Test retest variability in stereoacuity measurements

References

• O’Connor AR, Tidbury LP. Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth? Clin Exp Optometry. 2018;101(4):485–494. doi:10.1111/cxo.12655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn LL, Evans BJ, Edgar DF, Fortuin MF. Manufacturer changes lead to clinically important differences between two editions of the TNO stereotest. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(2):243–249. doi:10.1111/opo.12101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Cruz A, Morale SE, Jost RM, Kelly KR, Birch EE. Modified test protocol improves sensitivity of the stereo fly test. Am Orthop J. 2016;66(1):122–125. doi:10.3368/aoj.66.1.122.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe FJ, Hepworth LR, Howard C, Chean CS, Mistry M. Comparative analysis of the Lang Stereopad in a non-clinic population. Strabismus. 2019;27(3):182–190. doi:10.1080/09273972.2019.1643893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vancleef K, Serrano-Pedraza I, Sharp C, et al. ASTEROID: a new clinical stereotest on an autostereo 3D tablet. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(1):25. doi:10.1167/tvst.8.1.25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes JM, Birch EE, Leske DA, Fu VL, Mohney BG. New tests of distance stereoacuity and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(6):1215–1220. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathacopoulos RA, Rosenbaum AL, Zanoni D, et al. Distance stereoacuity: assessing control in intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma P. The pursuit of stereopsis. J AAPOS. 2018;22: 2:e1–2 e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piano ME, Tidbury LP, O’Connor AR. Normative values for near and distance clinical tests of stereoacuity. Strabismus. 2016;24:169–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnham L, Sloper JJ. Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(1):91–95. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.077719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohr I, Read JC. Stereoacuity with Frisby and revised FD2 stereo tests. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82999. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt PP. Vision screening with the RDE stereotest in pediatric populations. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71(4):273–281. doi:10.1097/00006324-199404000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt P, Maguire M, Kulp MT, Dobson V, Quinn G, Vision in Preschoolers Study G. Random Dot E stereotest: testability and reliability in 3- to 5-year-old children. J AAPOS. 2006;10:507–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett SL, Birch EE. Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2000;4(6):354–358. doi:10.1067/mpa.2000.110340.
   Google Scholar
• Simons K. Stereoacuity norms in young children. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(3):439–445. doi:10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010441010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adler P, Scally AJ, Barrett BT. Test–retest variability of Randot stereoacuity measures gathered in an unselected sample of UK primary school children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):656–661. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaslin AG, Vancleef K, Hubert L, Read JCA, Port N. Stereotest comparison: efficacy, reliability, and variability of a new glasses-free stereotest. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(9):29. doi:10.1167/tvst.9.9.29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antona B, Barrio A, Sanchez I, Gonzalez E, Gonzalez G. Intraexaminer repeatability and agreement in stereoacuity measurements made in young adults. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:374–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leske DA, Birch EE, Holmes JM. Real depth vs Randot stereotests. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(4):699–701. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett SL. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2005;9(6):572–578. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.06.006.
   Google Scholar
• Vancleef K, Read JCA. Which stereotest do you use? A survey research study in the British Isles, the United States and Canada. Br Ir Orthopt J. 2019;15(1):15–24. doi:10.22599/bioj.120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vancleef K, Read JCA, Herbert W, Goodship N, Woodhouse M, Serrano-Pedraza I. Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37(4):507–520. doi:10.1111/opo.12371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons K, Elhatton K. Artifacts in fusion and stereopsis testing based on red/green dichoptic image separation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1994;31(5):290–297. doi:10.3928/0191-3913-19940901-05.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornforth LL, Johnson BL, Kohl P, Roth N. Chromatic imbalance due to commonly used red-green filters reduces accuracy of stereoscopic depth perception. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64(11):842–845. doi:10.1097/00006324-198711000-00007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serrano-Pedraza I, Vancleef K, Read JC. Avoiding monocular artifacts in clinical stereotests presented on column-interleaved digital stereoscopic displays. J Vis. 2016;16:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Koo NK. Change of stereoacuity with aging in normal eyes. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005;19(2):136–139. doi:10.3341/kjo.2005.19.2.136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaroff CM, Knutelska M, Frumkes TE. Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(2):891–900. doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar