Statistically equivalent representative volume elements (SERVE) for material behaviour analysis and multiscale modelling

REFERENCES

• Furrer D, Noraas R, Brough D. Industrial applications of microstructural characterization – current and potential future issues and applications, statistical methods for materials science. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dallair M, Furrer D. Quantitative metallography of titanium alloys. Adv Mater Processes. 2004;162(12):25–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiley J, Searles T, Lee E, et al. Quantification of microstructural features in α/β titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;372(1–2):191–198. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2003.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson GB. Computational design of hierarchically structured materials. Science. 1997;277:1237–1242. doi:10.1126/science.277.5330.1237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondiere A, Déneux V, Binot N, et al. Controlling the MC and M2C carbide precipitation in Ferrium® M54® steel to achieve optimum ultimate tensile strength/fracture toughness balance. Mater Charact. 2018;140:103–112. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2018.03.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jou H-J. Microstructure modeling of third generation disk alloys. NASA/CR—. 2010: 2010–216748. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20100026665.
   Google Scholar
• Pinz M, Weber G, Stinville JC, et al. Data-driven Bayesian model for predicting fatigue crack nucleation in polycrystalline Ni-based superalloys. npj Comp Mater. 2022;8:39. doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00727-5
   Google Scholar
• Sangid MD, Sehitoglu H, Maier HJ, et al. Role of microstructure in predicting fatigue performance, 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, 23 - 26 April 2012, 2012; Honolulu, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Stinville JC, Lenthe WC, Miao J, et al. A combined grain scale elastic–plastic criterion for identification of fatigue crack initiation sites in a twin containing polycrystalline nickel-base superalloy. Acta Mater. 2016;103:461–473. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCost BL, Francis T, Holm EA. Exploring the microstructure manifold: image texture representations applied to ultrahigh carbon steel microstructures. Acta Mater. 2017;133:30–40. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge M, Su F, Zhao Z, et al. Deep learning analysis on microscopic imaging in materials science. Mater Today Nano. 2020;11:100087, doi:10.1016/j.mtnano.2020.100087
   Google Scholar
• Noraas R, Venkatesh V, Rettberg L, et al. Recognition and quantification of dual phase titanium alloy microstructures using convolutional neural networks. The 14th World Conference on Titanium, MATEC Web of Conferences. 2020;321:11084. doi:10.1051/matecconf/202032111084
   Google Scholar
• Noraas R, Somanath N, Giering M, et al. Structural material property tailoring of dual phase titanium alloy microstructures using deep neural networks, AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, 6-10 January 2020, 2020 Orlando, FL https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1151.
   Google Scholar
• Larmuseau M, Sluydts M, Theuwissen K, et al. Compact representations of microstructure images using triplet networks. NPJ Comp Mater. 2020;6:156, doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00423-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feri LE, Ahn J, Lutfillohonov S, et al. A three-dimensional microstructure recognition framework for permeable pavement analysis based on a 3D-IWGAN with enhanced gradient penalty. Sensors. 2021;21:3603, doi:10.3390/s21113603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J, Cui S, Cen S, et al. Statistical characterization and reconstruction of heterogeneous microstructures using deep neural network. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engr. 2021;373:113516, doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jangid DK, Brodnik NR, Khan A, et al. 3D grain shape generation in polycrystal using generative adversarial networks. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2022;11:71–84. doi:10.1007/s40192-021-00244-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker R, Richmond O. Incorporation of microstructural geometry in material modelling. Modell Simul. Mater. Sci. Engr. 1994;2:439–454. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/2/3A/002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear AD, Hochhalter JD, Cerrone AR, et al. A method to generate conformal finite-element meshes from 3D measurements of microstructurally small fatigue crack propagation. Fat Frac. Engr. Mater Struct. 2016;39:737–751. doi:10.1111/ffe.12449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Tu X, Ghosh S. Wavelet-enriched adaptive hierarchical FE model for coupled crystal plasticity-phase field modeling of crack propagation in polycrystalline microstructures. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng. 2020;361:112757. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu X, Ray A, Ghosh S. A coupled crystal plasticity FEM and phase-field model for crack evolution in microstructures of 7000 series aluminum alloys. Eng Fract Mech. 2020a;230:106970. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloth T, Ghosh S. Coupled crystal plasticity phase-field model for ductile fracture in polycrystalline microstructures. Int J Multiscale Comp Eng. 2023;21(2):1–19. doi:10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2022042164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Kotha S, Noraas R, et al. Developing parametrically upscaled constitutive and crack nucleation models for the α/β Ti64 alloy. Int. Jour. Plast. 2022;151:103182. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotha S, Ozturk D, Smarslok B, et al. Uncertainty quantified parametrically homogenized constitutive models for microstructure-integrated structural simulations. Integ Mater Manuf Innov IMMI. 2020a;9:322–338. doi:10.1007/s40192-020-00187-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotha S, Ozturk D, Ghosh S. Uncertainty-quantified parametrically homogenized constitutive models (UQ-PHCMS) for dual-phase alpha/beta titanium alloys. npj Comp Mater. 202b;6:117. doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00379-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Furrer DU, Kosters J, et al. Vision 2040: A roadmap for integrated, multiscale modeling and simulation of materials and systems. 2018 NASA/CR-2018-219771, E-19477, GRC-E-DAA-TN52454.
   Google Scholar
• Dimiduk DM, Parthasarathy TA, Rao SI, et al Predicting the microstructure-dependent mechanical performance of materials for early-stage design. In: Ghosh S., Castro JM., and Lee JK, editors, Materials processing and design: modeling, simulation, and applications, NUMIFORM 2004, AIP CP712, American institute of physic. New York: Springer-Verlag: 2004. p. 1705–1710.
   Google Scholar
• Allison J, Backman D, Christodoulou L. Integrated computational materials engineering: a new paradigm for the global materials profession. JOM. 2006a;58(11):25–30. doi:10.1007/s11837-006-0223-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman DG, Wei DY, Whitis DD, et al. ICME at GE: accelerating the insertion of New materials and processes. JOM. 2006;58(11):36–41. doi:10.1007/s11837-006-0225-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drosback M. Materials genome initiative: advances and initiatives. JOM. 2014;66(3):334–335. See also Available from: https://www.mgi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/MGI-2021-Strategic-Plan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Groeber MA. Developing virtual microstructures and statistically equivalent representative volume elements for polycrystalline materials. crystal plasticity: atomistics to macroscale (section editors W. Cai and S. ghosh) In: Yip S. and Andreoni W. Handbook of materials modeling, 2nd ed, methods: theory and modeling. Springer International Publishing AG; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Przybyla C, Woodward C. Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME): Advancing computational and experimental methods, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Furrer DU, Dimiduk DM, Cotton JD, et al. Making the case for a model-based definition of engineering materials. Integ Mater Manuf Innov. 2017;6:249–263. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007s40192-017-0102-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen G, Rollins J, Furrer D. Microstructure modeling of forged Waspaloy discs. Superalloys 1996, eds. R. D. Kissinger, et. al., TMS, 1996. p. 613–620.
   Google Scholar
• Gayda J, Furrer D. Dual-microstructure heat treatment. Adv Mater Processes. 2003;July:36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Glavicic MG, Venkatesh V. Integrating computational materials engineering of titanium: current capabilities being developed under the metals affordability initiative. JOM. 2014;66(7):1310–1320. doi:10.1007/s11837-014-1013-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill R. Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J Mech Phys Sol. 1963;11(5):357–372. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashin Z, Shtrikman S. A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Sol. 1963;11(2):127–140. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröner E. Bounds for effective elastic moduli of disordered materials. J Mech Phys Solids. 1977;25:137–155. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(77)90009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan S, Ghosh S. Statistically equivalent representative volume elements for composite microstructures. Part I: With interfacial debonding. J Comp Mater. 2006a;40(7):605–621. doi:10.1177/0021998305055274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan S, Ghosh S, Pagano NJ. Statistically equivalent representative volume elements for composite microstructures. Part I: Without damage. J Comp Mater. 2006b;40(7):583–604. doi:10.1177/0021998305055273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinz M, Weber G, Lenthe W, et al. Microstructure-based statistically equivalent RVEs for sub-grain γ − γ′ microstructures of Nickel-base superalloys. Acta Mater. 2018;157(15):245–258. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.034
   Google Scholar
• Tu X, Shahba A, Shen J, et al. Microstructure and property based statistically equivalent RVEs for polycrystalline-polyphase aluminum alloys. Int Jour Plast. 2019;115:268–292. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu X. Developing image-based crystal plasticity models for deformation and crack propagation in polycrystalline 7000-series aluminum alloys. [PhD thesis]. Johns Hopkins University; 2020b.
   Google Scholar
• Uchic MD, Groeber M, Wheeler R, et al. Augmenting the 3D characterization capability of the dual beam FIB SEM. Micros. Microanal. 2004;10(Supp 2):1136–1137. doi:10.1017/S1431927604886859
   Google Scholar
• Uchic MD, Groeber MA, Dimiduk DM, et al. 3D microstructural characterization of nickel superalloys via serial-sectioning using a dual beam FIB-sem. Scripta Mat. 2006;55(1):23–28. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeber MA, Haley BK, Uchic MD, et al. 3D reconstruction and characterization of polycrystalline microstructures using a FIB-SEM system. Mat Char. 2006;57(4-5):259–273. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2006.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echlin MP, Husseini NS, Nees JA, et al. A New femtosecond laser-based tomography technique for multiphase materials. Adv Mater. 2011;23:2339–2342. doi:10.1002/adma.201003600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echlin MP, Polonsky AT, Lamb J, et al. Recent developments in femtosecond laser-enabled Tribeam systems. JOM. 2021;73(12):4258–4269. doi:10.1007/s11837-021-04919-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juul Jensen D, Lauridsen EM, Margulies L, et al. X-ray microscopy in four dimensions. Mater.Tod. 2006;9:18–25. doi:10.1016/S1369-7021(05)71334-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton K, Poulsen HF. Three-dimensional materials science: an intersection of three-dimensional reconstructions and simulations. MRS Bull. 2008;33:587–595. doi:10.1557/mrs2008.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig W, Reischig P, King A, et al. Three-dimensional grain mapping by x-ray diffraction contrast tomography and the use of Friedel pairs in diffraction data analysis. Rev Sci Instrum. 2009;80:033905. doi:10.1063/1.3100200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienert U, Li SF, Hefferan CM, et al. High-Energy diffraction microscopy at the advanced photon source. JOM. 2011;63(7):70–77. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0116-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuren JC, Shade PA, Bernier JV, et al. New opportunities for quantitative tracking of polycrystal responses in three dimensions. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2015;19:235–244. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostoja-Starzewski M. Material spatial randomness: from statistical to representative volume element. Prob Eng Mech. 2006;21(2):112–132. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostoja-Starzewski M. Microstructural randomness and scaling in mechanics of materials. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell D, Ghosh S, Kalidindi S. Representation and computational structure-property relations of random media. JOM. 2011;63(3):45–51. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0045-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madej L. Digital/virtual microstructures in application to metals engineering – A review. Arch. Civil Mech. Engr. 2017;17:839–854. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2017.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargmann S, Klusemann B, Markmann J, et al. Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials: a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2018;96:322–384. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostanabad R, Zhang Y, Li X, et al. Computational microstructure characterization and reconstruction: review of the state-of-the-art techniques. Prog Mater Sci. 2018;95:1–41. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RM. Mechanics of composite materials. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Drugan WJ, Willis JR. A micromechanics-based nonlocal constitutive equation and estimates of representative volume element size for elastic composites. J Mech Phys Sol. 1996;44:1497–1524. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(96)00007-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torquato S. Random heterogeneous materials. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Pyrz R. Quantitative description of the microstructure of composites. Part I: morphology of unidirectional composite systems. Comp Sci Tech. 2006;50(2):197–208. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(94)90141-4
   Google Scholar
• Böhm JH, Rammerstorfer FG, Weissenbek E. Some simple models for micromechanical investigations of fiber arrangement effects in MMCs. comp. Mater. Sci. 1993;1:177–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sun CT, Vaidya RS. Prediction of composite properties from a representative volume element. compos. Sci. Tech. 1996;56:171–179.
   Google Scholar
• Zeman J, Sejnoha M. From random microstructures to representative volume elements. Modell. Simul. Mat. Sci. Engin. 2007;15(4):S325–S335. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/15/4/S01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissenbek E, Boehm HJ, Rammerstoffer FG. Micromechanical investigations of arrangement effects in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Comput Mater Sci. 1994;3(2):263–278. doi:10.1016/0927-0256(94)90141-4
   Google Scholar
• Yin X, To A, McVeigh C, et al. Statistical volume element method for predicting microstructure–constitutive property relations. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2008;197:3516–3529. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2008.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullwood DT, Niezgoda SR, Adams BL, et al. Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2010;55:477–562. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qidwai SM, Turner DM, Niezgoda SR, et al. Estimating the response of polycrystalline materials using sets of weighted statistical volume elements. Acta Mater. 2012;60:5284–5299. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Kubair DV. Exterior statistics-based boundary conditions for optimal representative volume elements in elastic composites. Jour Mech Phys Sol. 2016;95:1–24. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubair DV, Ghosh S. Exterior statistics based boundary conditions for establishing statistically equivalent representative volume elements of statistically nonhomogeneous elastic microstructures. Int Jour Sol Struct. 2017;112:106–121. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubair DV, Pinz M, Kollins K, et al. Role of exterior statistics-based boundary conditions for property-based statistically equivalent RVEs of polydispersed elastic composites. Jour Comp Mater. 2018;52(21):2919–2928. doi:10.1177/0021998318758498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber G, Pinz M, Ghosh S. Machine learning-enabled self-consistent parametrically-upscaled crystal plasticity model for Ni-based superalloys. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engng. 2022;402:115384. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis JR Elasticity theory of composites, mechanics of solids, The R. hill 60th anniversary volume: 1982, Oxford; Pergamon Press; 1982. p. 653–686
   Google Scholar
• Kanit T, Forest S, Galliet I, et al. Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach. Int J Solids Struct. 2003;40(13-14):3647–3679. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao Y, Stillinger F, Torquato S. Modeling heterogeneous materials via two-point correlation functions: basic principles. Phys Rev E. 2007;76(3):031110. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.031110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echlin MP, Lenthe WC, Pollock TM. Three-dimensional sampling of material structure for property modeling and design. Integ Mater Manuf Innov. 2014a;3(1):21.
   Google Scholar
• Bagri A, Weber G, Stinville JC, et al. Microstructure and property-based statistically equivalent RVEs for polycrystalline Ni-based superalloys with twins. Metall Mater Trans A. 2018;49(11):5727–5744. doi:10.1007/s11661-018-4858-y
   Google Scholar
• Dehoff RT. Quantitative serial sectioning analysis: preview. J Micros. 1983;131:259–263. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1983.tb04254.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral M, Spanos G. Three-dimensional analysis of proeutectoid cementite precipitates. Acta Mater. 1999;47:711–724. doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00321-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral MV, Mangan MA, Spanos G, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of microstructure. Mater. Char. 2000;45:17–23. doi:10.1016/S1044-5803(00)00046-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkemper J, Voorhees P. Quantitative serial sectioning analysis. J Micros. 2001;201:388–394. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00832.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spowart JE, Mullens HM, Puchala BT. Collecting and analyzing microstructures in three dimensions: a fully automated approach. JOM. 2003;55:35–37. doi:10.1007/s11837-003-0173-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchic MD. Serial sectioning methods for generating 3D characterization data of grain- and precipitate-scale microstructures. In: Ghosh S, Dimiduk D, editors. Comp. meth. microstructure-property relationships. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 53–98.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson AJ, Rowenhorst DJ, Sharp KW, et al. Automated methods for the quantification of 3D woven architectures. Mater Char. 2017;124:241–249. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkson BJ, Mulvihill M, Möbus G. 3D determination of grain shape in a FeAl-based nanocomposite by 3D FIB tomography. Scripta Mater. 2001;45:753–758. doi:10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01090-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeber MA. Digital representation of materials grain structure. In: Ghosh S, Dimiduk D, editors. Comp. meth. microstructure-property relationships. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 53–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis AC, Bingert JF, Rowenhorst DJ, et al. Two- and three-dimensional microstructural characterization of a super-austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Engr A. 2006;418:11–18. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2005.09.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echlin MP, Straw M, Randolf S, et al. The TriBeam system: femtosecond laser ablation in situ SEM. Mater Char. 2015;100:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2014.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Ghosh S, Richmond O, et al. Three-dimensional characterization and modeling of particle reinforced metal matrix composites: Part I: quantitative description of microstructural morphology. Mater Sci Engin A. 1999a;265:153–173. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01132-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Ghosh S, Richmond O, et al. Three-dimensional characterization and modeling of particle reinforced metal matrix composites: Part II: damage characterization. Mater Sci Engin A. 1999b;265:221–240. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01133-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossi RH, Georgeson GE. The application of X-ray computed tomography to materials development. JOM. 1991;43(9):8–15. doi:10.1007/BF03222228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson BC, Yang W, Ice GE, et al. Three-dimensional X-ray structural microscopy with submicrometre resolution. Nature. 2002;415:887–890. doi:10.1038/415887a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ice GE, Pang JWL, Barabash RI, et al. Characterization of three-dimensional crystallographic distributions using polychromatic X-ray microdiffraction. Scripta Mater. 2006;55:57–62. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari Y, Sarkar S, Groeber MA, et al. 3D polycrystalline microstructure reconstruction from FIB generated serial sections for FE analysis. Comp Mater Sci. 2007;41:222–235. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plimpton S, Battaile C, Chandross M, et al. Crossing the Mesoscale No-Man's Land via Parallel Kinetic Monte Carlo. Sandia report SAND2009-6226, October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chen LQ. Phase-field models for microstructure evolution. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 2002;32(1):113–140. doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chen LQ and Zhou N. Simulation of microstructural evolution using the phase field method. In: Kaufmann EN editor. Characterization of materials, volume 1, John Wiley & Sons. Inc; 2012. p. 216– 248
   Google Scholar
• Xu T, Sarkar S, Li M, et al. Quantifying microstructures in isotropic grain growth from phase field modeling: methods. Acta Mater. 2012;60:4787–4799. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühbach M, Gottstein G, Barrales-Mora L. A statistical ensemble cellular automaton microstructure model for primary recrystallization. Acta Mater. 2016;107:366–376. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarze C, Kamachali RD, Kühbach M, et al. Computationally efficient phase-field simulation studies using RVE sampling and statistical analysis. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;147:204–216. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quey R, Dawson PR, Barbe F. Large-scale 3D random polycrystals for the finite element method: generation, meshing and remeshing. Comp. Meth Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2011;200:1729–1745. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeber MA, Ghosh S, Uchic MD, et al. A framework for automated analysis and representation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures, part 1: statistical characterization. Acta Mat. 2008a;56(6):1257–1273. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.041
   Google Scholar
• Groeber MA, Ghosh S, Uchic MD, et al. A framework for automated analysis and representation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures, part 2: synthetic structure generation. Acta Mat. 2008b;56(6):1274–1287. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.040
   Google Scholar
• Groeber MA, Jackson M. DREAM.3d: A digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2014;3:56–72. doi:10.1186/2193-9772-3-5
   Google Scholar
• Jackson M, Groeber M, Donegan S, et al. Advancements to the digital representation environment for analysis of materials in 3-dimensions—DREAM.3D. Micros. Microanal. 2019;25(Supp 2):176–177. doi:10.1017/S1431927619001612
   Google Scholar
• Richter H. Mote3D: an open-source toolbox for modelling periodic random particulate microstructures. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Engr. 2017;25:035011, doi:10.1088/1361-651X/aa629a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latypov MI, Khan A, Lang CA, et al. Bisque for 3D materials science in the cloud: microstructure–property linkages. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2019;8:52–65. doi:10.1007/s40192-019-00128-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart KA, Rimoli JJ. Generation of statistically representative microstructures with direct grain geometry control. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2020;370:113242, doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry Serrao P, Sandfeld S, Prakash A. Optimic: A tool to generate optimized polycrystalline microstructures for materials simulations. Software X. 2021;15:100708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usseglio-Viretta FLE, Patel P, Bernhardt E, et al. MATBOX: An open-source microstructure analysis toolbox for microstructure generation, segmentation, characterization, visualization, correlation and meshing. Software X. 2022;17:100915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saylor DM, Fridy J, El-Dasher BS, et al. Statistically representative 3D microstructures based on orthogonal observation sections. Met Mater Trans A. 2004;35:1969–1979. doi:10.1007/s11661-004-0146-0
   Google Scholar
• Saheli G, Garmestani H, Adams B. Microstructure design of a two phase composite using two-point correlation functions. J. Comp Aided Mat Des. 2004;11(2):103–115. doi:10.1007/s10820-005-3164-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundararaghavan V, Zabaras N. Classification and reconstruction of three-dimensional microstructures using support vector machines. Comp Mater Sci. 2005;32(2):223–239. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollett AD, Robert C, Saylor D. Three dimensional microstructures: statistical analysis of second phase particles in AA7075-T651. Mater Sci Forum. 2006;519-521:1–10. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.1
   Google Scholar
• Rollett AD, Lee SB, Campman R, et al. Three-dimensional characterization of microstructure by electron back-scatter diffraction. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2007;37:627–658. doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.084401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao Y, Padilla E, Chawla N. Modeling and predicting microstructure evolution in lead/tin alloy via correlation functions and stochastic material reconstruction. Acta Mater. 2013;61:3370–3377. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacSleyne J, Uchic M, Simmons J, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of secondary gamma precipitates in René-88 DT and UMF-20 superalloys. Acta Math. 2009;57(20):6251–6267. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.053
   Google Scholar
• Niezgoda SR, Turner DM, Fullwood DT, et al. Optimized structure based representative volume element sets reflecting the ensemble-averaged 2-point statistics. Acta Mater. 2010;58:4432–4445. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniassadi M, Garmestani H, Li DS, et al. 3-phase solid oxide fuel cell anode microstructure realization using 2-point correlation functions. Acta Mat. 2011;59(1):30–43. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.012
   Google Scholar
• Guo EY, Chawla N, Jing T, et al. Accurate modeling and reconstruction of three-dimensional percolating filamentary microstructures from two-dimensional micrographs via dilation-erosion method. Mater Charac. 2014;89:33–42. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2013.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanabadi A, Baniassadi M, Abrinia K, et al. Optimization of solid oxide fuel cell cathodes using two-point correlation functions. comp. Mater. Sci. 2016;111:107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Nguyen L, DeGraef M, et al. A Markov random field approach for microstructure synthesis. Mod Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2016;24(3):1–13. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/24/3/035015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar P, Sundararaghavan V. A Markov random field approach for modeling spatio-temporal evolution of microstructures. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Engr. 2016;24:075005). doi:10.1088/0965-0393/24/7/075005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A, Gokhale AM, Spowart JE, et al. Quantitative characterization of spatial clustering in three-dimensional microstructures using two-point correlation functions. Acta Mater. 2004;52(2):307–319. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostanabad R, Bui A, Xie W, et al. Stochastic microstructure characterization and reconstruction via supervised learning. Acta Mater. 2016;103:89–102. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung J, Yoon JI, Park HK, et al. Microstructure design using machine learning generated low dimensional and continuous design space. Materialia. 2020;11:100690. doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100690
   Google Scholar
• Hsu T, Epting WK, Kim H, et al. Microstructure generation via generative adversarial network for heterogeneous, topologically complex 3D materials. JOM. 2021;73:90–102. doi:10.1007/s11837-020-04484-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unocic RR, Zhou N, Kovarik L, et al. Dislocation decorrelation and relationship to deformation microtwins during creep of a γ′precipitate strengthened Ni-based superalloy. Acta Mater. 2011;59:7325–7339. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock TM, Argon A. Creep resistance of CMSX-3 Nickel-base superalloy single crystals. Acta Mat. 1992;40:1–30. doi:10.1016/0956-7151(92)90195-K
   Google Scholar
• Nouailhas D, Cailletaud G. Multiaxial behaviour of Ni-base single crystals. Scrip Mater. 1996;34:565–571. doi:10.1016/1359-6462(95)00547-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busso E, Meissonier F, ODowd N. Gradient-dependent deformation of two-phase single crystals. Jour Mech Phys Sol. 2000;48:2333–2361. doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(00)00006-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm BS, Chang K, McDowell DL, et al. Linking phase-field and finite-element modeling for process-structure-property relations of a Ni-base superalloy. Acta Mater. 2012;60:5984–5999. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy TA, Rao SI, Dimiduk DM. A fast spreadsheet model for the yield strength of superalloys. Superalloys. 2004;2004:887–896. doi:10.7449/2004/Superalloys_2004_887_896
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarz S, Ghosh S. Hierarchical crystal plasticity FE model for nickel-based superalloys: Sub-grain microstructures to polycrystalline aggregates. Int Jour Sol Struc. 2015;55:17–31. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenthe W. Twin related domains in polycrystalline nickel-base superalloys: 3D structure and fatigue [PhD thesis, University of California- Santa Barbara; 2017
   Google Scholar
• Echlin MP, Mottura A, Wang M, et al. Three-dimensional characterization of the permeability of W-Cu composites using a new “TriBeam” technique. Acta Mater. 2014b;64:307–315. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CH, Lee CK. Minimum cross entropy thresholding. Pattern Recognit. 1993;26(4):617–625. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(93)90115-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer F. Topographic distance and watershed lines. Sign Proc. 1994;38(1):113–125. doi:10.1016/0165-1684(94)90060-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg DE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. MA: Addison- Wesley, Reading; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Massey FJ. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of Fit. J Amer Stat Assoc. 1951;46(253):68–78. doi:10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S. Micromechanical analysis and multi-scale modeling using the voronoi cell finite element method. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarz S, Ghosh S. Multi-scale crystal plasticity finite element model approach to modeling nickel-based superalloys. Acta Mater. 2013;61:6549–6561. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemat-Nasser S, Hori M. Micromechanics: overall properties of heterogeneous materials. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacˇ M, Simonov I, Cizelj L. The effect of grain structure on the elastic-plastic response of a polycrystalline aggregate. Jol Mech. Engr. 2002;48:580–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohdi TI, Wriggers P. An introduction to computational micromechanics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Weber G, Pinz M, Ghosh S. Machine learning-aided parametrically-homogenized crystal plasticity model (PHCPM) for single crystal Ni-based superalloys. JOM. 2020;72(12):4404–4419. doi:10.1007/s11837-020-04344-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveranikt GR, McClung RC, Wu Y-T, et al. Turbine rotor material design. US Dept of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration report DOT/FAA/AR-00/64 2000.
   Google Scholar
• FAA. Damage tolerance for high energy turbine engine components. FAA Advis Circ AC. 2001;33:14–11. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_33_14-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leverant GR, McClung RC, Millwater HR, et al. A new tool for design and certification of aircraft turbine rotors. Proceedings of ASME TURBO EXPO 2002 Jun 3–6 2002; Amsterdam, The Netherlands, GT-2002-30303.
   Google Scholar
• Enright MP, McClung RC, Chan KS, et al. Micromechanics-based fracture risk assessment using integrated probabilistic damage tolerance analysis and manufacturing process models. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT; 2016, Jun 13–17, Seoul, South Korea, GT2016-58089.
   Google Scholar
• McClung RC, Enright MP, Liang W, et al. Integration of manufacturing process simulation with probabilistic damage tolerance analysis of aircraft engine components. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference; 2012 Apr 23 - 26; Honolulu, Hawaii, AIAA 2012-1528.
   Google Scholar
• Millwater HP, Fitch SHK, Wu Y-T, et al. A probabilistically based damage tolerance analysis computer program for hard alpha anomalies in titanium rotors. IGTI 2000, ASME TURBO EXPO 2000: LAND, SEA, AND AIR, May 8-11, 2000 – Munich Germany, 2000-GT-0421.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk D, Kotha S, Pilchak AL, et al. Two-way multi-scaling for predicting fatigue crack nucleation in titanium alloys using parametrically homogenized constitutive models. JMPS. 2019;128:181–207.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Noraas R, Pilchak RA, et al. Data driven tools and methods for microtexture classification and dwell fatigue life prediction in dual phase titanium alloys. The 14th world conference on titanium, MATEC Web of conferences 321; 2020. 11091. doi:10.1051/matecconf/202032111091
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Joseph S, Karamched P, et al. Predicting dwell fatigue life in titanium alloys using modelling and experiment. Nature Comm. 2020;11(5868 (2020)). doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19470-w.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Dunne FPE. The mechanistic link between macrozones and dwell fatigue in titanium alloys. Int J Fatigue. 2021;142:105971. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Venkatesh V, Noraas R, et al. Parametrically upscaled crack nucleation model (PUCNM) for fatigue nucleation in titanium alloys containing micro-texture regions (MTR). 2023. (in review).
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk D, Pilchak AL, Ghosh S. Experimentally validated dwell and cyclic fatigue crack nucleation model for (-titanium alloys. Scripta Mater. 2017;127:15–18. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.08.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison J, Li M, Wolverton C, et al. Virtual aluminum castings: An industrial application of ICME. JOM. 2006b;58:28–35. doi:10.1007/s11837-006-0224-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semiatin SL, Furrer DU. Modeling of microstructure evolution during THE THERMOMECHANICAL PROCESSING of titanium alloys, fundamentals of modeling for metals processing, ASM-International Metals Handbook Volume 22A, ASM-International, 2009, pp. 522-533.
   Google Scholar
• Furrer D, Chatterjee A, Shen G, et al. Development and application of microstructure and mechanical property models for titanium alloys. In: Minomi M., Akiyama, S., Ikeda M., etal, editors. Ti-2007 Science and Technology. Sendai, Japan: The Japan Institute of Metals; 2007. pp. 781–788.
   Google Scholar
• Furrer D, Goetz R, Shen G. Modeling and simulation of alloy 718 microstructure and mechanical properties, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Superalloy 718 & Derivatives, 2010 Oct 10–13, 2010. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: TMS.
   Google Scholar
• Shen G. Microstructure modeling of forged components of ingot metallurgy nickel base superalloys, In: Chang, K.-M., Srivastava, S. K., Furrer, K. R., etal, editors. Advanced technologies for superalloy affordability; The minerals, metals and materials society; 2000, p 223–231.
   Google Scholar
• Furrer D, Groppi G, and Bunge G. Current and future trends in the manufacture of turbine engine disks; 2004 ASM materials solutions conference. 2004 Oct. 18-21; Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Burlatsky SF, Furrer DU, Venkatesh V, et al. Probabilistic model, system, and application for component design optimization, to be published 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Donegan S, Groeber M. Data structures and work- flows for ICME. In: Ghosh, S., Woodward, C., Przybyla, C. editors. Integrated computational materials engineering (ICME). Cham: Springer; 2020. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40562-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ. Clustering by means of medoids. In: Dodge Y., editor. Statistical data analysis based on the L_1 norm and related methods ; North-Holland; 1987 p. 405–416.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw PJ. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Jol. Comput. Appl. Mathem. 1987;20:53–65. doi:10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spowart JE, Mayurama B, Miracle DB. Multiscale characterization of spatially heterogeneous systems: implications for discontinuously reinforced metal-matrix composite microstructures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001;307:51–66. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01962-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiveti DM, Ghosh S. Morphology based domain partitioning of multi-phase materials: A preprocessor for multi-scale modelling. Int Jol. Numer. Meth. Engr. 2007;69:1717–1754. doi:10.1002/nme.1834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilchak A. Fatigue crack growth rates in alpha titanium: faceted vs. striation growth. Scrip Mater. 2013;68(5):277–280. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.10.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm SA, Castro JF, Chapman BD, et al. Smarter testing through simulation for efficient design and attainment of regulatory compliance. 30th ICAF Symposium – Kraków, 5–7 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Hu X, Lancaster D, et al. Modeling deformation and failure in AlSi-polyester abradable sealcoating material using microstructure-based finite element simulation. Available from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract = 4046348 or 2022 Posted: 1 Mar 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Alam A, Eastman D, Jo M, et al. Development of a high-temperature tensile tester for micromechanical characterization of materials supporting meso-scale ICME models. JOM. 2016;11(68):2754–2760. doi:10.1007/s11837-016-2100-1
   Google Scholar