Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale second edition (RADS-2) in a clinical sample

References

• Lepine JP, Briley M. The increasing burden of depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7(1):3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. World health organization: depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Avenevoli S, Swendsen J, He JP, et al. Major depression in the national comorbidity survey-adolescent supplement: prevalence, correlates, and treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54(1):37–44.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson D, Dupuis G, Piche J, et al. Adult mental health outcomes of adolescent depression: a systematic review. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(8):700–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone M, Kuja-Halkola R, Leval A, et al. Association of youth depression with subsequent somatic diseases and premature death. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(3):302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Henje Blom E, Ho TC, Connolly CG, et al. The neuroscience and context of adolescent depression. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105(4):358–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(21):8174–8179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekbäck E, Granåsen G, Svärling R, et al. Clinical effectiveness of training for awareness resilience and action online compared to standard treatment for adolescents and young adults with depression: study protocol and analysis plan for a pragmatic, multi-center randomized controlled superiority trial. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:674583–674583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds WM. Reynolds adolescent depression scale. 2nd ed. Professional manual. Odessa (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca-Pedrero E, Wells C, Paino M, et al. Measurement invariance of the Reynolds depression adolescent scale across gender and age. Int J Test. 2010;10(2):133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Henje Blom E, Tymofiyeva O, Chesney MA, et al. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a novel RDoC-based treatment program for adolescent depression: “training for awareness resilience and action” (TARA)-a pilot study. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun MS, Nam KA, Kang HS, et al. Reynolds adolescent depression scale - second edition: initial validation of the Korean version. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(3):642–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King CA, O’Mara RM, Hayward CN, et al. Adolescent suicide risk screening in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(11):1234–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockings E, Degenhardt L, Lee YY, et al. Symptom screening scales for detecting major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic utility. J Affect Disord. 2015;174:447–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker L, Merry S, Watson PD, et al. The Reynolds adolescent depression scale in New Zealand adolescents. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(3):136–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman A, Gutierrez PM, Bagge CL, et al. Reynolds adolescent depression scale-second edition: a reliable and useful instrument. J Clin Psychol. 2010;66(12):1324–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sami S, Ahmad R, Khanam SJ. Translation of Reynolds adolescent depression scale - second edition in Pakistan: reliability estimates and factor analysis. Pak J Clin Psychol. 2013;12(2):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Carillo A. Creation and use of the RADS-2TM and the RCDSTM-2:SF: Spanish translations (white paper). PAR-Inc. Lutz, Florida. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist I, Ekbäck E, Dennhag I, et al. Validation of the Swedish version of the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale second edition (RADS-2) in a normative sample. Nord J Psychiatry. 2020;75:292–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck JS, Beck AT, Jolly J. Manual for the beck youth inventories of emotional and social impairment. San Antonio (TX): The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bose-Deakins JE, Floyd RG. A review of the beck youth inventories of emotional and social impairment. J School Psychol. 2004;42(4):333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer RA, Kumar G, Beck JS, et al. Evidence for the construct validities of the Beck Youth Inventories with child psychiatric outpatients. Psychol Rep. 2001;89(3):559–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunerfeldt ME, Söderström A. Bengt. Bedömningsinstrument inom BUP i Stockholm. Kartläggning och faktasammanställning. Stockholm: Barn- och ungdomspsykiatri, Stockholms läns landsting; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• SBU. Diagnostik och uppföljning av förstämningssyndrom. En systematisk litteraturöversikt. SBU-rapport nr 212. Stockholm: SBU, Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody TJ, Rush AJ, Bernstein I, et al. The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: a comparison of measures. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;16(8):601–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JB, Kobak KA. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA). Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192(1):52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntini I, Vadlin S, Olofsdotter S, et al. The Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale - self-assessment for use in adolescents: an evaluation of psychometric and diagnostic accuracy. Nord J Psychiatry. 2020;74(6):415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorpita BF, Yim L, Moffitt C, et al. Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behav Res Ther. 2000;38(8):835–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piqueras JA, Martín-Vivar M, Sandin B, et al. The revised child anxiety and depression scale: a systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2017;218:153–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannopoulou I, Pasalari E, Bali P, et al. Psychometric properties of the revised child anxiety and depression scale in Greek adolescents. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022;27(2):424–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kösters MP, Chinapaw MJ, Zwaanswijk M, et al. Structure, reliability, and validity of the revised child anxiety and depression scale (RCADS) in a multi-ethnic urban sample of Dutch children. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert M, Cheng H, Deighton J. Measurement issues: review of four patient reported outcome measures: SDQ, RCADS, C/ORS and GBO - their strengths and limitations for clinical use and service evaluation. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2015;20(1):63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patient-reported outcomes in performance measurement. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA: RTI Press/RTI international. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• PROMIS-Organization. PROMIS pediatric banks item definitions. Unpublished work. 2018. Available from: www.promishealth.org
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist I, Chaplin JE, Nilsson E, et al. Swedish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of eight pediatric item banks from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)(®). J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021;5(1):80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlberg Rindestig F, Wiberg M, Chaplin JE, et al. Psychometrics of three Swedish physical pediatric item banks from the Patient-Reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)®: pain interference, fatigue, and physical activity. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021;5(1):105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alavi M, Visentin DC, Thapa DK, et al. Chi‐square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(9):2209–2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Business Res Methods. 2008;6(1):53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CH. The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychol Methods. 2016;21(3):369–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res. 2016;48(3):936–949.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014;105(3):399–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunally J, Bernstein IH. Psyhometric theory. 3rd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wu H, Estabrook R. Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika. 2016;81(4):1014–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svetina D, Rutkowski L, Rutkowski D. Multiple-Group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: an illustration using mplus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Struct Eq Model. 2020;27(1):111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra A, Bentler PM. Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika. 2010;75(2):243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988. p. 567.
   Google Scholar
• R-team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Yves R. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCB. Statistics Sweden (SCB) the Swedish socio-economic classification (SEI). 1984. Available from: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/22544e89c6f34ce7ac2e6fefbda407ef/english_ov9999_1982a01_br_x11op8204-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCB. Statistics Sweden (SCB) SEI, yrkesförteckning version 2020-04-16. 2020. Available from: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/22544e89c6f34ce7ac2e6fefbda407ef/sei_index_webb_20200416.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shi D, Maydeu-Olivares A, Rosseel Y. Assessing fit in ordinal factor analysis models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Struct Eq Model. 2020;27(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Utvecklingen av psykisk ohälsa bland barn och unga vuxna: Till och med 2016. 2017. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/statistik/2017-12-29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McMahon EM, Corcoran P, O’Regan G, et al. Physical activity in European adolescents and associations with anxiety, depression and well-being. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;26(1):111–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter T, Morres ID, Meade O, et al. The effect of exercise on depressive symptoms in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55(7):580–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto AJ, Roschel H, Benatti FB, et al. Poor agreement of objectively measured and self-reported physical activity in juvenile dermatomyositis and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(6):1507–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis RG, Olds T, Plotnikoff R, et al. Validity and bias on the online active Australia survey: activity level and participant factors associated with self-report bias. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh IC, Chan SWY, MacBeth A. Self-compassion and psychological distress in adolescents-a meta-analysis. Mindfulness (NY). 2018;9(4):1011–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henje E, Rindestig FC, Gilbert P, et al. Psychometric validity of the compassionate engagement and action scale for adolescents: a Swedish version. Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2020;8:70–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomqvist I, Henje Blom E, Hagglof B, et al. Increase of internalized mental health symptoms among adolescents during the last three decades. Eur J Public Health. 2019;29:925–931.
   Google Scholar
• Theresa K. Classical test theory: assumptions. In: Equations, limitations, and item analyses. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc; 2005. p. 91.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas ML. Advances in applications of item response theory to clinical assessment. Psychol Assess. 2019;31(12):1442–1455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapar A, Collishaw S, Pine DS, et al. Depression in adolescence. Lancet. 2012;379(9820):1056–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar