Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: An analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration

References

• Bensmaia SJ, Craig JC, Yoshioka T, Johnson KO. SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings. J Neurophysiol 2006; 95: 1771–1782
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bensmaia SJ, Hollins M. Pacinian representations of fine surface texture. Percept Psychophys 2005; 67: 842–854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birznieks I, Jenmalm P, Goodwin AW, Johansson RS. Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 8222–8237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake DT, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO. Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: The relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 7480–7489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisben AJ, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO. Detection of vibration transmitted through an object grasped in the hand. J Neurophysiol 1999; 81: 1548–1558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor CE, Hsiao SS, Phillips JR, Johnson KO. Tactile roughness: Neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. J Neurosci 1990; 10: 3823–3836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor CE, Johnson KO. Neural coding of tactile texture: Comparisons of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 3414–3426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JC, Rollman GB. Somesthesis. Annu Rev Psychol 1999; 50: 305–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edin BB, Johansson N. Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system. J Physiol 1995; 487: 243–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman G, Hosman J, Lindstrom B. Roughness, smoothness and preference: A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects. J Exp Psychol 1965; 70: 18–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardner EP, Palmer CI. Simulation of motion on the skin. I. Receptive fields and temporal frequency coding by cutaneous mechanoreceptors of Optacon pulses delivered to the hand. J Neurophysiol 1989a; 62: 1410–1436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner EP, Palmer CI. Simulation of motion on the skin. II. Cutaneous mechanoreceptor coding of the width and texture of bar patterns displaced across the Optacon. J Neurophysiol 1989b; 62: 1437–1460
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gescheider GA, Bolanowski SJ, Greenfield TC, Brunette KE. Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: A multidimensional analysis. Somatosens Mot Res 2005; 22: 127–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin AW, Browning AS, Wheat HE. Representation of curved surfaces in responses of mechanoreceptive afferent fibers innervating the monkey's fingerpad. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 798–810
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodwin AW, Morley JW. Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: Representation of grating and movement features in afferent fiber responses. J Neurosci 1987; 7: 2168–2180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollins M, Bensmaïa SJ, Karlof K, Young F. Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Percept Psychophys 2000; 62: 1534–1544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Bensmaïa SJ, Risner R. The duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Grondin S, Lacouture Y, editors. Fechner Day 98: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. The International Society for Psychophysics, QuebecCanada 1998; 115–120
   Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Bensmaia SJ, Washburn S. Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. Somatosens Mot Res 2001; 18: 253–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Faldowski R, Rao S, Young F. Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional-scaling analysis. Percept Psychophys 1993; 54: 697–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Lorenz F, Harper D. Somatosensory coding of roughness: The effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 5582–5588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Lorenz F, Seeger A, Taylor R. Factors contributing to the integration of textural qualities: Evidence from virtual surfaces. Somatosens Mot Res 2005; 22: 193–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Risner SR. Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Percept Psychophys 2000; 62: 695–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Seeger A, Pelli G, Taylor R. Haptic perception of virtual surfaces: Scaling subjective qualities and interstimulus differences. Perception 2004; 33: 1001–1019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iggo A. Cutaneous receptors with a high sensitivity to mechanical displacement. Touch, heat and pain, AV de Reuck, J Knight. Little, Brown, Boston 1966; 237–260
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KO, Msiao SS. Neural Mechanisms of factual form and texture perception. Annu Rev Neurosci 15: 1992; 227–250
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KO. Neural basis of haptic perception. In: Yantis S, editor. Stevens handbook of experimental psychology. 3rd ed. Sensation and perception, New York: Wiley 2002; Vol. 1: 537–583
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KO, Yoshioka T. Neural mechanisms of tactile form and texture perception. The somatosensory system: Deciphering the brain's own body image, RJ Nelson. CRC Press, Boca Raton 2002; 73–101
   Google Scholar
• Katz D. Der Aufbau der Tastwelt. Barth, Leipzig 1925
   Google Scholar
• Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Hamilton C, Grindley M, Swendsen RH. Feeling textures through a probe: Effects of probe and surface geometry and exploratory factors. Percept Psychophys 2003; 65: 613–631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knibestöl M. Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J Physiol 1975; 245: 63–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kops CE, Gardner EP. Discrimination of simulated texture patterns on the human hand. J Neurophysiol 1996; 76: 1145–1165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb GD. Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: Psychophysical performance measurements in humans. J Physiol 1983; 338: 551–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMotte RH. Softness discrimination with a tool. J Neurophysiol 2000; 83: 1777–1786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMotte RH, Friedman RM, Lu C, Khalsa PS, Srinivasan MA. Raised object on a planar surface stroked across the fingerpad: Responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to shape and orientation. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80: 2446–2466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ. Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: The touching process and the effects of macro- and microsurface structure. Percept Psychophys 1974; 16: 385–395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Multisensory texture perception. The handbook of multisensory processes, C Spence, G Calvert, BE Stein. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2004; 107–122
   Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL, Hamilton CL, Ramsay GI. Perceiving surface roughness via a rigid probe: Effects of exploration speed and mode of touch. Electron J Haptic Res 1999; 1: 1–20
   Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Taylor MM. Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch. Percept Psychophys 1972; 12: 401–408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makous JC, Friedman RM, Vierck CJ. A Critical band filter in touch. J Neurosci 15 1995; 2808–2818
   Google Scholar
• Meftah EM, Belingard L, Chapman CE. Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch. Exp Brain Res 2000; 132: 351–361
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morioka M, Griffin MJ. Independent responses of Pacinian and Non-Pacinian systems with hand-transmitted vibration detected from masked thresholds. Somatosens Mot Res 2005a; 22: 69–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morioka M, Griffin MJ. Thresholds for the perception of hand-transmitted vibration: Dependence on contact area and contact location. Somatosens Mot Res 2005b; 22: 281–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley JW, Goodwin AW. Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: Temporal patterns of afferent fiber responses. J Neurosci 1987; 7: 2181–2191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morley JW, Goodwin AW, Darian-Smith I. Tactile discrimination of gratings. Exp Brain Res 1983; 49: 291–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JR, Johnson KO. Tactile spatial resolution: II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J Neurophysiol 1981; 46: 1192–1203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard D, Dacremont C, Valentin D, Giboreau A. Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2003; 114: 165–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathian K, Goodwin AW, John KT, Darian-Smith I. Perceived roughness of a grating: Correlation with responses of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the monkey's fingerpad. J Neurosci 1989; 9: 1273–1279
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith AM, Scott SH. Subjective scaling of smooth surface friction. J Neurophysiol 1996; 75: 1957–1962
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Srinivasan MA, LaMotte RH. Tactual discrimination of softness. J Neurophysiol 1995; 73: 88–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrillo RT. Effect of contactor area on the vibrotactile threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1963; 35: 1962–1966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt I, Hensel H. Afferente Impulse aus der Extremitatenhaut der Katze bei thermischer und mechanischer Reisung. Pflugers Arch ges Physiol 1959; 268: 582–596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshioka T, Gibb B, Dorsch AK, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO. Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 6905– 6916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar