The psychosocial impact of eye-gaze assistive technology on everyday life of children and adults

References

• Bouck EC, Flanagan S. Technological advances in special education. Special Education International Perspectives: biopsychosocial, cultural, and disability aspects. 2014;27:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Majaranta P. Gaze interaction and applications of eye tracking: advances in assistive technologies: advances in assistive technologies. : IGI Global; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Al Khatib I, Masayko S, et al. The impact of eye-gaze controlled computer on communication and functional independence in children and young people with complex needs–a multicenter intervention study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2021;24(8):1–12. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2021.1903603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Ahlsten G, et al. Gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities in children with severe physical impairments–an intervention study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(3):129–141. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2015.1132281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Ahlsten G, Wandin H, et al. Eye-gaze control technology as early intervention for a non-verbal young child with high spinal cord injury: a case report. Technologies. 2018;6(1):12. doi: 10.3390/technologies6010012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Borgestig M. Usability of eye-gaze controlled computers in Sweden: a total population survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1639. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caligari M, Godi M, Guglielmetti S, et al. Eye tracking communication devices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: impact on disability and quality of life. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2013;14(7-8):546–552. doi: 10.3109/21678421.2013.803576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spataro R, Ciriacono M, Manno C, et al. The eye‐tracking computer device for communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;130(1):40–45. doi: 10.1111/ane.12214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh Y-H, Borgestig M, Gopalarao D, et al. Communicative interaction with and without eye-gaze technology between children and youths with complex needs and their communication partners. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5134. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang C-S, Weng H-H, Wang L-F, et al. An eye-tracking assistive device improves the quality of life for ALS patients and reduces the caregivers’ burden. J Mot Behav. 2014;46(4):233–238. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2014.891970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Rytterström P, Hemmingsson H. Gaze-based assistive technology used in daily life by children with severe physical impairments–parents’ experiences. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(5):301–308. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2016.1211769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos ADP, Ferrari ALM, Medola FO, et al. Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;17(2):152–158. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K. Why do older people love and hate assistive technology?–an emotional experience perspective. Ergonomics. 2020;63(12):1463–1474. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1808714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polgar JM. 2011). The myth of neutral technology. In Design and use of assistive technology. (pp. 17–23). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baric V, Andreassen M, Öhman A, et al. Using an interactive digital calendar with mobile phone reminders by senior people-a focus group study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1128-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedersen H, Söderström S, Kermit PS. “The fact that i can be in front of others, I am used to being a bit behind”: how assistive activity technology affects participation in everyday life. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(1):83–91. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1642391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J, Campbell K. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1-3):31–37. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Ranada Å, Lidström H. Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process—a systematic review. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):82–97. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1367737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt R, Chau B, Jutai JW. The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis. Occup Ther Health Care. 2004;17(3-4):63–79. doi: 10.1080/J003v17n03_05.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiménez-Arberas E, Díez E. Psychosocial impact of assistive devices and other technologies on deaf and hard of hearing people. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(14):7259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson P, Griffiths T, Clarke MT, et al. Stakeholder consensus for decision making in eye-gaze control technology for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy service provision: findings from a delphi study. BMC Neurol. 2021;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02077-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytterström P, Borgestig M, Hemmingsson H. Teachers’ experiences of using eye gaze-controlled computers for pupils with severe motor impairments and without speech. European J Spec Needs Educ. 2016;31(4):506–519. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2016.1187878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics.: Sage; Los Angeles 2013
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson L. Hälso- Och Sjukvårdslagen: Med Kommentarer (Health and Helalth Care Law: with Comments). Stockholm, Sweden: Wolters Kluwer; 2017
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. TAD. 2002;14(3):101–105. doi: 10.3233/TAD-2002-14304.
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). TAD. 2002;14(3):107–111. doi: 10.3233/TAD-2002-14305.
   Google Scholar
• Vessoyan K, Steckle G, Easton B, et al. Using eye-tracking technology for communication in rett syndrome: perceptions of impact. Augment Altern Commun. 2018;34(3):230–241. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1462848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandin H, Lindberg P, Sonnander K. Aided language modelling, responsive communication and eye-gaze technology as communication intervention for adults with rett syndrome: three experimental single case studies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;18(7):1011–1025. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1967469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekteshi S, Karlsson P, De Reyck L, et al. Eye movements and stress during eye‐tracking gaming performance in children with dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(11):1402–1415. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Parsons R, et al. Eye gaze performance for children with severe physical impairments using gaze-based assistive technology—a longitudinal study. Assist Technol. 2016;28(2):93–102. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2015.1092182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Tetzchner
   Google Scholar
• Imms C. Children with cerebral palsy participate: a review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(24):1867–1884. doi: 10.1080/09638280701673542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei C, Reilly S, Reddihough D, et al. Activities and participation of children with cerebral palsy: parent perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2164–2173. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.999164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirumanickam A, Raghavendra P, Olsson C. Participation and social networks of school-age children with complex communication needs: a descriptive study. Augment Altern Commun. 2011;27(3):195–204. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2011.610818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd V, Gatherer A, Kalsy S. Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(10):1386–1404. doi: 10.1177/1049732306293846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polgar JM.. The myth of neutral technology. In Design and use of assistive technology: social, technical, ethical, and economic challenges. (pp. 17–23). New York: Springer: 2010
   Google Scholar