Resistant starches as a vehicle for delivering health benefits to the human large bowel

References

• Jemal A, Ward E, Hao Y, Thun M. Trends in the leading causes of death in the United States, 1970–2002. JAMA 2005; 294: 1255–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascie-Taylor CG, Karim E. The burden of chronic disease. Science 2003; 302: 1921–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson AJ, Mathers JC. Effecting dietary change. Proc Nutr Soc 2004; 63: 537–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghurst KI, Hope AK, Down EC. Dietary fibre intake in a group of institutionalized elderly and the effects of a fibre supplementation program on nutrient intake and weight gain. Community Health Stud 1985; 9: 99–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baghurst PA, Baghurst KI, Record SJ. Dietary fibre, non-starch polysaccharides and resistant starch – a review. Food Aust 1996; 48(Suppl)S3–S35
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and Australasian Association of Cancer Registries. Cancer in Australia 2001. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (Cancer Series 28), 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Park Y, Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Bergkvist L, Berrino F, van den Brandt PA, et al. Dietary fiber intake and risk of colo-rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies. JAMA 2005; 294: 2849–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Corle D, Lance P, Iber F, Caan B, et al. Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1149–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham SA, Day NE, Luben R, Ferrari P, Slimani N, Norat T, et al. Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study. Lancet 2003; 361: 1496–1501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkitt DP. Some diseases characteristic of western civilisation. BMJ 1973; 2: 274–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiller GA. Definition of dietary fiber. CRC handbook of dietary fiber in human nutrition, GA Spiller. CRC Press, Boca Raton 1993; 15
   Google Scholar
• Topping DL, Clifton PM. Short chain fatty acids and human colonic function – roles of resistant starch and non-starch polysaccharides. Physiol Rev 2001; 81: 1031–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. The intestinal effects of bran-like plastic particles: is the concept of ‘roughage’ valid after all?. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997; 9: 553–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe SJ, Kidd M, Espitalier-Noel G, Owira P. Rarity of colon cancer in Africans is associated with low animal product consumption, not fiber. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 1373–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asp N-G. Resistant starch. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992; 46(Suppl 2)S1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson IH, Levine AS, Levitt MD. Incomplete absorption of the carbohydrate in an all purpose wheat flour. N Engl J Med 1981; 304: 891–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishna BS, Venkataraman S, Srinivasan S, Dash P, Young GP, Binder HJ. Amylase-resistant starch plus oral rehydration solution for cholera. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 308–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouns F, Kettlitz B, Arrigoni E. Resistant starch and the “butyrate revolution”. Trends Food Sci Tech 2002; 13: 251–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Munster IP, Tangerman A, Nagengast FM. Effect of resistant starch on colonic fermentation, bile acid metabolism and mucosal proliferation. Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39: 834–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed R, Segal I, Hassan H. Fermentation of dietary starch in humans. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1017–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal I. Physiological small bowel malabsorption of carbohydrates protects against large bowel diseases in Africans. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17: 249–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe SJ, Chung D, Mahmoud N, Sepulveda AR, Manafe M, Arch J, et al. Why do African Americans get more colonic cancer than native Africans?. J Nutr 2007; 137(Suppl 1)175S–182S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Leu RK, Brown IL, Hu Y, Morita T, Esterman A, Young GP. Effect of dietary resistant starch and protein on colonic fermentation and intestinal tumorigenesis in rats. Carcinogenesis 2007; 28: 240–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau NM, Martin LJ, Toquet CS, Laboisse CL, Nguyen PG, Siliart BS, et al. Restoration of the integrity of rat caeco-colonic mucosa by resistant starch, but not by fructo-oligosaccharides in dextran sulphate sodium-induced experimental colitis. Br J Nutr 2003; 90: 75–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy A, Bingham SA, Cummings JH. Starch intake and colorectal cancer risk: an international comparison. Br J Cancer 1994; 69: 937–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norat T, Bingham S, Ferrari P, Slimani N, Jenab M, Mazuir M, et al. Meat, fish, and colo-rectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into cancer and nutrition. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 906–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toden S, Bird AR, Topping DL, Conlon MA. Resistant starch attenuates colonic DNA damage induced by high dietary protein in rats. Nutr Cancer 2005; 51: 45–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toden S, Bird AR, Topping DL, Conlon MA. Dose-dependent reduction of dietary protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage by resistant starch in rats correlates more highly with caecal butyrate than with other short chain fatty acids. Cancer Biol Ther 2007; 6: 253–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toden S, Bird AR, Topping DL, Conlon MA. Resistant starch prevents colonic DNA damage induced by high dietary cooked red meat or casein in rats. Cancer Biol Ther 2006; 5: 267–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toden S, Bird AR, Topping DL, Conlon MA. Differential effects of dietary whey, casein and soy on colonic DNA damage in rats. Br J Nutr 2007; 97: 535–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown IL, McNaught KJ, Moloney E. Hi-Maize™ – new directions in starch technology and nutrition. Food Aust 1995; 47: 272–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown IL. Applications and uses of resistant starch. J AOAC Int 2004; 87: 727–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noakes M, Clifton PM, Nestel PJ, Leu R, Mcintosh G. Effect of high amylose starch and oat bran on metabolic variables and bowel function in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. Am J Clin Nutr 1996; 64: 944–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symonds EL, Kritas S, Omari TI, Butler RN. A combined 13CO2/H2 breath test can be used to assess starch digestion and fermentation in humans. J Nutr 2004; 134: 1193–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morell MK, Kosar-Hashemi B, Cmiel M, Samuel MS, Chandler P, Rahman S, et al. Barley sex6 mutants lack starch synthase IIa activity and contain a starch with novel properties. Plant J 2003; 34: 172–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird AR, Flory C, Davies DA, Usher S, Topping DL. A novel barley cultivar (Himalaya 292) with a specific gene mutation in starch synthase IIa resulting in altered grain starch and non-starch polysaccharide composition raises large bowel starch and short chain fatty acids in rats. J Nutr 2004; 134: 831–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird AR, Jackson M, King RA, Davies DA, Usher S, Topping DL. A novel barley cultivar (Himalaya 292), high in amylose and soluble and insoluble non-starch polysaccharides, lowers plasma cholesterol and alters indices of large bowel health in pigs. Br J Nutr 2004; 97: 607–15
   Google Scholar
• Regina A, Bird A, Topping D, Bowden S, Freeman J, Barsby T, et al. A high amylose wheat generated by RNA-interference improves indices of large bowel health in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 3546–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annison G, Illman RJ, Topping DL. Acetylated, propionylated or butyrylated starches raise large bowel short-chain fatty acids preferentially when fed to rats. J Nutr 2003; 133: 3523–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita T, Kasaoka S, Kiriyama S, Brown IL, Topping DL. Comparative effects of acetylated and unmodified high amylose maize starch in rats. Starch/Stärke 2005; 57: 246–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajka B, Topping DL, Cobiac L, Clarke JM. Butyrylated starch is less susceptible to enzymic hydrolysis and increases large-bowel butyrate more than high-amylose maize starch in the rat. Br J Nutr 2006; 95: 1–8
   Google Scholar