Conceptualizing patient-reported outcome measures for use within two Danish psychiatric clinical registries: description of an iterative co-creation process between patients and healthcare professionals

References

• Videbech P, Deleuran A. The Danish Depression Database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:475–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baandrup L, Cerqueira C, Haller L, et al. The Danish Schizophrenia Registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:691–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. In: Griffith JR, editor. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Ann Arbor Michigan: Health Administration Press; 1980. p. 4–163.
   Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The criteria and standards of quality. In explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? 1988. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:1145–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009; Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. [cited 2017 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. U S Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) 2009 Dec;1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bech P, Timmerby N. An overview of which health domains to consider and when to apply them in measurement-based care for depression and anxiety disorders. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;1;1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Larsson S, Lee TH. Standardizing patient outcomes measurement. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:504–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckett T, Butow PN, King MT. Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions. Psychooncology. 2009;18:1129–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ. A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etkind SN, Daveson BA, Kwok W, et al. Capture, transfer, and feedback of patient-centered outcomes data in palliative care populations: does it make a difference? A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;49:611–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1846–1858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basch E, Spertus J, Dudley RA, et al. Methods for developing patient-reported outcome-based performance measures (PRO-PMs). Value Health. 2015;18:493–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD Health Ministers. The next generation of health reforms: ministerial statement. [cited 2018 Feb 14]. Available from www.oecd.org/health/ministerial/ministerial-statement-2017.pdf. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2017;1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter A. Measuring what matters to patients. BMJ. 2017;356:j816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slawomirski L. Use of PROM in OECD member states. (Personal communication) 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Forde I, Slawomirski L. Collecting patient-reported indicators of health system performance. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Paris: OECD Publishing, Paris; 2016. Report No.: DELSA/HEA(2016)21.
   Google Scholar
• Roe D, Werbeloff N, Gelkopf M. Do persons with severe mental illness who consume the psychiatric rehabilitation basket of services in Israel have better outcomes than those who do not? Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2010;47:166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe D, Gelkopf M, Gornemann MI, et al. Implementing routine outcome measurement in psychiatric rehabilitation services in Israel. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27:345–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe D, Lapid L, Baloush-Kleinman V, et al. Using routine outcome measures to provide feedback at the service agency level. Community Ment Health J. 2016;52:1022–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorflinger LH, Knudsen JL. An introduction to patient reported outcome measures in quality assessment]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2015;177. pii: V07140381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blunch NJ. Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling Using SPSS and Amos. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• About the Danish Clinical Registries. [cited 2018 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.rkkp.dk/in-english/. Regionernes Klinike Kvalitetsudviklingsprogram 2018;1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrozsi S, Panepinto J. Child and parent preferences for graphical display of patient-reported outcome data. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64:e26499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp CW, Ostergaard SD, Sondergaard S, et al. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84:167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). [cited 2018 Feb 26]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/whodasii/en/. World Health Organization 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:461–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra D, Qureshi A, Henley W, et al. The work and social adjustment scale: reliability, sensitivity and value. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2014;18:131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36). [cited 2018 Feb 26]. Available from: https://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/survey-instrument.html. Rand Health 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bech P, Austin SF, Lau ME. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): examination of the psychometric properties of two measures for burden of symptoms and quality of life in patients with depression or anxiety. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72:251–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech P. Measurement based care in mental disorders. Brief in psychology. Charm. Switzerland; Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorner JB, Wallenstein GV, Martin MC, et al. Interpreting score differences in the SF-36 Vitality scale: using clinical conditions and functional outcomes to define the minimally important difference. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorner JB, Kreiner S, Ware JE, et al. Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1189–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorner JB, Damsgaard MT, Watt T, et al. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1001–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorner JB, Thunedborg K, Kristensen TS, et al. The Danish SF-36 Health Survey: translation and preliminary validity studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:991–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter T, Schaefer FA, Scherer M, et al. Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:259–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiering B, de BD, Delnoij D. Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: the developers' perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Wees PJ, Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden MW, Ayanian JZ, et al. Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries. Milbank Q. 2014;92:754–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krageloh CU, Czuba KJ, Billington DR, et al. Using feedback from patient-reported outcome measures in mental health services: a scoping study and typology. PS. 2015;66:224–241.
   Google Scholar