On parametric modelling, digital siblings and ship design optimization

References

• Boulougouris V, Papanikolaou A, Zaraphonitis G. 2004. Optimization of arrangements of Ro-Ro passenger ships with genetic algorithms. J Sh Technol Res. 51(3):99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan TAMT. 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 6(2):182–197. doi:10.1109/4235.996017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JH. 1959. Basic design concepts. J American Society of Naval Engineers. 71(4):671–678.
   Google Scholar
• Greaves M. 2015. Digital Twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275211047.
   Google Scholar
• Harries S. 1998. Parametric design and hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms [Ph.D. Thesis], Technical University Berlin, Mensch & Buch Verlag, ISBN 3-933346-24-X.
   Google Scholar
• Harries S, Abt C. 2019. CAESES – the HOLISHIP platform for process integration and design optimization, chapter 8. In: Papanikolaou A., editor. A holistic approach to ship design, vol. 1: optimisation of ship design and operation for life cycle. Cham, Switzerland: SPRINGER; p. 247–294.
   Google Scholar
• Harries S, Abt C. 2021. Integration of tools for application case studies, Chapter 2. In: Papanikolaou A., editor. A holistic approach to ship design, vol. 2: application cases. Cham, Switzerland: SPRINGER; p. 7–46.
   Google Scholar
• HOLISHIP. 2016-2020. Holistic Optimisation of Ship Design and Operation for Life Cycle. Project funded by the European Commission, H2020- DG Research, Grant Agreement 689074, http://www.holiship.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Kusaka Y, Nakamura H, Kunitake Y. 1980. Hull form design of the semi-submersed catamaran vessel. Proc. 13th ONR Symposium of Naval Hydrodynamics; Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Mauro F, Kana A. 2023. Digital twin for ship life-cycle: a critical systematic review. Ocean Eng. 269:113479. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy R, Sabat D, Taylor R. 1965. Least cost ship characteristics by computer techniques. Mar Tech, SNAME. 2(02):174–202.
   Google Scholar
• Nowacki H. 2010. Five decades of computer-aided ship design. J Comput-Aided Des. 42(11):956–969. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2009.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowacki H. 2016. A farewell to the design spiral. Invited note presented at the Mini-Symposium on Ship Design, Ship Hydrodynamics & Maritime Safety; Athens, September 30, 2016, https://www.academia.edu/42261670/A_Farewell_to_the_Design_Spiral_A_Farewell_to_the_Design_Spiral.
   Google Scholar
• Nowacki H. 2019. On the history of ship design for the life cycle, Chapter 3. In: Papanikolaou A., editor. A holistic approach to ship design, vol. 1: optimisation of ship design and operation for life cycle. Cham, Switzerland: SPRINGER; p. 43–74.
   Google Scholar
• Nowacki H, Brusis F, Swift PM. 1970. Tanker preliminary design – an optimization problem with constraints. Trans SNAME. 78(9):16.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou Α, Androulakakis Μ. 1991. Hydrodynamic optimization of high-speed SWATH. Proc. of 1st FAST ‘91 Conf; Trondheim, June 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou Α, Kaklis Ρ, Koskinas C, Spanos D. 1996. Hydrodynamic optimization of fast displacement catamarans. Proc. 2lst int. Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, ONR’ 96; Trondheim, June 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou Α, Nowacki Η, Androulakakis M, Zaraphonitis G. 1989. Concept design and optimization of a SWATH passenger/car ferry. Proc. IMAS-89 int. Conf. on Applications of new Technology in Shipping; Athens, May 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A. 2010. Holistic ship design optimization. J Comput-Aided Des. 42(11):1028–1044. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2009.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A. 2014. Ship design- methodologies of preliminary design. Heidelberg: SPRINGER. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8751-2.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A. 2019. A holistic approach to ship design, vol. 1: optimisation of ship design and operation for life cycle. Cham, Switzerland: SPRINGER. doi:978-3030028091.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A. 2021. A holistic approach to ship design, vol. 2: application cases. Cham, Switzerland: SPRINGER. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71091-0.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A, Harries S, Hooijmans P, Marzi J, Le Nena R, Torben S, Yrjänäinen A, Boden B. 2022a. A holistic approach to ship design: tools and applications. J Sh Res. 66(1):25–53. doi:10.5957/JOSR.12190070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A, Harries S, Marzi J, Mermiris G, Jokinen M, Aubert A, Gunawan R, Zaraphonitis G. 2022b. Holistic ship design for green shipping. Transport Research Arena 2022 (TRA2022); Lisbon, Portugal, 14–17 November.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A., Harries S., Wilken M., Zaraphonitis G. 2011. Integrated Design and Multi-objective Optimization Approach to Ship Design. Proc. ICCAS 2011, Trieste, September 2011..
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A, Xing-Kaeding Y, Strobel H, Kanellopoulou A, Zaraphonitis G, Tolo E. 2020. Numerical and experimental optimization study on a fast, zero emission catamaran. J Mar Sci Eng. 8(8):657. doi:10.3390/jmse8090657.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A, Zaraphonitis G, Boulougouris E, Langbecker U, Matho S, Sames P. 2010. Multi-objective optimization of oil tanker design. J Mar Sci Technol. 15(4):359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvesen N, Kerczek CV, Scragg C. 1985. Hydro-numeric design of SWATH ships. Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng. 93.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Kosasih E, Zhang Y, Brintrup A, Calinescu A. 2022. Digital twins: state of the art theory and practice, challenges, and open research questions. J Ind Inf Integr. 30:100383. doi:10.1016/j.jii.2022.100383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart R. 1980. Ship design and construction. New York: SNAME Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzcu C, Dinsdale C, Hawkins J, Zaraphonitis G, Papadopoulos F. 2021. Ropax design revisited – evolution or revolution? In: Papanikolaou A., editor. A holistic approach to ship design, vol. 2: application cases. Cham, Switzerland: SPRINGER; p. 327–372.
   Google Scholar
• Xing-Kaeding Y, Papanikolaou A. 2021. Optimization of the propulsive efficiency of a fast catamaran. J Mar Sci Eng. 9:492. doi:10.3390/jmse9050492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaraphonitis G, Papanikolaou A, Mourkoyiannis D. 2003. Hull form optimization of high-speed vessels with respect to wash and powering. Proc. 8th International Marine Design Conference (IMDC); Athens, 5–8 May 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Zaraphonitis G, Plessas T, Kraus A, Gudenschwager A, Schellenberger G. 2019. Parametric optimisation in concept and pre-contract ship design stage, Chapter 7. In: Papanikolaou A., editor. A holistic approach to ship design, vol. 1: optimisation of ship design and operation for life cycle. Cham, Switzerland: SPRINGER; p. 209–246.
   Google Scholar
• Zaraphonitis G, Skoupas S, Papanikolaou A, Cardinale M. 2012. Multi-objective optimization of watertight subdivision of RoPAX ships considering the SOLAS 2009 and GOALDS s factor formulations. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on the Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles (STAB2012); Athens, 23-28 September.
   Google Scholar