133
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Multiple Ontologies and Shared Terms of Debate in Southern Appalachian National Forest Planning

ORCID Icon
Pages 716-732 | Received 17 Apr 2022, Accepted 28 Mar 2023, Published online: 05 May 2023

References

  • Abrams, J. 2019. The emergence of network governance in US National Forest Administration: Causal factors and propositions for future research. Forest Policy and Economics 106:101977. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101977.
  • Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2007. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4):543–71. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
  • Blaser, M. 2010. Storytelling globalization from the Chaco and beyond. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Brugger, J., M. P. McClaran, and J. E. Sprinkle. 2020. Storytelling’ natural resource conflict on US public lands. Ethnos 85 (1):54–78. doi:10.1080/00141844.2018.1456476.
  • Carpenter, S. L., and W. J. D. Kennedy. 1988. Managing public disputes: A practical guide to handling conflict and reaching agreements. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass San.
  • Davis, D. E. 2011. Where there are mountains: An environmental history of the southern Appalachians. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  • de la Cadena, M., and M. Blaser. 2018. A world of many worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • DePuy, W., J. Weger, K. Foster, A. M. Bonanno, S. Kumar, K. Lear, R. Basilio, and L. German. 2021. Environmental governance: Broadening ontological spaces for a more livable world. Environment and Planning E 5 (2):947–75.
  • Descola, P. 2013. Beyond nature and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015. Collaborative governance regimes. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Farrell, J. 2015. The Battle for Yellowstone: Morality and the Sacred Roots of Environmental Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Harlan, W. 2017. Your 1 Million Acres. Blue Ridge Outdoors. August.
  • Igelman, J. 2020. Future of the Forests. WNC Magazine. Summer.
  • Jenkins, C. N., K. S. Van Houtan, S. L. Pimm, and J. O. Sexton. 2015. US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (16):5081–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1418034112.
  • Killingsworth, M. J., and J. S. Palmer. 2012. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Kosek, J. 2006. Understories: The political life of forests in northern New Mexico. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Law, J. 2015. What’s wrong with a one-world world? Distinktion 16 (1):126–39. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2015.1020066.
  • Lejano, R., M. Ingram, and H. Ingram. 2013. The power of narrative in environmental networks. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  • Mansfield, B., C. Biermann, K. McSweeney, J. Law, C. Gallemore, L. Horner, and D. K. Munroe. 2015. Environmental politics after nature: Conflicting socioecological futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2):284–93. doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.973802.
  • McCarthy, J. 2002. First World political ecology: Lessons from the Wise Use movement. Environment and Planning A 34 (7):1281–302. doi:10.1068/a3526.
  • Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Mol, A. 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Monroe, A. S., and W. H. Butler. 2016. Responding to a policy mandate to collaborate: Structuring collaboration in the collaborative forest landscape restoration program. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59 (6):1054–72. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1053562.
  • Nesbitt, J. T., and D. Weiner. 2001. Conflicting environmental imaginaries and the politics of nature in Central Appalachia. Geoforum 32 (3):333–49. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(00)00047-6.
  • Newfont, K. 2012. Blue Ridge commons: Environmental activism and forest history in western North Carolina, Environmental history and the American South. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  • Parkins, J. R., and R. E. Mitchell. 2005. Public participation as public debate: A deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 18 (6):529–40. doi:10.1080/08941920590947977.
  • Runk, J. V. 2009. Social and river networks for the trees: Wounaan’s riverine rhizomic cosmos and arboreal conservation. American Anthropologist 111 (4):456–67. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01155.x.
  • U.S. Forest Service (USFS). 2012a. Forest Service Kicks Off Revision of Nantahala-Pisgah Management Plan. https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/nfsnc/news-events/?cid=STELPRDB5400134
  • U.S. Forest Service (USFS). 2012b. Rule. National Forest System Land Management Planning. Federal Register 77:21161–276.
  • U.S. Forest Service (USFS). 2014. Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests Assessment. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service Southern Region.
  • Watts, V. 2013. Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization 2 (1):20–34.
  • Wilson, N. J., and J. Inkster. 2018. Respecting water: Indigenous water governance, ontologies, and the politics of kinship on the ground. Environment and Planning E 1 (4):516–38. doi:10.1177/2514848618789378.
  • Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2022. The bricks and mortar of collaborative ecosystem-based restoration and management. Journal of Great Lakes Research 48 (6):1320–8. doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2022.06.009.
  • Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.