Design-space dimensionality reduction in global optimization of functional surfaces: recent developments and way forward

References

• Bassanini P, Bulgarelli U, Campana EF, Lalli F. 1994. The wave resistance problem in a boundary integral formulation. Surv Math Ind. 4:151–194.
   Google Scholar
• Beran PS, Bryson D, Thelen AS, Diez M, Serani A. 2020. Comparison of multi-fidelity approaches for military vehicle design. In: AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM; p. 3158.
   Google Scholar
• Borzì A, Schulz V, Schillings C, Von Winckel G. 2010. On the treatment of distributed uncertainties in pde-constrained optimization. GAMM-Mitteilungen. 33(2):230–246. doi: 10.1002/gamm.v33:2
   Google Scholar
• Campana EF, Peri D, Tahara Y, Stern F. 2006. Shape optimization in ship hydrodynamics using computational fluid dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 196(1–3):634–651. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinquegrana D, Iuliano E. 2018. Investigation of adaptive design variables bounds in dimensionality reduction for aerodynamic shape optimization. Comput Fluids. 174:89–109. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Agostino D, Serani A, Campana EF, Diez M. 2018. Deep autoencoder for off-line design-space dimensionality reduction in shape optimization. In: 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; p. 1648.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino D, Serani A, Diez M. 2020. Design-space assessment and dimensionality reduction: an off-line method for shape reparameterization in simulation-based optimization. Ocean Eng. 197:106852. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson CW. 1977. A practical computer method for solving ship-wave problems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Berkeley; p. 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Diez M, Campana EF, Stern F. 2015. Design-space dimensionality reduction in shape optimization by Karhunen–Loève expansion. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 283:1525–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez M, Campana EF, Stern F. 2018. Stochastic optimization methods for ship resistance and operational efficiency via cfd. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 57(2):735–758. doi: 10.1007/s00158-017-1775-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoropoulos G, Campana E, Diez M, Serani A, Goren O, Sariöz K, Danisman D, Visonneau M, Queutey P, Abdel-Maksoud M, et al. 2017. Mission-based hull-form and propeller optimization of a transom stern destroyer for best performance in the sea environment. In: VII International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering MARINE2017.
   Google Scholar
• Haftka RT, Grandhi RV. 1986. Structural shape optimization-a survey. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 57(1):91–106. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(86)90072-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harries S, Abt C. 2019. Faster turn-around times for the design and optimization of functional surfaces. Ocean Eng. 193:106470. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan S, Kaklis P, Serani A, Diez M. 2022. Geometric moment-dependent global sensitivity analysis without simulation data: application to ship hull form optimisation. Computer-Aided Design; p. 103339.
   Google Scholar
• Le Maître O, Knio OM (2010). Spectral methods for uncertainty quantification: with applications to computational fluid dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lukaczyk T, Palacios F, Alonso JJ, Constantine P. 2014. Active subspaces for shape optimization. In: Proceedings of the 10th AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Specialist Conference, National Harbor; Jan 13–17; Maryland, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrini R, Wackers J, Broglia R, Serani A, Visonneau M, Diez M. 2023. A multi-fidelity active learning method for global design optimization problems with noisy evaluations. Eng Comput. 39:3183–3206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole DJ, Allen CB, Rendall TC. 2015. Metric-based mathematical derivation of efficient airfoil design variables. AIAA J. 53(5):1349–1361. doi: 10.2514/1.J053427
   Google Scholar
• Raghavan B, Xiang L, Breitkopf P, Rassineux A, Villon P. 2013. Towards simultaneous reduction of both input and output spaces for interactive simulation-based structural design. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 265:174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2013.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson G, Keane A. 2001. Concise orthogonal representation of supercritical airfoils. J Aircr. 38(3):580–583. doi: 10.2514/2.2803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samareh JA. 2001. Survey of shape parameterization techniques for high-fidelity multidisciplinary shape optimization. AIAA J. 39(5):877–884. doi: 10.2514/2.1391
   Google Scholar
• Schillings C, Schmidt S, Schulz V. 2011. Efficient shape optimization for certain and uncertain aerodynamic design. Comput Fluids. 46(1):78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichting H, Gersten K (2000). Boundary-Layer theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sederberg TW, Parry SR. 1986. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Graph. 20(4):151–160. doi: 10.1145/15886.15903
   Google Scholar
• Serani A, Campana EF, Diez M, Stern F. 2017. Towards augmented design-space exploration via combined geometry and physics based Karhunen-Loève expansion. In: 18th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference (MA&O), AVIATION 2017; Jun 5–9; Denver, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Serani A, D'Agostino D, Campana EF, Diez M. 2020. Assessing the interplay of shape and physical parameters by unsupervised nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods. J Ship Res. 64(04):313–327. doi: 10.5957/JOSR.09180056(pp. 1–15).
   Google Scholar
• Serani A, Diez M. 2018. Shape optimization under stochastic conditions by design-space augmented dimensionality reduction. In: 19th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference (MA&O), AVIATION 2018; Jun 25–29; Atlanta, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Serani A, Diez M. 2023. Parametric model embedding. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 404:115776. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serani A, Diez M, Campana EF, Fasano G, Peri D, Iemma U. 2015. Globally convergent hybridization of particle swarm optimization using line search-based derivative-free techniques. In: Yang X-S, editor. Recent Advances in Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation. Vol. 585, Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer International Publishing; p. 25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Serani A, Diez M, Wackers J, Visonneau M, Stern F. 2019. Stochastic shape optimization via design-space augmented dimensionality reduction and rans computations. In: AIAA SciTech 2019 Forum; p. 2218.
   Google Scholar
• Serani A, Fasano G, Liuzzi G, Lucidi S, Iemma U, Campana EF, Stern F, Diez M. 2016. Ship hydrodynamic optimization by local hybridization of deterministic derivative-free global algorithms. Appl Ocean Res. 59:115–128. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serani A, Leotardi C, Iemma U, Campana EF, Fasano G, Diez M. 2016. Parameter selection in synchronous and asynchronous deterministic particle swarm optimization for ship hydrodynamics problems. Appl Soft Comput. 49:313–334. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieger D, Menzel S, Botsch M. 2015. New Challenges in Grid Generation and Adaptivity for Scientific Computing, chap. On Shape Deformation Techniques for Simulation-Based Design Optimization. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 281–303.
   Google Scholar
• Toal DJ, Bressloff NW, Keane AJ, Holden CM. 2010. Geometric filtration using proper orthogonal decomposition for aerodynamic design optimization. AIAA J. 48(5):916–928. doi: 10.2514/1.41420
   Google Scholar
• Volpi S, Diez M, Stern F. 2018. Multidisciplinary design optimization of a 3D composite hydrofoil via variable accuracy architecture. In: 2018 Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference; p. 4173.
   Google Scholar