Kickstarting science? Crowdfunded research, public engagement, and the participatory condition

References

• Addison, C. and Stevens, H. (2021) Crowdfunding conservation science: tracing the participatory dynamics of native parrot genome sequencing, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(3), pp. 568–596. doi:10.1177/01622439211005021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, D., Coleman, G., Ross, C., Sterne, J. and Tembeck, T.2016) The Participatory Condition in the Digital Age (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. E. K., Ranganathan, J., Walker, B. L. E. and Faulkes, Z. (2014) To crowdfund research, scientists must build an audience for their work, PLoS ONE, 9(12), pp. e110329. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory (London: Sage)).
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J. and Kearnes, M. (2020) Remaking participation in science and democracy, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(3), pp. 347–380. doi:10.1177/0162243919850885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. (2015) Three provocations for civic crowdfunding, Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), pp. 342–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Experiment. 2022. About Us. Available at https://experiment.com/about (accessed 20 June, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Gaggioli, A. and Riva, G. (2008) Working the crowd, Science, 321(5895), pp. 1443–1443. doi:10.1126/science.321.5895.1443a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldacre, B. 2005. Don’t dumb me down, The Guardian, September 8.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, J. and Gerber, E. 2015. Crowdfunding Science: Sharing Research with an Extended Audience, In CSCW ‘15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 31–43. doi:10.1145/2675133.2675188.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, A. (2015) Crowdfunding independent and freelance journalism: Negotiating journalistic norms of autonomy and objectivity, New Media & Society, 17(2), pp. 272–288. doi:10.1177/1461444814558915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (1996) Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, C. M. (2019) The Participant: A Century of Participation in Four Stories (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, N. (2021) Like a grinding stone: How crowdfunding platforms create, perpetuate, and value health inequities, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 35(3), pp. 327–345. doi:10.1111/maq.12639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer, M. 2016, May 26. Grant Renewal Success Rates: Then and Now – NIH Extramural Nexus. National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2016/05/26/grant-renewal-success-rates-then-and-now/.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2018) The future(s) of open science, Social Studies of Science, 48(2), pp. 171–203. doi:10.1177/0306312718772086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuwelt-Kearns, C., Baker, T., Calder-Dawe, O., Bartos, A. E. and Wardell, S. (2021) Getting the crowd to care: Marketing illness through health-related crowdfunding in Aotearoa New Zealand, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 0(0), pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. (2012) Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, K. M., Markowitz, E. M. and Brossard, D. (2020) Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(3), pp. 1274–1276. doi:10.1073/pnas.1916740117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H., Franzoni, C. and Shafi, K. (2019) Crowdfunding scientific research: Descriptive insights and correlates of funding success, PLoS ONE, 14(1), pp. e0208384. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S., Metag, J., Feustle, J. and Herzog, L. (2018) Selling science 2.0: What scientific projects receive crowdfunding online?, Public Understanding of Science, 27(5), pp. 496–514. doi:10.1177/0963662516668771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte to Bühne, H., Pettorelli, N. and Hoffmann, M. (2022) The policy consequences of defining rewilding, Ambio, 51, pp. 93–102. doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01560-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siva, N. (2014) Crowdfunding for medical research picks up pace, The Lancet, 384(9948), pp. 1085–1086. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61661-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. N. (2015) The backer–developer connection: Exploring crowdfunding’s influence on video game production, New Media & Society, 17(2), pp. 198–214. doi:10.1177/1461444814558910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J. and Wilsdon, J. (2014) Why should we promote public engagement with science?, Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), pp. 4–15. doi:10.1177/0963662513518154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, B. J., Baudry, J., Mahr, D., Sanchez, G. and Tancoigne, E. (2019) Citizen science”? Rethinking science and public participation, Science and Technology Studies, 32(2), pp. 52–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheat, R. E., Wang, Y., Byrnes, J. E. and Ranganathan, J. (2013) Raising money for scientific research through crowdfunding, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(2), pp. 71–72. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – hitting the notes, but missing the music?, Community Genetics, 9(3), pp. 211–220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar