Anticipated Ethics and Regulatory Challenges in PCORnet: The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network

References

• ACA. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. (2010). Public Law 3590, Title IV, x4207, USC HR.
   Google Scholar
• American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. (ARRA). (2009). Public Law 111–5.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. and Saghai, Y. (2012). The historical foundations of the research-practice distinction in bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 33(1): 45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium, Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement. (2011). Principles of Community Engagement. Second edition. Bethesda, Maryland: US National Institutes of Health, Available at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE_Report_508_FINAL.pdf. Last Accessed March 30, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. (CTTI). Recommendations: Use of central IRBs for multicenter clinical trials. Available at http://www.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/what-we-do/study-start/central-irb. Last accessed December 26, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations. (2004). Title 21: Food and Drugs, Part 50: Protection of Human Subjects. 21 CFR 50.
   Google Scholar
• Common Rule. (1991). General Requirements for Informed Consent. 45 CFR 46.116.
   Google Scholar
• Consent 2.0: A better way of signing up for studies of your genes. (2012). The Economist. April 28, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, L. H., Brown, J., and Platt, R. (2014). Four health data networks illustrate the potential for a shared national multipurpose big-data network. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 33(7): 1178–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damschroder, L. J., Pritts, J. L., Neblo, M. A., Kalarickal, R. J., Creswell, J. W., and Hayward, R. A. (2007). Patients, privacy and trust: Patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. Social Science and Medicine, 64(1): 223–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Can electronic signature be used to document consent. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/faq/informed-consent/can-electronic-signature-be-used-to-document-consent.html. Last accessed December 26, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Faden, R. R., Beauchamp, T. L., and Kass, N. E. (2014). Informed consent, comparative effectiveness, and learning health care. N. Engl. J. Med., 340: 766–768.
   Google Scholar
• Faden, R. R., Beauchamp, T. L., and Kass, N. E. (2011). Learning health care systems and justice. Hastings Center Report, 41(4): 3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faden, R. R., Kass, N. E., Goodman, S. N., Pronovost, P., Tunis, S., and Beauchamp, T. L. (2013). An ethics framework for a learning health care system: A departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Center Report, 43(s1): S16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Faden, R. R., Kass, N. E., Whicher, D., Stewart, W., and Tunis, S. (2013). Ethics and informed consent for comparative effectiveness research with prospective electronic clinical data. Medical Care, 51(8 Suppl 3): S53–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleurence, R. L., Beal, A. C., Sheridan, S. E., Johnson, L. B., and Selby, J. V. (2014). Patient-powered research networks aim to improve patient care and health research. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 33(7): 1212–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, S. and Wertheimer. A. (2014). Determining minimal risk for comparative effectiveness research. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 36(3): 16–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. (UNAIDS). (2011). Good Participatory Practice Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials. Second edition, Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS/AVAC.
   Google Scholar
• Kass, N. E., Faden, R. R., Goodman, S. N., Pronovost, P., Tunis, S., and Beauchamp, T. L. (2013). The research‐treatment distinction: A problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight. Hastings Center Report, 43: S4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. K., McGraw, D., Mamo, L., and Ohno-Machado, L. (2013). Development of a privacy and security policy framework for a multistate comparative effectiveness research network. Medical Care, 51(8 Suppl 3): S66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y. H. and Miller, F. G. (2014). Informed consent for pragmatic trials—The integrated consent model. N. Engl. J. Med., 370(8): 769–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J. and Schur, C. (2010). Balancing access to health data and privacy: A review of the issues and approaches for the future. Health Services Research, 45(5p2): 1456–1467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, E. B. (2013). Building trust in the power of “big data” research to serve the public good. JAMA, 309(23): 2443–2444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui, K., Lie, R. K., Turin, T. C., and Kita, Y. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: Is longer better? J. Epidemiol., 22(4): 308–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazor, K. M., Sabin, J. E., Goff, S. L., Smith, D. H., Rolnick, S., Roblin, D., Raebel, M. A., Herrinton, L. J., Gurwitz, J. H., and Boudreau, D. (2009). Cluster randomized trials to study the comparative effectiveness of therapeutics: Stakeholders’ concerns and recommendations. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 18(7): 554–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, K., Willison, D., Holbrook, A., and Keshavjee, K. (2004). Patients’ consent preferences regarding the use of their health information for research purposes: A qualitative study. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 9(1): 22–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. (NIH). (2014). Draft NIH Policy on the Use of a Single Institutional Review Board for Multi-Site Research, December 3, 2014. Available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-026.html. Last accessed March 30, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory. (2014). Available at https://www.nihcollaboratory.org/Pages/default.aspx. Last accessed December 26, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, L., Aisner, D., and McGinnis, J. M. (2007). Institute of medicine roundtable on evidence-based medicine: The learning healthcare system (workshop summary). Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US).
   Google Scholar
• PCORI. (2014). Limited PCORI funding announcement: Optimal maintenance aspirin dose for patients with coronary artery disease, October 27, 2014. Available at http://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/PCORI-PFA-2015-Winter-Aspirin.pdf. Last accessed March 30, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• PCORnet Data Privacy Task Force. Available at http://www.pcornet.org/task-forces/data-privacy/. Last accessed December 26, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• PCORnet. The national patient-centered clinical research network. Available at http://www.pcornet.org/. Last accessed December 4, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, R., Kass, N. E., and McGraw, D. (2014). Ethics, regulation, and comparative effectiveness research: Time for a change. JAMA 311(15): 1497–1498.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, R., Takvorian, S. U., Septimus, E., Hickok, J., Moody, J., Perlin, J., Jernigan, J. A, Kleinman, K., and Huang, S. S. (2010). Cluster randomized trials in comparative effectiveness research: Randomizing hospitals to test methods for prevention of healthcare-associated infections. Medical Care, 48 (6 Suppl): S52–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rethinking clinical trials: A living textbook of pragmatic clinical trials. (2014). Available at http://sites.duke.edu/rethinkingclinicaltrials/. Last accessed March 30, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rid, A. (2014). How should we regulate risk in biomedical research? An ethical analysis of recent policy proposals and initiatives. Health Policy 117(3): 409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Schellings, R., Kessels, A. G., ter Riet, G., Sturmans, F., Widdershoven, G. A., and Knottnerus, J. A. (2009). Indications and requirements for the use of prerandomization. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(4): 393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selby, J. V., Beal, A. C., and Frank, L. (2012). The patient-centered outcomes research institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA, 307(15): 1583–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selker, H. P., Strom, B. L., Ford, D. E., Meltzer, D. O., Pauker, S. G., Pincus, H. A., Rich, E. C., Tompkins, C., and Whitlock, E. P. (2010). White paper on CTSA consortium role in facilitating comparative effectiveness research. Clinical and Translational Science, 3(1): 29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solove, D. J. ( June 30, 2014). Facebook’s psych experiment: Consent, privacy, and manipulation. Huffington Post, June 30, 2014, sec Tech.
   Google Scholar
• Steering Committee meeting: Report on ethics supplements, February 24-25. (2014). Available at https://www.nihcollaboratory.org/news/Pages/February2014_Steering-Committee_meeting.aspx. Last accessed December 26, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Stunkel, L., Benson, M., McLellan, L., Sinaii, N., Bedarida, G., Emanuel, E., and Grady, C. (2010). Comprehension and informed consent: Assessing the effect of a short consent form. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 32(4): 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugarman, J. and Califf, R. M. (2014). Ethics and regulatory complexities for pragmatic clinical trials. JAMA 311(23): 2381–2382.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, N. S., Crowley Jr, W. F., Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L. Sherwood, L. M., Johnson, S. B., Catanese, V., Tilson, H., and Getz, K. (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. Jama, 289(10): 1278–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/. Last accessed December 25, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Weijer, C., Grimshaw, J. M., Eccles, M. P., McRae, A. D., White, A., Brehaut, J. C., Taljaard, M., and Althabe, F. (2012). The Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials. PLoS Medicine, 9(11): e1001346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar