Cho YK, et al. Development of virtual reality proprioceptive rehabilitation system for stroke patients. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):258–265. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Jang SH, Kim CS, et al. Use of virtual reality to enhance balance and ambulation in chronic stroke: a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(9):693–701. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b33350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloréns R, Noé E, Colomer C, et al. Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality–based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):418–425.e2. e412. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem Y, Gropack SJ, Coffin D, et al. Effectiveness of a low-cost virtual reality system for children with developmental delay: a preliminary randomised single-blind controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(3):189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turolla A, Dam M, Ventura L, et al. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of the upper limb motor function after stroke: a prospective controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10(1):85. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gandolfi M, Geroin C, Dimitrova E, et al. Virtual reality telerehabilitation for postural instability in Parkinson’s disease: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7962826–7962811. doi: 10.1155/2017/7962826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han S, Park C, You JH. Effects of robotic interactive gait training combined with virtual reality and augmented reality on balance, gross motor function, gait kinetic, and kinematic characteristics in angelman syndrome: a case report. Children. 2022;9(4):544. doi: 10.3390/children9040544.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boulos MNK, Hetherington L, Wheeler S. Second life: an overview of the potential of 3‐D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Info Libr J. 2007;24(4):233–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00733.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields DA, Kafai YB, Giang MT, et al. Plagues and people: engineering player participation and prevention in a virtual epidemic. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 12th international conference on the foundations of digital games. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja AS, Polascik BW, Doddapaneni D, et al. The digital metaverse: applications in artificial intelligence, medical education, and integrative health. Integr Med Res. 2023;12(1):100917. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2022.100917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaran NK, Nisar HJ, Zhang J, et al. Efficacy study on interactive mixed reality (IMR) software with sepsis prevention medical education. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) IEEE Annual International Symposium Virtual Reality. 2019. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8798089. doi: 10.1109/VR.2019.8798089.
   Google Scholar
• Skalidis I, Muller O, Fournier S. CardioVerse: the cardiovascular medicine in the era of metaverse. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2022;33(8):471–476. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050173822000718. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2022.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern DE. Curriculum development for medical education: a six step approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Mantilla G, Lewis KO. Determining faculty and student readiness for an online medical curriculum. MedSciEduc. 2012;22(4):228–243. doi: 10.1007/BF03341791.
   Google Scholar