Methane inhibition by Asparagopsis taxiformis with rumen fluid collected from ventral and central location – a pilot study

References

• Alvarez Hess, P. S., Eckard, R. J., Jacobs, J. L., Hannah, M. C. & Moate, P. J. (2019). Comparison of five methods for the estimation of methane production from vented in vitro systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99, 109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andries, J. I., Buysse, F. X., Debrabander, D. L. & Cottyn, B. G. (1987). Isoacids in ruminant nutrition: their role in ruminal and intermediary metabolism and possible influences on performances — a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 18, 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. (1995). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (Arlington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists).
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A. M. (1964). Variations in the pH and volatile fatty acid concentration within the bovine reticulo-rumen. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 7, 694–706.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, M. P. & Robinson, H. M. (1968). Effects of diet, time after feeding, and position sampled on numbers of viable bacteria in the bovine rumen. Journal of Dairy Science, 51, 1950–1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattani, M., Maccarana, L., Rossi, G., Tagliapietra, F., Schiavon, S. & Bailoni, L. (2016). Dose-response and inclusion effects of pure natural extracts and synthetic compounds on in vitro methane production. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 218, 100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. L., Bannink, A., Hindrichsen, I. K., Kinley, R. D., Pellikaan, W. F., Milora, N. & Dijkstra, J. (2016). The effect of lactic acid bacteria included as a probiotic or silage inoculant on in vitro rumen digestibility, total gas and methane production. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 211, 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agriculture Handbook 379. Washington, DC: USDA - ARS.
   Google Scholar
• Kidane, A., Øverland, M., Mydland, L. T. & Prestløkken, E. (2018). Interaction between feed use efficiency and level of dietary crude protein on enteric methane emission and apparent nitrogen use efficiency with Norwegian Red dairy cows1. Journal of Animal Science, 96, 3967–3982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinley, R. D., Vucko, M. J., Machado, L. & Tomkins, N. W. (2016). In vitro evaluation of the antimethanogenic potency and effects on fermentation of individual and combinations of marine macroalgae. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 07, 2038–2054.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, L., Magnusson, M., Paul, N. A., de Nys, R. & Tomkins, N. (2014). Effects of marine and freshwater macroalgae on in vitro total gas and methane production. PLoS One, 9, e85289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, L., Magnusson, M., Paul, N. A., Kinley, R., de Nys, R. & Tomkins, N. (2016a). Dose-response effects of Asparagopsis taxiformis and Oedogonium sp. on in vitro fermentation and methane production. Journal of Applied Phycology, 28, 1443–1452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, L., Magnusson, M., Paul, N. A., Kinley, R., de Nys, R. & Tomkins, N. (2016b). Identification of bioactives from the red seaweed Asparagopsis taxiformis that promote antimethanogenic activity in vitro. Journal of Applied Phycology, 28, 3117–3126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. & Michalet-Doreau, B. (1995). Variations in mass and enzyme activity of rumen microorganisms: effect of barley and buffer supplements. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 67, 407–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meale, S. J., Chaves, A. V., Baah, J. & McAllister, T. A. (2012). Methane production of different forages in in vitro ruminal fermentation. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 25, 86–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsumori, M., Shinkai, T., Takenaka, A., Enishi, O., Higuchi, K., Kobayashi, Y., Nonaka, I., Asanuma, N., Denman, S. E. & McSweeney, C. S. (2012). Responses in digestion, rumen fermentation and microbial populations to inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analogue. British Journal of Nutrition, 108, 482–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgavi, D. P., Forano, E., Martin, C. & Newbold, C. J. (2010). Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal, 4, 1024–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NorFor—The Nordic Feed Evaluation System. (2011). EAAP Publication No. 130; Volden, H., Ed. (Wageningen: Academic Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Roque, B. M., Brooke, C. G., Ladau, J., Polley, T., Marsh, L., Najafi, J., Pandey, N., Singh, P., Kinley, L. & Salwen, R. (2019). Effect of the macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis on methane production and rumen microbiome assemblage. Animal Microbiome, 1, 3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen, J. S., Chai, Z., Song, L. J., Liu, J. X. & Wu, Y. M. (2012). Insertion depth of oral stomach tubes may affect the fermentation parameters of ruminal fluid collected in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 5978–5984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjaastad, Ø. V., Sand, O. & Hove, K. (2016). Physiology of Domestic Animals (3rd ed). Oslo: Scandinavian Veterinary Press).
   Google Scholar
• Song, J., Choi, H., Jeong, J. Y., Lee, S., Lee, H. J., Baek, Y., Ji, S. Y. & Kim, M. (2018). Effects of sampling techniques and sites on rumen microbiome and fermentation parameters in Hanwoo steers. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 28, 1700–1705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafaj, M., Junck, B., Maulbetsch, A., Steingass, H., Piepho, H. P. & Drochner, W. (2004). Digesta characteristics of dorsal, middle and ventral rumen of cows fed with different hay qualities and concentrate levels. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 58, 325–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terranova, M., Eggerschwiler, L., Ortmann, S., Clauss, M., Kreuzer, M. & Schwarm, A. (2021). Increasing the proportion of hazel leaves in the diet of dairy cows reduced methane yield and excretion of nitrogen in volatile form, but not milk yield. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 276, 114790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiex, N. J., Manson, H., Anderson, S., Persson, J. Å. & Collaborators: Anderson, S., Bogren, E., Bolek, G., Budde, D., Ellis, C., Eriksson, S., Field, G., Frankenius, E., Henderson, C., Henry, C., Kapphahn, M., Lundberg, L., Manson, H.,Moller, J., Russell, M., Sefert-Schwind, J. & Spann, M. (2002). Determination of crude protein in animal feed, forage, grain, and oilseeds by using block digestion with a copper catalyst and steam distillation into boric acid: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 85, 309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungerfeld, E. M. (2015). Shifts in metabolic hydrogen sinks in the methanogenesis-inhibited ruminal fermentation: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucko, M. J., Magnusson, M., Kinley, R. D., Villart, C. & de Nys, R. (2017). The effects of processing on the in vitro antimethanogenic capacity and concentration of secondary metabolites of Asparagopsis taxiformis. Journal of Applied Phycology, 29, 1577–1586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Xu, Z., Bach, S. J. & McAllister, T. A. (2008). Effects of phlorotannins from Ascophyllum nodosum (brown seaweed) on in vitro ruminal digestion of mixed forage or barley grain. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 145, 375–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. M., Kennedy, F. S. & Wolfe, R. S. (1968). Reaction of multihalogenated hydrocarbons with free and bound reduced vitamin B12. Biochemistry, 7, 1707–1713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Morgavi, D. P., ÓKiely, P., Reynolds, C. K., Schwarm, A., Shingfield, K. J., Yu, Z. & Hristov, A. N. (2016). Design, implementation and interpretation of in vitro batch culture experiments to assess enteric methane mitigation in ruminants—a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 216, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitz, J. O., Ineichen, S., Soliva, C. R., Leiber, F., Tschuor, A., Braun, U., Kreuzer, M. & Clauss, M. (2016). Variability in microbial population and fermentation traits at various sites within the forestomach and along the digestive tract as assessed in goats fed either grass or browse. Small Ruminant Research, 136, 7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar