Population-response model for vibrotactile spatial summation

References

• Bell J, Bolanowski S, Holmes MH. The structure and function of Pacinian corpuscles: A review. Prog Neurobiol 1994; 42: 79–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum ZW. Numerical tabulation of the distribution of Kolmogorov's statistic for finite sample size. J Am Statist Assoc 1952; 47: 425–441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolanowski SJ. Information processing channels in the sense of touch. Wenner–Gren International Series: Somesthesis and the neurobiology of the somatosensory cortex, O Franzen, R Johansson, L Tarenius. Birkhäuser, Basel 1996; 49–58
   Google Scholar
• Bolanowski SJ, Gescheider GA, Verrillo RT, Checkosky CM. Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 1680–1694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolanowski SJ, Pawson L, Verrillo R. Tactile receptor responses to vibratory stimuli placed on and around their receptive-field. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1999; 25: 407
   Google Scholar
• Bolanowski Jr SJ, Zwislocki JJ. Intensity and frequency characteristics of Pacinian corpuscles I. Action potentials. J Neurophysiol 1984a; 51: 793–811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolanowski Jr SJ, Zwislocki JJ. Intensity and frequency characteristics of Pacinian corpuscles. II. Receptor potentials. J Neurophysiol 1984b; 51: 812–830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkosky CM, Bolanowski SJ. Effects of stimulus duration on the response properties of Pacinian corpuscles: Implications for the neural code. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 3372–3380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkosky CM, Bolanowski SJ. The effect of stimulus duration on frequency-response functions in the Pacinian (P) channel. Somatosens Mot Res 1994; 11: 47–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman GT, Bahramali H, Zhang HQ, Rowe MJ. Characterization of tactile afferent fibers in the hand of the marmoset monkey. J Neurophysiol 2001; 85: 1793–1804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JC. Attenuation of vibrotactile spatial summation. Sens Proc 1976; 1: 40–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrington DG, Rowe MJ, Tarvin RP. Actions of single sensory fibres on cat dorsal column nuclei neurones: Vibratory signalling in a one-to-one linkage. J Physiol (Lond) 1987; 386: 293–309
   Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA, Berryhill ME, Verrillo RT, Bolanowski SJ. Vibrotactile temporal summation: Probability summation or neural integration? Somatosens Mot Res 1999; 16: 229–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA, Bolanowski SJ, Güçlü B, Sexton JL, Karalunas S, Fontana A. Spatial summation in the tactile sensory system: Probability summation and neural integration 2005, Somatosens Mot Res in press
   Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA, Bolanowski SJ, Pope JV, Verrillo RT. A four-channel analysis of the tactile sensitivity of the fingertip: Frequency selectivity, spatial summation, and temporal summation. Somatosens Mot Res 2002; 19: 114–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA, Sklar BF, Van Doren CL, Verrillo RT. vibrotactile forward masking: Psychophysical evidence for a triplex theory of cutaneous mechanoreception. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 534–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin AW, John KT, Sathian K, Darian-Smith I. Spatial and temporal factors determining afferent fiber responses to a grating moving sinusoidally over the monkey's fingerpad. J Neurosci 1989; 9: 1280–1293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenspan JD, Bolanowski SJ. The psychophysics of tactile perception and its peripheral physiological basis. Handbook of perception and cognition, L Kruger. Academic Press, Pain and touch, San Diego 1996; 7: 25–103
   Google Scholar
• Güçlü B, Bolanowski SJ. Modeling population responses of rapidly-adapting mechanoreceptive fibers. J Comput Neurosci 2002; 12: 201–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlü B, Bolanowski SJ. Distribution of the intensity-characteristic parameters of cat rapidly-adapting mechanoreceptive fibers. Somatosens Mot Res 2003a; 20: 149–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlü B, Bolanowski SJ. Frequency responses of cat rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive fibers. Somatosens Mot Res 2003b; 20: 249–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlü; B, Bolanowski; SJ. Probability of stimulus detection in a model population of rapidly adapting fibers. Neural Comput 2004; 16: 39–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlü B, Bolanowski SJ. Vibrotactile thresholds of the Non-Pacinian I channel: II. Predicting the effects of contactor location on the phalanx. Somatosens Mot Res 2005; 2: 57–68
   Google Scholar
• Hallin RG, Wu G. Novel information on peripheral tactile mechanisms in man acquired with concentric needle electrode microneurography. Behav Brain Res 2002; 135: 11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel H, Boman KKA. Afferent impulses in cutaneous sensory nerves in human subjects. J Neurophysiol 1960; 23: 564–578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iggo A, Ogawa H. Correlative physiological and morphological studies of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in cat's glabrous skin. J Physiol (Lond) 1977; 266: 275–296
   Google Scholar
• Ilyinsky OB. Processes of excitation and inhibition in single mechanoreceptors (Pacinian corpuscles). Nature 1965; 208: 351–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvilehto T. Neural basis of cutaneous sensations analyzed by microelectrode measurements from human peripheral nerves – A review. Scand J Psychol 1977; 18: 348–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson RS, Landström U, Lundström R. Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements. Brain Res 1982; 244: 17–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: Relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol (Lond) 1979; 286: 283–300
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KO. Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 1974; 37: 48–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KO. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 455–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knibestöl M, Vallbo ÅB. Single unit analysis of mechanoreceptor activity from the human glabrous skin. Acta Physiol Scand 1970; 80: 178–195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamoré PJJ, Keemink CJ. Evidence for different types of mechanoreceptors from measurements of the psychophysical threshold for vibrations under different stimulation conditions. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 2339–2351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leem JW, Willis WD, Chung JM. Cutaneous sensory receptors in the rat foot. J Neurophysiol 1993; 69: 1684–1699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom U, Lund L. The discharge from vibration-sensitive receptors in the monkey foot. Exp Neurol 1966; 15: 401–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein WR, Rathkamp R. The sites for mechano-electric conversion in a Pacinian corpuscle. J Gen Physiol 1958; 41: 1245–1265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looft FJ. Response of monkey glabrous skin mechanoreceptors to random noise sequences: II. Dynamic stimulus state analysis. Somatosens Mot Res 1996; 13: 11–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manahilov V, Sımpson WA, McCulloch DL. Spatial summation of peripheral Gabor patches. J Opt Soc Am A 2001; 18: 273–282
   Google Scholar
• Massey Jr FJ. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Statist Assoc 1951; 46: 68–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer PL. Introductory probability and statistical applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1965
   Google Scholar
• Miller LH. Table of percentage points of Kolmogorov statistics. J Amer Statist Assoc 1956; 51: 111–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountcastle VB, LaMotte RH, Carli G. Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: Comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand. J Neurophysiol 1972; 35: 122–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa J, Torebjörk E. Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand. J Physiol (Lond) 1983; 342: 633–654
   Google Scholar
• Rowe MJ. Synaptic transmission between single tactile and kinaesthetic sensory nerve fibers and their central target neurones. Behav Brain Res 2002; 135: 197–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato M. Response of Pacinian corpuscles to sinusoidal vibration. J Physiol-London 1961; 159: 391–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrick Jr CE. Variables affecting sensitivity of the human skin to mechanical vibration. J Exp Psychol 1953; 45: 273–282
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talbot WH, Darian-Smith I, Kornhuber HH, Mountcastle VB. The sense of flutter-vibration: Comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J Neurophysiol 1968; 31: 301–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallbo ÅB, Olsson KÅ, Westberg K-G, Clark FJ. Microstimulation of single tactile afferents from the human hand: Sensory attributes related to unit type and properties of receptive fields. Brain 1984; 107: 727–749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrillo RT. Effect of contactor area on the vibrotactile threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1963; 35: 1962–1966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrillo RT. Temporal summation in vibrotactile sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1965; 37: 843–846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar