310
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Using Social Learning Analytic Methods to Examine Social Construction of Knowledge in Online Discussions

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all

References

  • Buraphadeja, V., & Dawson, K. (2008). Content analysis in computer-mediated communication: Analyzing models for assessing critical thinking through the lens of social constructivism. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 130–145. doi:10.1080/08923640802224568
  • Chai, C. -S., & Tan, S. -C. (2009). Professional development of teachers for computer-supported collaborative learning: A knowledge-building approach. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 111(5), 1296–1327. doi:10.1177/016146810911100503
  • Commander, N., Zhao, Y., Gallagher, P., & You, Y. (2016). Cross-national online discussions: International learning experiences with American and Chinese students in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 365–374. doi:10.1080/14703297.2015.1006524
  • Cragg, C. E., Dunning, J., & Ellis, J. (2008). Teacher and student behaviors in face-to-face and on-line courses: Dealing with complex concepts. Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 115–128.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Davis, D., & Marone, V. (2016). Learning in discussion forums: An analysis of knowledge construction in a gaming affinity space. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 6(3), 1–17. doi:10.4018/IJGBL.2016070101
  • De Wever, B., Keer, H. V., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 516–523. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.008
  • Floren, L., Cate, O., Irby, D., & O’Brien, B. (2020). An interaction analysis model to study knowledge construction in interprofessional education: Proof of concept. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(5), 736–743. 10.1080/13561820.2020.1797653
  • Gunawardena, C. N., Flor, N. V., Gomez, D., & Sanchez, D. (2016). Analyzing social construction of knowledge online by employing interaction analysis, learning analytics, and social network analysis. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(3), 35–60.
  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. doi:10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
  • Guo, C., Shea, P., & Chen, X. (2022). Investigation on graduate students’ social presence and social knowledge construction in two online discussion settings. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 2751–2769. 10.1007/s10639-021-10716-8
  • Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383–1392. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.012
  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2011). Student facilitators’ habits of mind and their influences on higher-level knowledge construction occurrences in online discussions: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(3), 275–285. doi:10.1080/14703297.2011.593704
  • Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J. (2018). Automated text analysis for consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1274–1306. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx104
  • Huntley, B. C., Thatcher, A., Simos, T. E., & Psihoyios, G. (2008). The impact of time delay on the content of discussions at a computer-mediated conference. AIP Conference Proceedings, 38–41. 10.1063/1.3037100
  • Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13, 315–329.
  • Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C. N., & Moreira, A. N. (2014). Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 574–582. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050
  • Luebeck, J. L., & Bice, L. R. (2005). Online discussion as a mechanism of conceptual change among mathematics and science teachers. The Journal of Distance Education/Revue de L’ducation Distance, 20(2), 21–39.
  • Megli, A. (2022). Exploring the relationship between social presence and the social construction of knowledge ( Doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico.
  • Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x
  • Moore, J. L., & Marra, R. M. (2005). A comparative analysis of online discussion participation protocols. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 191–212. doi:10.1080/15391523.2005.10782456
  • Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Human Learning (3rd ed.). Merrill: Pearson.
  • Osman, G., & Herring, S. C. (2007). Interaction, facilitation, and deep learning in cross-cultural chat: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(2), 125–141. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.03.004
  • Prestridge, S., & Cox, D. (2021). Play like a team in teams: A typology of online cognitive-social learning engagement. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(1), 24(1. doi:10.1177/1469787421990986
  • Quek, C. L. (2010). Analysing high school students’ participation and interaction in an asynchronous online project-based learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3). doi:10.14742/ajet.1078
  • Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
  • Sanchez, D. M. (2019). Building a call to action: Social action in networks of practice ( Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico). The University of New Mexico Digital Repository. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/oils_etds/51/
  • Sun, Z., Lin, C., Lv, K., & Song, J. (2021). Knowledge-construction behaviors in a mobile learning environment: A lag-sequential analysis of group differences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 533–551. doi:10.1007/s11423-021-09938-x
  • Tawfik, A., Koehler, A., Gish-Lieberman, J., & Gatewood, J. (2021). Investigating the depth of problem-solving prompts in collaborative argumentation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1966821
  • Valtonen, T., López-Pernas, S., Saqr, M., Vartiainen, H., Sointu, E. T., & Tedre, M. (2022). The nature and building blocks of educational technology research. Computers in Human Behavior, 128. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107123
  • Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2020). Effects of online teaching presence on students’ interactions and collaborative knowledge construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 370–382. doi:10.1111/jcal.12408
  • Yang, Y. -T.C., Newby, T., & Bill, R. (2008). Facilitating interactions through structured web-based bulletin boards: A quasi-experimental study on promoting learners’ critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1572–1585. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.006
  • Zhang, N., Liu, Q., Zheng, X., Luo, L., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Analysis of social interaction and behavior patterns in the process of online to offline lesson study: A case study of chemistry teaching design based on augmented reality. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4), 815–836. doi:10.1080/02188791.2020.1866493

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.