Assisted reproductive technology outcome in United States of America and Australia with New Zealand: comparison of annual reports 2005–2016

References

• Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet (London, England). 1978;2(8085):366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby T. Robert Edwards: Nobel Prize for father of in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet. 2010;376(9749):1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia J, Acosta A, Andrews MC, et al. In vitro fertilization in Norfolk, Virginia, 1980–1983. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1984;1(1):24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Letton J. The early history of IVF in Australia and its contribution to the world (1970–1990). Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44(6):495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(12):1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Osterman MJK, Kochanek KD, MacDorman MF, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2012–2013. Pediatrics. 2015;135(6):1115–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pison G, Monden C, Smits J. Twinning rates in developed countries: trends and explanations. Popul Dev Rev. 2015;41(4):629–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir H. World faces ‘epidemic’ of twins. New Scientist; 2001. Available from: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1001-world-faces-epidemic-of-twins/
   Google Scholar
• Adashi EY. Seeing double: a nation of twins from sea to shining sea. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):311–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissin DM, Kulkarni AD, Mneimneh A, et al. Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(4):954–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fertility Treatment 2014–2016. Trends and figures; 2014; [accessed 2019 Apr 23]. Available from: www.hfea.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Min JK, Claman P, Hughes E. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102(2):203–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman RJ. Singular success: ART in Australia and New Zealand. O&G Mag. 2016;18(1):34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman RJ, Richter KS, Jones HW. Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(10):2599–2607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penzias A, Bendikson K, Butts S, et al. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):901–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaldowie A, Lee E, Chambers GM. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, the University of New South Wales; 2013. p. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Miller LM, Hodgson R, Wong TY, et al. Single embryo transfer for all? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;56(5):514–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Hayes E, et al. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sazonova A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes comparing women undergoing two in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(3):731–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(10):1957–1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunby J. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2012 results from the Canadian ART Register; 2012. https://cfas.ca/_Library/_documents/CARTR_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saito H, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2015 by The Ethics Committee of The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2018;17(1):20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegers-Hochschild F, Schwarze JE, Crosby JA, et al. Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction (REDLARA). Assisted reproductive techniques in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2013. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32(6):614–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, et al. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004–2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferraretti AP, Nygren K, Andersen AN, et al. Trends over 15 years in ART in Europe: an analysis of 6 million cycles. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;2017(2):hox012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egea RR, Puchalt NG, Escrivá MM, et al. OMICS: current and future perspectives in reproductive medicine and technology. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;7(2):73–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee AM, Connell MT, Csokmay JM, et al. Elective single embryo transfer – the power of one. Contracept Reprod Med. 2016;1(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koot YEM, Teklenburg G, Salker MS, et al. Molecular aspects of implantation failure. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2012;1822(12):1943–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herington JL, Guo Y, Reese J, et al. Gene profiling the window of implantation: microarray analyses from human and rodent models. J Reprod Heal Med. 2016;2(Suppl. 2):S19–S25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christianson MS, Bellver J. Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies: impact on contemporary donor egg practice and future advances. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):994–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RS, Doody KJ, Schattman GL, et al. Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(2):157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar