Campaigning in the dark: theorising campaign strategies from the 2022 Seanad by-election

References

• Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts – How green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123414000155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Chadi, T., Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2020). Parties’ policy adjustments in response to changes in issue saliency. West European Politics, 43(4), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1609296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., & Glasgow, G. (2006). Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976-1998. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, J. H. (2011). Why parties? A second look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anstead, N. (2017). Data-driven campaigning in the 2015 United Kingdom general election. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217706163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, É., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, R., & Freeder, S. (2020). The more you know: Voter heuristics and the information search. Political Behavior, 42(2), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9512-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R. E. (2011). The declining electoral relevance of traditional cleavage groups. European Political Science Review, 3(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1980). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2013). Reforming political institutions: Ireland in comparative perspective. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2014). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (6th ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, S., & Conover, P. J. (1983). Candidates, issues and voters: The role of inference in political perception. The Journal of Politics, 45, 810–839. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J., & Seawright, J. (2007). Techniques for choosing cases. In J. Gerring (Ed.), Case study research: Principles and practices (pp. 86–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., & Hobolt, S. B. (2008). Owning the issue agenda: Party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 460–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C. (2007). The growing importance of issue competition: The changing nature of party competition in Western Europe. Political Studies, 55(3), 607–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., & Little, C. (2023). Understanding the conflict of conflicts: Is left-right conflict a necessary condition for the development of new politics? Political Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221141424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurian, P.-H. (1993). Candidate behavior in presidential nomination campaigns: A dynamic model. The Journal of Politics, 55(1), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K. J. (2022). Who refuses ambiguity? Voters’ issue salience and the electoral effect of party position ambiguity. Comparative European Politics, 20(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00263-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, T. K., Pattie, C., & Johnston, R. (2017). Learning on the job? Adapting party campaign strategy to changing information on the local political context. Electoral Studies, 49, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, E. D. (2015). Hacking the electorate. How campaigns perceive voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., & Wittrock, J. (2011). The second-order election model revisited: An experimental test of vote choices in European parliament elections. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda, K., Harmel, R., Edens, C., & Goff, P. (1995). Changes in party identity: Evidence from party manifestos. Party Politics, 1(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, R., & Shephard, M. (2007). Gender, candidate image and electoral preference. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(3), 434–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00263.x
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C. D. (2005). Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior, 27, 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-1764-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölln, A.-K. (2015). The value of political parties to representative democracy. European Political Science Review, 7(4), 593–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M. (2005). Policy and the dynamics of political competition. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeill, H. (2022, February 27). Facebook post. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/hugo.macneill
   Google Scholar
• MacNeill, H. (2022, March 23). Instagram post. Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/macneillhugo/
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of Western democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. E., Shanks, J. M., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1996). The new American voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. C. (2016). The Seanad election: Second chamber, second chance. In M. Gallagher, & M. Marsh (Eds.), How Ireland voted 2016: The election that nobody won (pp. 227–253). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Neundorf, A., & Adams, J. (2018). The micro-foundations of party competition and issue ownership: The reciprocal effects of citizens’ issue salience and party attachments. British Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, D. W., & Rogers, T. (2014). Political campaigns and big data. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Lovenduski, J. (2004). Why parties fail to learn. Party Politics, 10(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804039122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oluborode, A. (2022, February 28). Facebook post. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/AdeforSeanad
   Google Scholar
• Oluborode, A. (2022, March 29). Facebook post. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/AdeforSeanad
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. M. (2020). Responsive campaigning: Evidence from European parties. The Journal of Politics, 82(4), 1183–1195. https://doi.org/10.1086/707827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidy, T. (2008). The Seanad election. In M. Gallagher, & M. Marsh (Eds.), How Ireland voted 2007: The full story of Ireland’s general election (pp. 187–204). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections – A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseingrave, P. (2022, March 21). Facebook post. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/PaulaRoseingrave
   Google Scholar
• Seeberg, H. B. (2022). First avoidance, then engagement: Political parties’ issue competition in the electoral cycle. Party Politics, 28(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820970353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Timely decisions: The effects of past national elections on party policy change. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 632–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinity College Dublin. (2022). Seanad by-election 2022. Retrieved from https://www.tcd.ie/seanad/faq/
   Google Scholar
• van der Brug, W. (2004). Issue ownership and party choice. Electoral Studies, 23(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00061-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, T. W. G., van Elsas, E., Lubbe, R., & van der Brug, W. (2015). Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006-2010). Party Politics, 21(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2014). Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics, 37(5), 1019–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.911483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, L. (2017). Independents in Irish party democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar