The Precautionary Principle Applied to Deliberate Release of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)

References

• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Devel-opment). Field releases of transgenic plants 1986–1992: An analysis. Paris: OECD, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson M, Perrins J, Fitter A. Releasing genetically engi-neered plants: present proposals and possible hazards. TREE 1990; 5: 417–9.
   Google Scholar
• Traavik T. Too early may bee to late. Ecological risks associ-ated with the use of naked DNA as a biological tool for resea, production and therapy. Research report for DN, No 1999–1. Trondheim, Norway: Directorate for Nature Management, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rissler J, Mellon M. The ecological risks of engineered crops. Massachusetts: The MIT press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson JK. Tracking genetically engineered microorganisms in nature. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1995; 6: 275–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen TR, Andersen B, Jorgensen RB. The risk of crop transgene spread. Nature 1996; 380: 31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevre AM, Eber F, Baranger A, Renard M. Gene flow from transgenic crops. Nature 1997; 389: 924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox JL. Farmers say Monsanto's engineered cotton drops bolls. Nat Biotechnol. 1997; 15: 1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams N. Agricultural biotech faces backlash in Europe. Science 1998; 281: 768–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J, Abouchar, J. The precautionary principle: A fundamental principle of law and policy for the protection of the global environment. Boston Coll Int Comp Law Rev 1991 XIV: 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Freestone D, Hey E. Origins and the development of the precautionary principle. In: Freestone D, Hey E, eds. The Precautionary Principle and International Law. The Nether-lands: Kluwer Law International, 1996: 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Boehmer-Christiansen S. The precautionary principle in Ger-many-enabling government. In: O'Riordan T, Cameron J, eds. Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Earth-s= Publications, 1994: 30–60.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Agenda 21: The United Nations programme of action from Rio. New York: United Nations, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky D. Scientific uncertainty and the precautionary principle. Environment 1991; 33: 4–5 continued on 43-45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhl-Mortensen L, Welin S. The ethics of doing policy rele-vant science: The precautionary principle and the significance of non-significant result. Sci Eng Ethics 1998; 4: 401–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser M. Fish-farming and the precautionary principle: con-text and values in environmental science for policy. Found Sci 1997; 2: 307–41.
   Google Scholar
• O'Riordan T, Jordan A. The precautionary principle in con-temporary environmental politics. Environ Values 1995; 4: 191–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Devel-opment). Recombinant DNA safety considerations. Paris: OECD, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Covello VT, Merkhofer MW. Risk assessment methods; Ap-proaches for assessing health and environmental risks. New York: Plenum Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg R. An appraisal of the working in practice of directive 90/220/EEC on the deliberate release of Genetically Modified Organisms. Working Document for the STOA Panel. Luxembourg: European Parliament, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Syvanen M. Horizontal gene transfer: Evidence and possible consequences. Annu Rev Genet 1994; 28: 237–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruesink JL, Parker IM, Groom MJ, Kareiva PM. Reducing the risks of non indigenous species introduction. BioScience 1995; 45: 465–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedje JM, Colwell RK, Grossmann YL, et al. The planned Introduction of genetically engineered organisms: Ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology 1989; 70: 298–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergelson J, Purrington CP, Wichmann G. Promiscuity in transgenic plants. Nature 1998; 395: 25.
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell L. Lateral transfer in natural populations of eukary-otes. Annu Rev Genet 1993; 27: 235–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolitle WF. You are what you eat: A gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eucaryotic nuclear genomes. Trends Genet 1998; 14: 307–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnapillai V. Horizontal gene transfer. J Genet 1996; 75: 219–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin X, Stotzky G. Gene transfer among bacteria in natural environments. Adv Appl Microbiol 1997; 45: 153–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse H, Jansson J. The use of antibiotic resistance genes as marker genes in genetically modified organism. Report 97:03. Oslo: Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Perreten V, Schwarz F, Cresta L, Boeglin M, Dasen G, Teuber M. Antibiotic resistance spread in food. Nature 1997; 389: 801–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapuscinski A. Implications of introduction of transgenic fish into natural ecosystems. In: Environmental impacts of aquatic biotechnology. Paris: OECD, 1995: 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Doerfler W, Schubbert R, Heller H, et al. Integration of foreign DNA and its consequences in mammalian systems. TIBTECH 1997; 15: 297–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matic I, Taddei F, Radman M. Genetic barriers among bacteria. Trends Microbiol 1996; 4: 69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Colbom T. The wildlife/human connection: modernizing risk decisions. Environ Health Perspect 1994; 102: 55–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz MG, Wackernagel W. Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in the environment. Microbiol Rev 1994; 58: 563–602.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paget E, Simonet P. On the track of natural transformation in soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecology 1994; 15: 109–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez AJ, Yumet GM, Santiago CL, Toranzos GA. Stabil-ity of manipulated plasmid DNA in aquatic environments. Environ Toxicol Water Qual 1996; 11: 129–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schubbert R, Lettman C, Doerfler W. Foreign (m13) DNA ingested by mice reaches peripheral leukocytes spleen and liver via intestinal wall mucosa and can be covalently linked to mouse DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997; 94: 961–6.
   Google Scholar
• Blum SAE, Lorenz MG, Wackernagel W. Persistence of DNA in natural soils: Adsorption to particulate material provides protection against nucleolytic degradation. In: Schmidt ER, Hankeln T, eds. Transgenic organisms and biosafety. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1996: 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Inose T, Murata K. Enhanced accumulation of toxic com-pound in yeast cells having high glycolytic activity: a case study on the safety of genetically engineered yeast. Int .1- Food Sci Technol 1995; 30: 141–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maessen GDF. Genomic stability and stability of expression in genetically modified plants. Acta Bot Neerl 1997; 46: 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Backhaus H, Nickel A, Fritsch E, et al. From gene transfer to risk assessment: Experiences with genetic variability in Bac-uloviruses and new approaches to analyze the reaction of microbial communities to stress factors. In: Schmidt ER, Hankeln T, eds. Transgenic organisms and biosafety. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1996: 43–67.
   Google Scholar
• Greene AE, Allison RF. Recombination between viral RNA and transgenic plant transcript. Science 1994; 263: 1423–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson M. Community response to transgenic plant re-lease: predictions from British experience of invasive plants and feral crop plants. Mol Ecol 1994; 3: 75–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandle JE, McHugh SG, James L, Labbe H, Miki BL. Instability of transgene expression in field grown tobacco carrying the csr 1-1 gene for sulfonylurea herbicide resistance. Bio/Technology 1995; 13: 994–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers HJ, Parkes HC. Transgenic plants and the environ-ment. J Exp Bot 1995; 46: 467–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaala O. Possible genetic and ecological effects of escaped saGMOnids in aquaculture. In: Environmental impacts of aquatic biotechnology. Paris: OECD, 1995: 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Dale PJ, Schaller JA. Gene dispersal from transgenic crops. In: Schmidt ER, Hankeln T, eds. Transgenic organisms and biosafety. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1996: 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Estruch JJ, Carozzi NB, Desai N, Duck NB, Warren GW, Koziel MG. Transgenic plants: An emerging approach to pest control. Nat Biotechnol 1997; 15: 137–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould F. Sustainability of transgenic cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 1998; 43: 701–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabashnik BE, Liv YB, Finson N, Masson L, Heckel DG. One gene in diamondback moth confers resistance to four Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997; 94: 1640–4.
   Google Scholar
• Gledhill M, McGrath P. Call for a spin doctor. New Scientist 1997; 1 November: 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bonning BC, Hammock BD. Development of recombinant baculoviruses for insect control. Annu Rev Entomol 1996; 41: 191–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann C, Sandig V, Jennings G, Rudolph M, Schlag P, Strauss M. Efficient gene transfer into human hepatocytes by baculovirus vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1995; 92: 10099–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann C, Strauss M. Baculovirus-mediated gene transfer in the presence of human serum or blood facilitated by inhibition of the complement system. Gene Ther 1998; 5: 516–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfray HCJ. Field experiments with genetically manipulated insect viruses: ecological issues. TREE 1995; 10: 465–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene AE, Allison RF. Deletions in the 3' untranslated region of cowpea chlorotic mottle virus transgene reduce recovery of recombinant viruses in transgenic plants. Virology 1996; 225: 231–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvik T, Tryland M, Hansen H, et al. Naturally occurring orthopxviruses: Potential for recombination with vaccine vec-tors. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 2542–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheale P, McNally R. Biotechnology policy in Europe: a critical evaluation. Sci Public Policy 1993; 20: 261–79.
   Google Scholar
• Parker IM, Kareiva P. Assessing the risks of invasion for genetically engineered plants: Acceptable evidence and rea-sonable doubt. Biol Consery 1996; 1: 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz PLJ, Nap JP. A transgene-centred approach to the biosafety of transgenic plants, overview of selection and re-porter genes. Acta Bot Neerl 1997; 46: 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Regal PJ. Scientific principles for ecologically based risk assessment of transgenic organisms. Mol Ecol 1994; 3: 5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommerds BÁ, Johnsen O, Skroppa T, Hindar K, Holten J, Tufto J. Long-term environmental impacts of release of trans-genic Norway spruce (Picea abies). NINA-NIKU Project Report 003. Trondheim, Norway, 1996: 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gliddon C. The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: biological models and theoretical perspectives. Mol Ecol 1994; 3: 41–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt J, Linder CR. Will escaped transgenes lead to ecolog-ical release? Mol Ecol 1994; 3: 71–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale PJ, Irwing JA, Scheffier JA. The experimental and commercial release of transgenic crop plants. Plant Breed 1993; 111: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Biotechnology Advisory Board. Transgene oilseed rape toler-ant to herbicides (1994-07-08). 1997, Internett: http:// www.bion.no
   Google Scholar
• Levidow L, Carr S, von Schomberg R, Wield D. Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe: harmonisation difficulties, opportunities, dilemmas. Sci Public Policy 1996; 23: 135–57.
   Google Scholar
• ACRE. Advisory Committee of Release to the Environment. UK regulator system. Annual Report No. 2: 1994/95. Lon-don: Department of the Environment, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Lemons J, Shrader-Frechette K, Cranor C. The precautionary principle; scientific uncertainty and type I and type II errors. Found Sci 1997; 2: 207–36.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowitz SO, Ravetz JR. Science for the post normal age. Futures 1993; 25: 739–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand U. Fragmented law fromunitary to pluralistic legal systems: A socio-legal perspective of post-national legal sys-tems. Working paper no. 18/97 Arena. Norway: University of Oslo, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne B, Mayer S. Evaluating the consequences of releasing genetically modified organisms. In: International conference on the release and use of Genetically Modified Organisms: Sustainable development and Legal control. Oslo: The Nor-wegian Biotechnology Advisory Board, 1995: 51–69.
   Google Scholar
• Gene Technology Act 1993. The Act relating to the produc-tion and use of genetically modified organisms. Act no. 38 of 2 April 1993, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette K. Ethics of Scientific research. Boston: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• The National Committees for resarch Ethics. Fast salmon and technoburger, report from the consensus conference on genet-ically modified food, 18–21 October 1996. Oslo: Forsk-ingsparken, 1996
   Google Scholar