Remaking Home: Creative Practice as Part of Domesticity’s Changing Significance

References

• Abidin, Crystal. 2014. “# In $ TagLam: Instagram as a Repository of Taste, a Burgeoning Marketplace, a war of Eyeballs.” In Mobile Media Making in an age of Smartphones, edited by M. Berry and M. Schleser, 119–128. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Adkins, Lisa. 2005. “The New Economy, Property and Personhood.” Theory, Culture & Society 22 (1): 111–130. doi:10.1177/0263276405048437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahl, Helene, and Susan Marlow. 2012. “Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: advancing debate to escape a dead end.” Organization 19 (5): 543–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, Alberto, and Paola Giuliano. 2010. “The Power of the Family.” Journal of Economic Growth (Boston, Mass.) 15 (2): 93–125. doi:10.1007/s10887-010-9052-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley, Ruth Ann, David L Strayer, and Paul Atchley. 2012. “Creativity in the Wild: Improving Creative Reasoning Through Immersion in Natural Settings.” PloS one 7 (12): 1–3. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, Michele. 1988. Women's Oppression Today: The Marxist/Feminist Encounter. Rev. ed. ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, Craig, and Marsha Berry. 2015. “Constellations and Connections: The Playful Space of the Creative Practice Research Degree.” Journal of Media Practice 16 (3): 181–194. doi:10.1080/14682753.2015.1116753.
   Google Scholar
• Beauvoir, Simone de, H M Parshley. 1972. The second sex. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Best, Beverley. 2021. “Wages for Housework Redux: Social Reproduction and the Utopian Dialectic of the Value-Form.” Theory & Event 24 (4): 896–921. doi:10.1353/tae.2021.0052.
   Google Scholar
• Borer, Michael Ian, and Andrea Fontana. 2012. “Postmodern Trends: Expanding the Horizons of Interviewing Practices and Epistemologies.” In The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, edited by James A. Holstein, Jaber F. Gubrium, Amir Marvasti, and Karyn D. McKinney, 45–60. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bratich, Jack Z., and Heidi M. Brush. 2011. “Fabricating Activism: Craft-Work, Popular Culture, Gender.” Utopian Studies 22 (2): 233–260. doi:10.5325/utopianstudies.22.2.0233.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, Ian. 2008. Social Selves: Theories of Self and Society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, Antoinette. 2019. “Toward Unsettling Histories of Domesticity.” The American Historical Review 124 (4): 1332–1336. doi:10.1093/ahr/rhz643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calfas, Jennifer. 2018. “The New Mommy Blogger: Instagram Famous, Highly Paid, and Sponsored by Minute Maid.” Money 11.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, Sara, Marian Baird, and Susie Elliott. 2014. “Intersections of Regulation, Space and Gender: Retail Banking in an Australian Regional Town.” Community, Work & Family 17 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/13668803.2013.862213.
   Google Scholar
• Conor, Bridget, Rosalind Gill, and Stephanie Taylor. 2015. “Gender and Creative Labour.” The Sociological Review (Keele) 63 (S1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. 1989. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. London: Free Association.
   Google Scholar
• d’Arcy, Conor, and Laura Gardiner. 2014. “Just the job–or a Working Compromise.” In The Changing Nature of Self-Employment in the UK. London: Resolution Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, Nicole. 2011. “Do-It-Yourself: The Precarious Work and Postfeminist Politics of Handmaking (in) Detroit.” Utopian Studies 22 (2): 261–284. doi:10.5325/utopianstudies.22.2.0261.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman K. 1997. Interpretive Ethnography Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ekinsmyth, Carol. 2012. “Family Friendly Entrepreneurship: New Business Formation in Family Spaces.” Urbani Izziv 23 (1 Spec): 115–125. doi:10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2012-23-supplement-1-011.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, Rita. 2000. Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, Rita. 2000. Doing time: Feminist theory and postmodern culture. Vol. 11. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, Shulamith, and Rosalind Delmar. 1979. The Dialectic of sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. London: Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, Richard L. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And how It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Friedan, Betty. 1963. The Feminine Mystique. London: Gollancz.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, Judy. 2004. The Parlour and the Suburb: Domestic Identities, Class, Femininity and Modernity. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind, and Andy Pratt. 2008. “In the Social Factory?: Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work.” Theory, Culture & Society 25 (7-8): 1–30. doi:10.1177/0263276408097794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, Melissa. 2011. Work's Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gurstein, Penny. 2002. Wired to the World, Chained to the Home: Telework in Daily Life. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. 1999. “Affective Labor.” Boundary 2 26 (2): 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haseman, Brad. 2006. “A Manifesto for Performative Research [Paper in: Practice-led Research. Green, Lelia and Haseman, Brad (eds).].” Media International Australia Incorporating Culture & Policy 118: 98–106. doi:10.3316/ielapa.200603420.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1997. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. 1st ed. ed.When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Howkins, John. 2018. Creative ecologies: where thinking is a proper job. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, Andrea. 2015. “Get off my Internets: The Audience Commodity and the Mommy Blog Backlash.” Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on social media & society.
   Google Scholar
• Huws, Ursula. 2015. “When Adam Blogs: Cultural Work and the Gender Division of Labour in Utopia.” The Sociological Review (Keele) 63 (S1): 158–173. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12247.
   Google Scholar
• Jeremiah, Emily. 2006. “Motherhood to Mothering and Beyond: Maternity in Recent Feminist Thought.” Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement 8 (1-2): 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• John-Steiner, Vera. 1992. “Creative Lives, Creative Tensions.” Creativity Research Journal 5 (1): 99–108. doi:10.1080/10400419209534426.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Rachel, and Stephen Kaplan. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Jenny, Michael Arnold, Martin Gibbs, Bjorn Nansen, and Rowan Wilken. 2020. Digital Domesticity: Media, Materiality, and Home Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, Amit, and Karen Z. Kramer. 2020. “The Potential Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Occupational Status, Work from Home, and Occupational Mobility.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 119: 103442–103442. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacouture, Elizabeth. 2019. “Translating Domesticity in Chinese History and Historiography.” The American Historical Review 124 (4): 1278–1289. doi:10.1093/ahr/rhz644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. 2008. Smart Living: Lifestyle Media and Popular Expertise. New York, USA: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Luckman, Susan. 2013. “The Aura of the Analogue in a Digital age: Women's Crafts, Creative Markets and Home-Based Labour After Etsy.” Cultural Studies Review 19 (1): 249–270. doi:10.5130/csr.v19i1.2585.
   Google Scholar
• Luckman, Susan. 2015. Craft and the Creative Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Luckman, Susan, and Jane Andrew. 2020. Craftspeople and Designer Makers in the Contemporary Creative Economy. First Edition, 2020. ed. Creative Working Lives. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, Lydia, and Emma Casey. 2016. Gender and Consumption: Domestic Cultures and the Commercialisation of Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 2016. Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. [1st American ed.]. ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matchar, Emily. 2014. Homeward bound: why women are embracing the new domesticity. First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition.. ed. Place of publication not identified]: Place of publication not identified: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, Janetta Mitchell, and Gary W Evans. 2002. “The Potential Role of the Physical Environment in Fostering Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 14 (3-4): 409–426. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeon, Michael. 2005. The Secret History of Domesticity Public, Private, and the Division of Knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, Angela. 2011. “Reflections On Feminism, Immaterial Labour And The Post-Fordist Regime.” New Formations 70 (70): 60–76. doi:10.3898/NEWF.70.04.2010.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Kerry. 2007. ‘Etsy: A Site for Artisans Takes Off’, Bloomsberg Businessweek, 12 June 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, Ann. 1985. The Sociology of Housework. Reprinted with a new Introd. ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, Paul. 2017. “Home.” 1st ed. In Contemporary Liminality Ser. Milton: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. Economic and social impacts of cultural and creative sectors. Note for Italy G20 Presidency Culture Working Group. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/OECD-G20-Culture-July-2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla Carroll, Valerie. 2016. “The Radical Possibilities of New (Feminist, Environmentalist) Domesticity: Housewifery as an Altermodernity Project.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 23 (1): 51–70. doi:10.1093/isle/isw013.
   Google Scholar
• Raisborough, J. 2011. Lifestyle Media and the Formation of the Self. 1st ed. 2011.. ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan. UK: Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reid-Musson, Emily, Daniel Cockayne, Lia Frederiksen, and Nancy Worth. 2020. “Feminist Economic Geography and the Future of Work.” Environment and Planning. A 52 (7): 1457–1468. doi:10.1177/0308518X20947101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, Peter, and Peter Williams. 1988. “The Constitution of the Home: Towards a Research Agenda.” Housing Studies 3 (2): 81–93. doi:10.1080/02673038808720618.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Joan Wallach, and Debra Keates. 2004. Going Public: Feminism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Private Sphere. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, Kate. 2004. ““Rethinking the “Good Life": The Consumer as Citizen.”.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 15 (3): 111–116. doi:10.1080/1045575042000247293.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Stephanie. 2011. “Negotiating Oppositions and Uncertainties: Gendered Conflicts in Creative Identity Work.” Feminism & Psychology 21 (3): 354–371. doi:10.1177/0959353510386095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Stephanie. 2015. “A new Mystique? Working for Yourself in the Neoliberal Economy.” The Sociological Review (Keele) 63 (S1): 174–187. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12248.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Stephanie, and Karen Littleton. 2012. Contemporary Identities of Creativity and Creative Work. 1 ed. Milton: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, Marilyn J. 1988. Counting for Nothing: What men Value & What Women are Worth. Wellington, N.Z: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Kathryn J. H., Kate E. Lee, Terry Hartig, Leisa D. Sargent, Nicholas S. G. Williams, and Katherine A. Johnson. 2018. “Conceptualising Creativity Benefits of Nature Experience: Attention Restoration and Mind Wandering as Complementary Processes.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 59: 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar