Framing Matters for Ontological Politics of the Ocean: Contrasting European Union Policy Framings with Recreationists’ Alternative Experiences of a Living Sea World

References

• Acton, L., L. M. Campbell, J. Cleary, N. J. Gray, and P. N. Halpin. 2019. What is the Sargasso Sea? The problem of fixing space in a fluid ocean. Political Geography 68:86–100. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. 2016. What I talk about when I talk about kayaking. In J. Anderson & K. Peters (Eds.), Water worlds: Human geographies of the ocean, 121–36. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.routledge.com/Water-Worlds-Human-Geographies-of-the-Ocean/Peters-Anderson/p/book/9781138248656
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. 2014. Mind over matter? On decentring the human in human geography. Cultural Geographies 21 (1):3–18. doi:10.1177/1474474013513409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Maldonado, M. 2015. Environment and society: Socionatural relations in the anthropocene. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15952-2
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, M. 2019. New materialism: An ontology for the anthropocene. Natural Resources Journal 59 (2):251–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser, M. 2009. Political ontology: cultural studies without ‘cultures’? Cultural Studies 23 (5–6):873–96. doi:10.1080/09502380903208023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucquey, N., L. Fairbanks, K. S. Martin, L. M. Campbell, and B. McCay. 2016. The ontological politics of marine spatial planning: Assembling the ocean and shaping the capacities of ‘community’ and ‘environment. Geoforum 75:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Posthuman-p-9780745641584
   Google Scholar
• Burman, A. 2017. The political ontology of climate change: moral meteorology, climate justice, and the coloniality of reality in the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Political Ecology 24 (1):921–30. doi:10.2458/v24i1.20974.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2001. Socializing nature: Theory, practice, and politics. In N. Castree & B. Braun (Eds.), Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., V. Braun, and N. Hayfield. 2015. Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods 222 (2015): 248.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 2019. Ecosystem approach principles. https://www.cbd.int/ecosystem/principles.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• de Rijke, K., P. Munro, and M. D. L. M. Zurita. 2016. The Great Artesian Basin: A contested resource environment of subterranean water and coal seam gas in Australia. Society & Natural Resources 29 (6):696–710. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1122133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, M., Á. Borja, and R. Cormier. 2020. Managing marine resources sustainably: A proposed integrated systems analysis approach. Ocean & Coastal Management 197:105315. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1999. After nature: Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology 40 (1):1–30. doi:10.1086/515799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0056.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament  and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning (Framework for maritime spatial planning). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014L0089
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., and Ó. Cinnèide. 2012. Stakeholder participation in marine spatial planning: lessons from the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary. Society & Natural Resources 25 (8):727–42. doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.627913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, L. A., G. Glegg, S. Fletcher, W. Dodds, M. Philippe, and D. Bailly. 2020. Using ecosystem service assessments to support participatory marine spatial planning. Ocean & Coastal Management 188:105121. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, K., N. Blazauskas, K. Dahl, C. Göke, B. Hassler, A. Kannen, N. Leposa, A. Morf, H. Strand, and B. Weig. 2019. Can tools contribute to integration in MSP? A comparative review of selected tools and approaches. Ocean & Coastal Management 179:104834. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granek, E. F., S. Polasky, C. V. Kappel, D. J. Reed, D. M. Stoms, E. W. Koch, C. J. Kennedy, L. A. Cramer, S. D. Hacker, and E. B. Barbier. 2010. Ecosystem services as a common language for coastal ecosystem‐based management. Conservation Biology 24 (1):207–16. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01355.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humberstone, B., and M. Brown. 2016. Seascapes: Shaped by the sea: Embodies narratives and fluid geographies. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315607931
   Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S. 2017. Small-scale fisheries within maritime spatial planning: Knowledge integration and power. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19 (3):266–78. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2017.1304210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadfak, A., and P. Knutsson. 2017. Investigating the waterfront: The entangled sociomaterial transformations of coastal space in Karnataka. Society & Natural Resources 30 (6):707–22. doi:10.1080/08941920.2016.1273418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knol, M. 2011. Mapping ocean governance: From ecological values to policy instrumentation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (7):979–95. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.547686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostershavets National Park. 2022. Säkerhet och regler (Security and rules). https://www.nationalparksofsweden.se/choose-park–-list/kosterhavet-national-park/visitor-information/safety-and-rules/
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., and P. Kumar. 2008. Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics 64 (4):808–19. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., and M. E. Lien. 2013. Slippery: Field notes in empirical ontology. Social Studies of Science 43 (3):363–78. doi:10.1177/0306312712456947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M., G. Bloom, A. Ely, P. Nightingale, I. Scoones, E. Shah, and A. Smith. 2007. Understanding governance: Pathways to sustainability. Brighton: STEPS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 1999. Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review 47 (1_suppl):74–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, K. 2012. Manipulating material hydro-worlds: Rethinking human and more-than-human relationality through offshore radio piracy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (5):1241–54. doi:10.1068/a44413.
   Google Scholar
• Pınarbaşı, K., I. Galparsoro, N. Alloncle, F. Quemmerais, and Á. Borja. 2020. Key issues for a transboundary and ecosystem-based maritime spatial planning in the Bay of Biscay. Marine Policy 120:104131. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 2002. Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Feminism-and-the-Mastery-of-Nature/Plumwood/p/book/9780415068109
   Google Scholar
• Report 1: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM). 2012. God havsmiljö 2020 – Del 1. https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.1690613b166605675de8cb6d/1539958533199/rapport-2012-19-god-havsmiljo-del-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Report 2: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM). 2012. God havsmiljö 2020 – Del 2. https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.2a9b232013c3e8ee03e3c17/1362737191111/rapport-2012-20-god-havsmiljo-del-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Report 3: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM). 2014. God havsmiljö 2020 – Del 3. https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.549ab516149e19df88fa7748/1418629887595/rapport-2014-20-god-havsmiljo-del-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Report 4: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM). 2015. God havsmiljö 2020 – Del 4. https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.45ea34fb151f3b238d8d1217/1452867739810/rapport-2015-30-atgardsprogram-for-havsmiljon.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Report 5: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM). 2016. Färdplan havsplanering. https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.6e7da7f9157b7c5f41478b3/1477991596993/fardplan-havsplaneringen-161010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Report 6: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM). 2015. Havsplanering – nulägesbeskrivning för 2014. https://www.havochvatten.se/data-kartor-och-rapporter/rapporter-och-andra-publikationer/publikationer/2015-03-13-havsplanering–-nulagesbeskrivning-for-2014.html.
   Google Scholar
• Report 7: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM). 2012. Tillämpning av ekosystemansatsen i havsplaneringen. https://www.havochvatten.se/data-kartor-och-rapporter/rapporter-och-andra-publikationer/publikationer/2012-12-07-tillampning-av-ekosystemansatsen-i-havsplaneringen.html
   Google Scholar
• Report 8: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM). 2019. Marine spatial plans for Gulf of Bothnia, Baltic Sea and Skagerrak/Kattegat (Ch 4, 12, 13). ttps://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.7d45de5c174e8f2dabec53f5/1602497688808/SwAM-MSP-proposals-chapters-4-12-13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Söderqvist, T., Soutukorva, Å., Moreno-Arancibia, P., Liungman, O., Ahrensberg, N., & Paulsson, L. (2012). Marine tourism and recreation in Sweden: A study for the Economic and Social Analysis of the Initial Assessment of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, T. B., M. Ruckelshaus, M. Swilling, E. H. Allison, H. Österblom, S. Gelcich, and P. Mbatha. 2020. A transition to sustainable ocean governance. Nature Communications 11 (1):1–14. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18409-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter, M., E. H. Zanden, A. P. Oudenhoven, R. P. Remme, H. M. Serna‐Chavez, R. S. Groot, and P. Opdam. 2014. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: A synthesis of critique and counter‐arguments. Conservation Letters 7 (6):514–23. doi:10.1111/conl.12091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvertown, J. 2015. Have ecosystem services been oversold? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30 (11):641–8. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P., and K. Peters. 2015. Wet ontologies, fluid spaces: Giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (2):247–64. doi:10.1068/d14148p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P. 2013. Of other seas: Metaphors and materialities in maritime regions. Atlantic Studies 10 (2):156–69. doi:10.1080/14788810.2013.785192.
   Google Scholar
• Tafon, R. V. 2018. Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (2):258–73. doi:10.1177/2399654417707527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transport styrelsen. 2022. Ban on the discharge of sewage from recreational craft. https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/en/shipping/Recreational-Boating/Ban-on-the-discharge-of-sewage-from-recreational-craft/
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. K. 2018. Solidarity beyond religious and secular: Multiple ontologies as an ethical framework in the politics of forced displacement. In B.J. Steele & E.A. Heinze (Eds.), Routledge handbook of ethics and international relations (1st ed.), 527–42. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725932
   Google Scholar