Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): status and future challenges

References

• Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, et al. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;344:768–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braude P, Pickering S, Flinter F, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:941–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper JC, Wilton L, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:234–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal F, Gimenez C, Rubio C, et al. FISH preimplantation diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy in recurrent pregnancy wastage. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:310–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Echten-Arends J, Mastenbroek S, Sikkema-Raddatz B, et al. Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:620–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Lei C, Wu J, et al. The establishment and application of preimplantation genetic haplotyping in embryo diagnosis for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation carriers. BMC Med Genomics. 2017;10:60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T, Hunt P. Maternal age and chromosomally abnormal pregnancies: what we know and what we wish we knew. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;6:703–708.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RA, Pickering S. The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British Fertility Society Policy and Practice Guidelines. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008;11:71–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harton GL, Munnè S, Surrey M, et al. PGD preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1695–1703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munné S, et al. Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:292–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson JL. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis at 20 years. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30:682–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, et al. Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1923–1927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman S, Bahçe M, ŞAmlı H, et al. Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2003–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan M, Cobo AC, Rodrigo L, et al. Redefining advanced maternal age as an indication for preimplantation genetic screening. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:649–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Fischer J, Warner A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:326–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Perez-Cano I, et al. FISH screening of aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos to improve IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:497–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin DK, Handyside AH, Harper JC, et al. Clinical experience with preimplantation diagnosis of sex by dual fluorescent in situ hybridization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:132–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilton L, Thornhill A, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1221–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masternbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:454–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper JC, Coonen E, De Rycke M, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England). 2010;25:821–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee Opinion No. 430: preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:766–767.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med. 2009;15:577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertzanidou A, Wilton L, Cheng J, et al. Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:256–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga A, Sandalinas M, Benkhalifa M, et al. Laser blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation diagnosis in the human. Zygote. 1997;5:351–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumoulin JC, Bras M, Coonen E, et al. Effect of Ca2+/Mg2+-free medium on the biopsy procedure for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and further development of human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2880–2883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V, et al. Preimplantation diagnosis of common aneuploidies by the first- and second-polar body FISH analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:285–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verpoest W, Staessen M, Bossuyt P, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1767–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;11:307–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokras A, Sargent IL, Ross C, et al. Trophectoderm biopsy in human blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:821–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, et al. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosome screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1700–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palini S, Galluzzi L, De Stefani S, et al. Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:603–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciorio R, Thong KJ, Pickering SJ. Single blastocyst transfer (SET) and pregnancy outcome of day 5 and day 6 human blastocysts vitrified using a closed device. Cryobiology. 2018;84:40–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harton GL, De Rycke M, Fiorentino F, et al. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2806–2812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still in search of a clinical application: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traeger-Synodinos J, Staessen C. In: Sermon K, Viville S, editors. Textbook of human reproductive genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 157–171.
   Google Scholar
• De Rycke M, Belva F, Goossens V, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIII: cycles from January to December 2010 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2011. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1763–1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells D, Alfarawati S, Fragouli E. Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:703–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treff NR, Levy B, Su J, et al. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:583–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handyside AH. PGD and aneuploidy screening for 24 chromosomes by genome-wide SNP analysis: seeing the wood and the trees. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:686–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treff NR, Scott RT Jr. Four-hour quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based comprehensive chromosome screening and accumulating evidence of accuracy, safety, predictive value, and clinical efficacy. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1049–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies – the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:31–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet. 2012;5:24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Blastocyst biopsy in CCS and fresh ET significantly increases IVF implantation and delivery rates; an RCT. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:687–703.
   Google Scholar
• Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, et al. In vitro fertilisation with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomised controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:100–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang H-J, Melnick AP, Stewart JD, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits? Fertil Steril. 2016;106:597–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orvieto R. Preimplantation genetic screening- the required RCT that has not yet been carried out. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2089–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Wells D. Aneuploidy in the human blastocyst. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2011;133:149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, et al. Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid-aneuploid blastocysts. Hum Genet. 2017;136:805–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortoriello DV, Dayal M, Beyhan Z, et al. Reanalysis of human blastocysts with different molecular genetic screening platforms reveals significant discordance in ploidy status. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1467–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Vidali A, Braverman J, et al. Accuracy of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is compromised by degree of mosaicism of human embryos. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14:54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton H, Graham SJL, Van der Aa N, et al. Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal development potential. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: the European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1586–1601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grifo J, Kofinas J, Schoolcraft WB. The practice of in vitro fertilization according to the published literature. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:658–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Velasco JA, Fauser B. Preimplantation genetic screening – what a wonderful world it would be! Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32:337–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar