Demographics and Research Activity Among 2023 Academic Glaucoma Specialists

References

• Chen X, Zafar S, Srikumaran D, et al. Factors influencing postgraduate career decisions of ophthalmology residents. J Aca Ophthalmol. 2020;12(2):e124–e133. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1715808.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon A. Publishing and academic promotion. Singapore Med J. 2009;50(9):847–850. doi:10.4000/monderusse.7187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susarla SM, Lopez J, Swanson EW, et al. Are quantitative measures of academic productivity correlated with academic rank in plastic surgery? A national study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(3):613–621. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benway BM, Kalidas P, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB. Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology. 2009;74(1):30–33. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang G, Fang CH, Lopez SA, Bhagat N, Langer PD, Eloy JA. Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic ophthalmology. J Surg Educ. May-June, 2015;72(3):410–7. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali MJ, Djalilian A. Readership awareness series – paper 7: an overview of impact factor and other scientometrics. Ocul Surf. October 01, 2023;30:236–239. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2023.09.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(46):16569–72. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102. November 15 2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svider PF, Choudhry ZA, Choudhry OJ, Baredes S, Liu JK, Eloy JA. The use of the h‐index in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):103–106. doi:10.1002/lary.23569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT. Use of the h index in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(2):387–392. doi:10.3171/2008.10.JNS08978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad AE, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. The H-index in academic radiology. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(7):817–821. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bould M, Boet S, Sharma B, Shin E, Barrowman N, Grantcharov T. H-indices in a university department of anaesthesia: an evaluation of their feasibility, reliability, and validity as an assessment of academic performance. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(3):325–330. doi:10.1093/bja/aeq403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann L, Daniel HD. The state of h index research: is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Rep. 2009;10(1):2–6. doi:10.1038/embor.2008.233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali MJ. Forewarned is forearmed: the h-index as a scientometric. Semin Ophthalmol. February 17, 2021;36(1–2):1–1. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1894889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Influence Module. National Institute Of Health. 2022. https://icite.od.nih.gov/user_guide?page_id=ug_infl#:~:text=The%20Relative%20Citation%20Ratio%20is,the%20corresponding%20year%20of%20publication
   Google Scholar
• Patel PA, Ali MJ. The Relative Citation Ratio: A Brief Primer on the National institutes of Health-Supported Bibliometric. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022; 37(5):539–540. doi:10.1080/08820538.2022.2088981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eloy JA, Svider PF, Cherla DV, et al. Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians. Laryngoscope. August, 2013;123(8):1865–1875. doi:10.1002/lary.24039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eloy JA, Svider P, Chandrasekhar SS, et al. Gender disparities in scholarly productivity within academic otolaryngology departments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. February, 2013;148(2):215–22. doi:10.1177/0194599812466055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomei KL, Nahass MM, Husain Q, et al. A gender-based comparison of academic rank and scholarly productivity in academic neurological surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(7):1102–1105. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrail MR, O’sullivan BG, Bendotti HR, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S. Importance of publishing research varies by doctors’ career stage, specialty and location of work. Postgrad Med J. 2019;95(1122):198–204. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-136473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendiratta D, Herzog I, Vought R, et al. The relative citation ratio: an impartial assessment of productivity in academic otolaryngologists. Laryngoscope. 2023. doi:10.1002/lary.30876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganjei AY, Shalaby WS, Wu C, Al-Aswad LA, Myers JS, Shukla AG. Descriptive analysis of United States glaucoma fellowship program directors. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. March 01, 2022;5(2):241–244. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.10.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang A, Xu H, Keehn C, Lee AG. Reply: ganjei et al.: descriptive analysis of United States glaucoma fellowship program directors. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022;5(5):e26. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2022.05.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bureau UC. Geographic Levels. United States Census Bureau. 2023. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census/guidance-geographies/levels.html
   Google Scholar
• Gill HK, Niederer RL, Shriver EM, Gordon LK, Coleman AL, Danesh-Meyer HV. An eye on gender equality: a review of the evolving role and representation of women in ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol. April 01, 2022;236:232–240. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barinsky GL, Daoud D, Tan D, et al. Gender representation at conferences, Executive boards, and program committees in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(2):E373–E379. doi:10.1002/lary.28823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton E, Jebaraj A, Eddington D, Brintz BJ, Simpson RG, Pettey JH. Gender Representation Among Presenters in Ophthalmology Subspecialties in 2019: A Retrospective Review. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;242:18–25. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2022.05.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarocki A, Eton EA, Young BK, Everett LA. Gender differences among US vitreoretinal surgical and medical retina fellowship program directors. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. October 01, 2022;260(10):3401–3402. doi:10.1007/s00417-022-05673-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhar J, Kuriyan AE, Yonekawa Y, et al. Representation of women in vitreoretinal meeting faculty roles from 2015 through 2019. Am J Ophthalmol. January 01, 2021;221:131–136. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directors ABo. AAMC Statement On Gender Equity. 2023. https://www.aamc.org/about-us/equity-diversity-inclusion/aamc-statement-gender-equity
   Google Scholar
• Boatright D, London M, Soriano AJ, et al. Strategies and best practices to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion among US graduate medical education programs. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(2):e2255110–e2255110. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minority Mentoring. 2023. https://www.aao.org/minority-mentoring
   Google Scholar
• Sellers H Task force on women’s academic careers in medicine. 2023. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/medicine/faculty-staff/task-force/
   Google Scholar
• American Medical Women’s Association Mentoring. 2023. https://www.amwa-doc.org/
   Google Scholar
• Koehler TJ, Goodfellow J, Davis AT, vanSchagen JE, Schuh L. Physician retention in the same state as residency training: data from 1 Michigan GME institution. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(4):518–522. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-15-00431.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen SA, Fisher AC, Pershing S. Evaluation of website accessibility and content for all glaucoma fellowship programs in the United States. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022;5(4):462–464. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.11.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ophthalmology Statistics. 2022. https://sfmatch.org/specialty/ophthalmology-fellowship/Statistics
   Google Scholar
• Gedde SJ, Budenz DL, Haft P, Lee Y, Quigley HA. Factors affecting the decision to pursue glaucoma fellowship training. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(1):81–87. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000243474.36213.08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton E, Arsiwala LT, Johnson TV, Srikumaran D, Zafar S, Woreta FA. Applicant characteristics associated with glaucoma fellowship match from 2010 to 2017. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. March-April, 2022;5(2):233–240. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.08.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dotan G, Qureshi HM, Gaton DD. Chairs of United States academic ophthalmology departments: a descriptive analysis and trends. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;196:26–33. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svider PF, Lopez SA, Husain Q, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD. The association between scholarly impact and national institutes of health funding in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. January, 2014;121(1):423–428. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershoni A, Tiosano A, Gabbay O, et al. Academic background, professional experience, and research achievements of United States academic ophthalmology leadership. Ir J Med Sci. November, 2021;190(4):1605–1611. doi:10.1007/s11845-020-02495-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill HK, Niederer RL, Danesh‐Meyer HV. Gender differences in surgical case volume among ophthalmology trainees. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;49(7):664–671. doi:10.1111/ceo.13969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour AM, Shields CL, Maalouf FC, et al. Five-decade profile of women in leadership positions at ophthalmic publications. Arch Ophthalmol. November, 2012;130(11):1441–1446. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar