Conflicting Notions of Land in Indonesia

References

• Århem, K., and G. Sprenger. 2016. Animism in Southeast Asia. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. 2013. The triumph of capital? Class politics and Indonesian democratisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43 (2):226–42. doi:10.1080/00472336.2012.757432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, B.,. C. Dittrich, and S. Adiwibowo. 2014. Contested land: An analysis of multi-layered conflicts in Jambi province, Sumatra, Indonesia. ASEAS–Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 7 (1):75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Bessire, L., and D. Bond. 2014. Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist 41 (3):440–56. doi:10.1111/amet.12083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser, M. 2013. Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe. Towards a conversation on political ontology. Current Anthropology 54 (5):547–68. doi:10.1086/672270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser, M. 2009a. Political ontology. Cultural Studies 23 (5–6):873–96. doi:10.1080/09502380903208023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser, M. 2009b. The threat of the Yrmo. The political ontology of a sustainable hunting program. American Anthropologist 111 (1):10–20. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01073.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser, M., and M. de la Cadena. 2018. A world of many worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaser, M., and A. Escobar. 2016. Political ecology. In Keywords in the study of environment and culture, eds. J. Adamson, W. A. Gleason, and D. N. Pellow, 164–7. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S., M. Hall, R. I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2):209–16. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.559005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burow, P. B., S. Brock, and M. R. Dove. 2018. Unsettling the land. Indigeneity, ontology, and hybridity in settler colonialism. Environment and Society 9 (1):57–74. doi:10.3167/ares.2018.090105.
   Google Scholar
• Bräuchler, B. 2023. Ecological disturbances: Negotiating indigeneity and access to land in Indonesia. In Plural Ecologies in Southeast Asia: Hierarchies, conflicts, and coexistence, eds. T. Duile, K. Großmann, M. Haug, and G. Sprenger. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conde, M., and P. Le Billon. 2017. Why do some communities resist mining projects while others do not? The Extractive Industries and Society 4 (3):681–97. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2017.04.009.
   Google Scholar
• Cons, J., and M. Eilenberg. 2019. Frontier assemblages. The emergent politics of resource frontiers in Asia. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cornot-Gandolphe, S. 2017. Indonesia’s electricity demand and the coal sector. Export or meet domestic demand? Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, M. 2015. Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devi, B., and D. Prayogo. 2013. Mining and development in Indonesia. An overview of the regulatory framework and policies. Perth: International Mining for Development Centre, University of Western Australia
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. 2013. Beyond nature and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dove, M. 2011. The banana tree at the gate. A history of marginal peoples and global markets in Borneo. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duile, T., K. Großmann, M. Haug, and G. Sprenger. 2023. Plural ecologies in Southeast Asia: Hierarchies, conflicts, and coexistence. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the pluriverse. Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke.
   Google Scholar
• Eitel, K., and M. Meurer. 2021. Introduction. Exploring multifarious worlds and the political. Within the ontological turn(s). Berliner Blätter 84:3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gönner, C. 2001. Muster und Strategien der Ressourcennutzung: Eine Fallstudie aus einem Dayak Benuaq Dorf in Ost Kalimantan, Indonesien. Zürich: ETH Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Großmann, K. 2021. Human–environment relations and politics in Indonesia. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Großmann, K., and A. Gullo. 2022. Mining and masculinity in Indonesia. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 23 (2):185–200. doi:10.1080/14442213.2021.2019824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., P. Hirsch, and T. M. Li. 2011. Powers of exclusion. Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press
   Google Scholar
• Haug, M. 2023. Home of spirits and loggers: Plural perspectives on the forest in Indonesian Borneo. In Plural ecologies in Southeast Asia: Hierarchies, conflicts, and coexistence, ed. T. Duile, K. Großmann, M. Haug, and G. Sprenger. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, M., M. Rössler, and A.-T. Grumblies. 2017. Introduction: Contesting and reformulating centre periphery relations in Indonesia. In Rethinking power relations in Indonesia: Transforming the margins, eds. M. Haug, M. Rössler, and A.-T. Grumblies, 1–25. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, J., H. Faust, Y. Kunz, and R. Mardiana. 2018. The transnationalisation of competing state projects: carbon offsetting and development in Sumatra’s coastal peat swamps. Antipode 50 (4):953–75. doi:10.1111/anti.12381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, J., and H. Faust. 2014. Conservation, REDD + and the struggle for land in Jambi, Indonesia. Pacific Geographies 41:20–5.
   Google Scholar
• Holbraad, M., and M. A. Pedersen. 2017. The ontological turn: An anthropological exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2011. The perception of the environment. Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B. 2021. Practical ontologies redux. Berliner Blätter 84:93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. 2015. Anthropology of ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology 44 (1):311–27. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F. 2015. Unearthing conflict: Corporate mining, activism, and expertise in Peru. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M. T. 2014. What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39 (4):589–602. doi:10.1111/tran.12065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P. M. 2018. The anthropology of human-environment relations: Materialism with and without Marxism. Focaal 2018 (82):64–79. doi:10.3167/fcl.2018.820105.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. and K. Robinson, eds. 2016. Land and development in Indonesia. Searching for people’s sovereignty. Singapore: ISEAS.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., J. A. C. Vel, and S. Afiff. 2012. Trajectories of land acquisition and enclosure: development schemes, virtual land grabs, and green acquisitions in Indonesia’s Outer Islands. Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2):521–49. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevins, J., and N. L. Peluso. 2008. Introduction: Commoditization in Southeast Asia. In Taking Southeast Asia to market: Commodities, nature, and people in the neoliberal age, eds., J. Nevins and N.L. Peluso, 1–24. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, Y., S. J. Lansing, and M. R. Dove. 2015. Environmental anthropology: Systematic perspectives. Annual Review of Anthropology 44 (1):153–68. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014159.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L., and C. Lund. 2011. New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4):667–81. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichler, M., and A. Brad. 2016. Political ecology and socio-ecological conflicts in Southeast Asia. ASEAS–Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 9 (1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1972. Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review 66 (1):91–113. doi:10.2307/1959280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenger, G., K. Großmann, M. Haug, and T. Duile. 2023. Plural ecologies: Beyond ontology and political ecology in Southeast Asia. In Plural Ecologies in Southeast Asia: Hierarchies, conflicts, and coexistence, eds., T. Duile, K. Großmann, M. Haug, and G. Sprenger. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• viveiros de Castro, E. 2004. Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Tipiti: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2 (1):3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3):469–88. doi:10.2307/3034157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M. 2000. Political ecology. In A companion to economic geography, eds. T. Barnes and E. Sheppard, 257–75. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar