What Is at Stake? The Ontological Dimension of Environmental Conflicts

References

• Amador-Jimenez, M., and N. Millner. 2023. Being Paramuno: Peasant world-making practices in the paramos [high moorlands] of the Colombian Andes. Society & Natural Resources :1–19. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2258346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwood, S. B., N. P. C. B. M. Bruised Head, M. W. Brunson, A. S. O. B. L. First Rider, T. Frandy, J. Maffie, A. T. M. V. M. Provost, M. B. C. P. Weasel Moccasin, and Itsiipootsikimskai. 2023. Níksókowaawák as axiom: The indispensability of comprehensive relational animacy in blackfoot ways of knowing, being, and doing. Society & Natural Resources :1–22. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2180696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaney, D. L., and A. B. Tickner. 2017. Worlding, ontological politics and the possibility of a decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 45 (3):293–311. doi: 10.1177/0305829817702446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser, M. 2009. Political ontology: Cultural studies without ‘cultures’? Cultural Studies 23 (5-6):873–96. doi: 10.1080/09502380903208023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser, M. 2013a. Notes towards a political ontology of ‘environmental’ conflicts. In Contested ecologies: Dialogues in the south on nature and knowledge, ed. L. Green, 13–27. Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaser, M. 2013b. Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe. Current Anthropology 54 (5):547–68. doi: 10.1086/672270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser, M., and M. de la Cadena. 2018. Introduction. Pluriverse. Proposals for a world of many worlds. In A World of Many Worlds, ed. M. de la Cadena and M. Blaser, 1–22. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boucquey, N., L. Fairbanks, K. S. Martin, L. M. Campbell, and B. McCay. 2016. The ontological politics of marine spatial planning: Assembling the ocean and shaping the capacities of ‘community’ and ‘environment. Geoforum 75:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, V. 2023. Analysis of ocean ontologies in three frameworks: A study of law of the sea discourse. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 6 (2):1138–63. doi: 10.1177/25148486221110436.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., and L. Gurney. 2020. Mapping and navigating ontologies in water governance: The case of the Ganges. Water International 45 (7-8):847–64. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2020.1812268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, O. B., S. West, K. Degnian, M. Djarrbal, E. Ignjic, C. Ramandjarri, G. W. Malibirr, M. Guwankil, P. Djigirr, F. Biridjala, et al. 2023. Balpara: A practical approach to working with ontological difference in indigenous land & sea management. Society & Natural Resources :1–21. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2199690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. S. 2004. Ontological politics: Mapping a complex environmental problem. Environmental Values 13 (4):497–522. doi: 10.3197/0963271042772587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves, K. A., and S. Weißermel. 2023. The cosmopolitics of resistance: The Belo Monte Dam and the struggle of riverine communities. Society & Natural Resources :1–17. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2199689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletta, M., and M. Raftopoulos. 2016. Whose natures? Whose knowledges? An introduction to epistemic politics and eco-ontologies in Latin America. In Provincialising nature: Multidisciplinary approaches to the politics of the environment in Latin America, ed. M. Coletta and M. Raftopoulos, 1–18. London, UK: University of London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collard, R. C., L. M. Harris, N. Heynen, and L. Mehta. 2018. The antinomies of nature and space. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1 (1-2):3–24. doi: 10.1177/2514848618777162.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, M. 2015. Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture. Translated by Janet Lloyd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. (2014). Modes of Being and Forms of Predication. HAU: Journal of Anthropological Theory 4 (1): 271-280. doi:10.14318/hau4.1.012.
   Google Scholar
• Eitel, K., and M. Meurer. 2021. Introduction: Exploring multifarious worlds and the political within the ontological turn(s). Berliner Blätter 84:3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Erdman Vigh, H., and D. Brehm Sausdal. 2014. From essence back to existence: Anthropology beyond the ontological turn. Anthropological Theory 14 (1):49–73. doi: 10.1177/1463499614524401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2011. Sustainability: Design for the pluriverse. Development 54 (2):137–40. doi: 10.1057/dev.2011.28.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2015. Territorios de diferencia: La onotología política de los ‘derechos al territorio’. Cuadernos de Antropología Social 41:25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2020. Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Latin America in translation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelves-Gomez, F., J. Carter, R. Beilin, and S. Brincat. 2023. “Ordering the wild”: How adaptive management is used to maintain nature like a postcard. Society & Natural Resources :1–18. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2172241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. J., M. D. Turner, and M. Daly. 2018. A critical political ecology of human dimensions of climate change: Epistemology, ontology, and ethics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 9 (4):e526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Großmann, K. 2023. Conflicting notions of land in Indonesia. Society & Natural Resources :1–16. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2223540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallemeier, J. 2023. Multiple ontologies and shared terms of debate in southern Appalachian national forest planning. Society & Natural Resources :1–17. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2204296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, J., and J. Thomsen. 2023. Contested estuary ontologies: The conflict over the fairway adaptation of the Elbe River, Germany. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 6 (1):153–77. doi: 10.1177/25148486221098825.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, S. 2007. Geographies of nature: Societies, environments, ecologies. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holbraad, Martin, Morten A. Pedersen and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. 2014. The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions. Accessed 02 April 2024. http://culanth.org/field-sights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropologicalposition
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. 2018. Nature, critique, ontology, and decolonial options: Problematising ‘the political’. In The SAGE handbook of nature, ed. T. Marsden, 235–64. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Joronen, M., and J. Häkli. 2017. Politicizing ontology. Progress in Human Geography 41 (5):561–79. doi: 10.1177/0309132516652953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. 2013. How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, Y., J. Hein, and M. Sobirin. 2023. Beyond protection, toward respect: Struggle for environmental justice in the Kendeng mountains. Society & Natural Resources :1–19. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2267497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila, M. M. 2023. An irreplaceable place: Onto-epistemological contestation in the environmental impact assessment process of the Green Anglo American Sakatti Mine, Arctic Finland. Society & Natural Resources :1–21. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2166182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M., I. Scoones, and B. Wynne. 2005. Introduction: Science, citizenship and globalization. In Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement, ed. M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne, 3–14. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lepoša, N., and P. Knutsson. 2022. Framing matters for ontological politics of the ocean: Contrasting European Union policy framings with recreationists’ alternative experiences of a living sea world. Society & Natural Resources :1–17. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2022.2065710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J. 2002. The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 1999. Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review 47 (1_suppl):74–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nadasdy, P. 2021. How many worlds are there? American Ethnologist 48 (4):357–69. doi: 10.1111/amet.13046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa, J., and J. García Labrador. 2020. Two ontologies of territory and a legal claim in the Ecuadorian Upper Amazon. Journal of Political Ecology 27 (1):496–516. doi: 10.2458/v27i1.23099.
   Google Scholar
• Oslender, U. 2021. Decolonizing cartography and ontological conflict: Counter-mapping in colombia and “cartographies otherwise.” Political Geography 89:102444. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querejazu, A., and A. B. Tickner. 2020. The rights of mother earth. A pluriversal reading of climate change governance. In Postcolonial governmentalities: Rationalities, violences and contestations, ed. T. Terri-Anne and E. Wynne-Hughes, 217–37. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. L. B. 2016. The affects of water – The materialized morality of wells, pipes, and pumps in Tarawa, Kiribati. Society & Natural Resources 29 (6):668–80. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1107791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmond, A. 2014. Tears of Rangi: Water, power, and people in New Zealand. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (3):285–309. doi: 10.14318/hau4.3.017.
   Google Scholar
• Sempértegui, A., and M. Báez. 2023. Ontological conflicts in the plurinational state: The case of indigenous resistance against the mirador mega-mining project in Ecuador. Society & Natural Resources :1–18. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2228241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner, A. B., and A. Querejazu. 2021. Weaving worlds: Cosmopraxis as relational sensibility. International Studies Review 23 (2):391–408. doi: 10.1093/isr/viaa100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ureta, S., T. Lekan, and W. G. von Hardenberg. 2020. Baselining nature: An introduction. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3 (1):3–19. doi: 10.1177/2514848619898092.
   Google Scholar
• Vélez Triana, J. S. 2023. Political ontologies of Colombian Amazonia: Peasant resistance in protected areas. Society & Natural Resources 36 (10):1200–16. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2201811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. J., and J. Inkster. 2018. Respecting water: Indigenous water governance, ontologies, and the politics of kinship on the ground. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1 (4):516–38. doi: 10.1177/2514848618789378.
   Google Scholar
• Yaka, Ö. 2023. More-than-human lifeworlds: Ethics, ontology and relationality in local environmental struggles. Society & Natural Resources :1–17. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2238230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, A. M. 2021. Transforming geographies: Performing indigenous-Māori ontologies and ethics of more-than-human care in an era of ecological emergency. New Zealand Geographer 77 (2):101–13. doi: 10.1111/nzg.12302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar