680
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

A critical examination of Danish norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

, , &
Pages 818-823 | Received 29 Aug 2022, Accepted 17 Aug 2023, Published online: 30 Aug 2023

References

  • Solmi M, Radua J, Olivola M, et al. Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry 2021;27(1):281–295.
  • Sheldrick RC, Merchant S, Perrin EC. Identification of Developmental-Behavioral problems in primary care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2011;128(2):356–363. doi:10.1542/peds.2010–3261.
  • Lykke K, Graungaard AH, Ertmann R, et al. The danish preventive child health examination should expand on mental health and the well-being of the family. Dan Med J. 2015;62(5):A5060.
  • Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Screening programmes: a short guide Increase effectiveness, maximize benefits and minimize harm. DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. 2020.
  • Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(11):1337–1345. doi:10.1097/00004583–200111000–00015.
  • Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;7(3):125–130. doi:10.1007/s007870050057.
  • Niclasen J, Teasdale TW, Andersen A-MN, et al. Psychometric properties of the danish strength and difficulties questionnaire: the SDQ assessed for more than 70,000 raters in four different cohorts. Scott JG, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e32025.
  • Baviskar S, Diop-Christensen A, Ebsen FC, et al. Structural validity and reliability of the danish self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire among male and female students in vocational education and training. J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020;32(2–3):87–98. doi:10.2989/17280583.2020.1830780.
  • Arnfred J, Svendsen K, Rask C, et al. Danish norms for the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Dan Med J. 2019;66(6):A5546.
  • Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, et al. The danish national birth cohort–its background, structure and aim. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29(4):300–307. doi:10.1177/14034948010290040201.
  • Olsen EM, Rask CU, Elberling H, et al. Cohort profile: the copenhagen child cohort study (CCC2000). Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(2):370–371l. doi:10.1093/ije/dyz256.
  • Ottosen MH. Research on the danish longitudinal survey of children (DALSC) at the danish national Centre for social research. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):121–125. doi:10.1177/1403494811399165.
  • Mortensen LM, Bech BH, Nohr EA, et al. Data resource profile: the aarhus birth cohort biobank (ABC biobank). Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(6):1697–1701. doi:10.1093/ije/dyt199.
  • Andersen SC. Private schools and the parents that choose them: empirical evidence from the danish school voucher system. Scand Pol Studs. 2008;31(1):44–68. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9477.2008.00195.x.
  • Schindler Rangvid B. Private school diversity in denmark’s national voucher system. Scand J Educ Res. 2008;52(4):331–354. doi:10.1080/00313830802184491.
  • Loft L, Waldfogel J. Socioeconomic status gradients in young children’s well-being at school. Child Dev. 2021;92(1):e91–e105.
  • Jacobsen TN, Nohr EA, Frydenberg M. Selection by socioeconomic factors into the danish national birth cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(5):349–355. doi:10.1007/s10654–010–9448–2.
  • Bliddal M, Liew Z, Pottegård A, et al. Examining nonparticipation in the maternal follow-up within the danish national birth cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(7):1511–1519. doi:10.1093/aje/kwy002.
  • Nohr EA, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, et al. Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias? Epidemiology. 2006;17(4):413–418. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000220549.14177.60.
  • Hjern A, Urhoj SK, Fransson E, et al. Mental health in schoolchildren in joint physical custody: a longitudinal study. Children. 2021;8(6):473. doi:10.3390/children8060473.
  • Dahl KM, Skov Kloppenborg H, Mau Pedersen NJ, et al. Kortlægning af plejefamilieområdet i grønland [internet]. VIVE – Viden Til Velfærd Det Nationale Forsknings- og Analysecenter for Velfærd. 2021.
  • Vugteveen J, de Bildt A, Timmerman ME. Normative data for the self-reported and parent-reported strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) for ages 12–17. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022;16(1):5. doi:10.1186/s13034–021–00437–8.
  • Borg A-M, Kaukonen P, Joukamaa M, et al. Finnish norms for young children on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Nord J Psychiatry. 2014;68(7):433–442. doi:10.3109/08039488.2013.853833.
  • Smedje H, Broman J-E, Hetta J, et al. Psychometric properties of a swedish version of the “strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;8(2):63–70. doi:10.1007/s007870050086.
  • BørnUngeLiv.dk. [Internet]. Institut for Folkesundhed på Aarhus Universitet. www.boernungeliv.dk
  • Lindholdt L, Lund T, Andersen JH, et al. Cohort profile: the danish future occupation of children and adolescents cohort (the FOCA cohort): education, work-life, health and living conditions in a life-course perspective. BMJ Open. 2019;9(2):e022784. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018–022784.
  • RegionMidtjylland. Mere om VestLiv [Internet]. https://www.arbejdsmedicin.rm.dk/forskning/ulighed-i-sundhed/vestliv/mere-om-vestliv/