Exposure study to examine chemosensory effects of ɛ-caprolactam in healthy men and women

References

• AgBB, Ausschuss zur gesundheitlichen Bewertung von Bauprodukten. (2015). Aktualisierte NIK-Werte-Liste 2015; In: Bewertungsschema für VOC aus Bauprodukten. Ausschuss zur gesundheitlichen Bewertung von Bauprodukten (AgBB) des Umweltbundesamt (UBA); [Online]. Available from: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/355/dokumente/agbb-bewertungsschema_2015_2.pdf. [Last accessed: 16 Aug 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Becker W, Naumann HH, Pfaltz CR. (1989). Untersuchung der Luftdurchgängigkeit der Nase. In: Becker W, Naumann HH, Pfaltz CR, (eds.) Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag
   Google Scholar
• Brüning T, Bartsch R, Bolt HM, et al. (2014). Sensory irritation as a basis for setting occupational exposure limits. Arch Toxicol 88:1855–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCLRU Grading Scale. (2011). Brian Holden Vision Institute (http://www.brienholdenvision.org) Grading Scales (Grading of bulbar redness); [Online] Available from: http://www.contactlensupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Grading_Scales_web.pdf. [Last accessed: 16 Aug 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Clement PA, Gordts F. (2005). Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 43:169–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2015). List of substances. In: List of MAK, BAT Values 2015, (eds). Permanent senate commission for the investigation of health hazards of chemical compounds in the work area (MAK Commission) within the DFG. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, S. 43
   Google Scholar
• Dick RB, Ahlers H. (1998). Chemicals in the workplace: incorporating human neurobehavioral testing into the regulatory process. Am J Ind Med 33:439–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECA, European Collaborative Action - Urban Air, Indoor Environment and Human Exposure. (2013). Harmonization framework for health based evaluation of indoor emissions from construction products in the European Union using the EU-LCI concept (Report No 29; EUR 26168 EN); European Commission, Joint Research Center, Institute for Health & Consumer Protection (ICHP); [Online] Available from: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC83683. [Last accessed: 16 Aug 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Edling C, Lundberg P. (2000). The significance of neurobehavioral tests for occupational exposure limits: an example from Sweden. Neurotoxicology 21:653–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson WS, Wheeler DD. (1973). Caprolactam vapor exposures. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 34:384–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greim H. (1990). ɛ-Caprolactam [MAK Value Documentation in German language, 1990]. The MAK Collection for Occupational Health and Safety. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.KGaA, 1–8. [Online] Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/3527600418.mb10560d _sd0016/full. [Last accessed: 16 Aug 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Henschler D. (1975). ɛ-Caprolactam [MAK Value Documentation in German language, 1975]. The MAK Collection for Occupational Health and Safety. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.KGaA. [Online] Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/3527600418.mb10560d_sd0004/pdf. [Last accessed: 16 Aug 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A. (2007). Normative data for the “Sniffin' Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:237–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, et al. (1997). 'Sniffin' sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22:39–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihrig A, Hoffmann J, Triebig G. (2006). Examination of the influence of personal traits and habituation on the reporting of complaints at experimental exposure to ammonia. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79:332–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iregren A, Gamberale F, Kjellberg A. (1996). SPES: a psychological test system to diagnose environmental hazards. Swedish performance evaluation system. Neurotoxicol Teratol 18:485–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson G, Nihlen A, Lof A. (1995). Toxicokinetics and acute effects of MTBE and ETBE in male volunteers. Toxicol Lett 82:713–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesswetter E, Thriel C, Schaper M, et al. (2005). Eye blinks as indicator for sensory irritation during constant and peak exposures to 2-ethylhexanol. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 19:531–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, et al. (1996). “Sniffin' sticks”: screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 34:222–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krohne HW, Egloff B, Kohlmann CW, Tausch A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “positive and negative affect schedule” (PANAS). Diagnostica 42:139–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang I, Bruckner T, Triebig G. (2008). Formaldehyde and chemosensory irritation in humans: a controlled human exposure study. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 50:23–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller JU, Bruckner T, Triebig G. (2013). Exposure study to examine chemosensory effects of formaldehyde on hyposensitive and hypersensitive males. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86:107–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann HH. (1990). Nase, Nasennebenhöhlen und Nasenrachen. In: Naumann HH, Scherer H, (eds). Differentialdiagnostik in der Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag
   Google Scholar
• Nihlen A, Walinder R, Lof A, Johanson G. (1998). Experimental exposure to methyl tertiary-butyl ether. II. Acute effects in humans. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 148:281–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norback D, Wieslander G. (2002). Biomarkers and chemosensory irritations. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:298–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSHA. (1988). Occupational Safety & Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor; ε-Caprolactam Sampling and Analytical Method; Method number PV2012. [Online] Available from: https://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/partial/pv2012/2012.html [Last accessed: 16 Aug 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Raulf-Heimsoth M, Hoffmeyer F, van Thriel C, et al. (2010). Assessment of low dose effects of acute sulphur dioxide exposure on the airways using non-invasive methods. Arch Toxicol 84:121–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raulf-Heimsoth M, Pesch B, Kendzia B, et al. (2011). Irritative effects of vapors and aerosols of bitumen on the airways assessed by noninvasive methods. Arch Toxicol 85:41–52. S
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raulf-Heimsoth M, Wirtz C, Papenfuss F, Baur X. (2000). Nasal lavage mediator profile and cellular composition of nasal brushing material during latex challenge tests. Clin Exp Allergy 30:110–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhold RW, Hoffman GM, Bolte HF, et al. (1998). Subchronic inhalation toxicity study of caprolactam (with a 4-week recovery) in the rat via whole-body exposures. Toxicol Sci 44:197–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber A, Demes P, Golka K, et al. (2000). Subjective symptoms due to solvent mixtures, dioxin, and toluene: impact of exposure versus personality factors. Neurotoxicology 21:677–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber A, van Thriel C, Haumann K, et al. (2002). Psychological reactions related to chemosensory irritation. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:314–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubota K, Hata S, Okusawa Y, et al. (1996). Quantitative videographic analysis of blinking in normal subjects and patients with dry eye. Arch Ophthalmol 114:715–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Thriel C, Schaper M, Kiesswetter E, et al. (2006). From chemosensory thresholds to whole body exposures-experimental approaches evaluating chemosensory effects of chemicals. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79:308–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS. (2004). Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1434–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkoff P, Nojgaard JK, Troiano P, Piccoli B. (2005). Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency. Occup Environ Med 62:4–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler AE, Zimmer H, Triebig G. (2008). Exposure study on chemosensory effects of epsilon-caprolactam in the low concentration range. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81:743–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar